Beware the Red Mirage and Trump sewing further discord, refusing to accept loss

[0nelilreb]

That's interesting.

Since it's never happened, does anyone know who would bear the task of removing a political executive (prez or gov) who refused to leave office after losing the election???

I think it should fall to Congress since they represent the people to mandate an order of removal to the SS .

 

[OHvol40]

The Roman Empire says you should think that through . You don’t want the worlds mightiest military to start determining who stays and who goes or when do you ?

Ok, but you didn’t answer the question.

 

[SamRebel35]

The hanging chads called. They want their "rigged election" back.

 

[MontyPython]

I see you!!! First in line on the left side.

Excellent flagellation; nice form.

I learned all my flaggelling in 9th grade biology.

 

[0nelilreb]

Ok, but you didn’t answer the question.

I did right above the post

 

[McDad]

No.

But, the election of Lincoln in 1860 did directly result in the Civil War.

(Hog enters conversation in 3... 2... 1...)

I would assume the Secret Service (in a prez refusal to leave) might be the Sergeant at Arms.

 

[LouderVol]

Hillary Clinton Tells Biden Not To Accept The Election Results If He Loses

 

[MontyPython]

I would assume the Secret Service (in a prez refusal to leave) might be the Sergeant at Arms.

Given that Pelosi is in line to assume Presidency, I'd say let her do it.

Make it a pay-per-view cage match. National deficit solved!

 

[0nelilreb]

Given that Pelosi is in line to assume Presidency, I'd say let her do it.

Make it a pay-per-view cage match. National deficit solved!

Pelosi is 80 and still wears high heels , Trump sweeps the leg and both hips are gone he gets another 4 years

 

[OHvol40]

I did right above the post

Got ya, missed it. Maybe it should fall to Congress... The issue could be messy.

 

[0nelilreb]

Got ya, missed it. Maybe it should fall to Congress... The issue could be messy.

Agree but I really would love to keep our very fine military out of our political elections if possible. That’s never seems to end well . Lol

 

[McDad]

Got ya, missed it. Maybe it should fall to Congress... The issue could be messy.

Congress has subpoena powers. So, I know they have authority to enforce some things. I don't know if they have authority to remove a lingering loser. Be kinda cool to see how something would play out.

 

[hog88]

The left doesn’t expect to win.
This mail in stuff is just another way to deny the results.
I still know people who think Al Gore was the rightful president

Bingo! They don't expect to win and they are setting the stage to paint Trump as illegitimate for his second term.

 

[hog88]

Who would you prefer remove someone that refuses to leave office?

Nobody is going to refuse to leave office, BUT if that ever happened it should be the US Marshals and only the US Marshals.

 

[lawgator1]

Can’t win with dead people voting, a person voting 10 times in 10 different states, and throwing away republican mail-in-votes in the garbage. You can’t win, when a mail person sabotages the republican votes. You can’t win, when a volunteer burns republican mail-in-votes. You can’t win, when China sends in millions of voter fraud mail-in-votes, in which has already been caught. I think you get the idea of voter id, vote in person, and voting machines is the only way.

All false. This is misinformation spread by Russia and Trump (one in the same, actually)

 

[lawgator1]

Bingo! They don't expect to win and they are setting the stage to paint Trump as illegitimate for his second term.

He's been illegitimate since day 1. No need to set the stage for what is already obvious.

 

[OHvol40]

Nobody is going to refuse to leave office, BUT if that ever happened it should be the US Marshals and only the US Marshals.

Aren’t they overseen by a presidential appointee though?

 

[hog88]

He's been illegitimate since day 1. No need to set the stage for what is already obvious.

And right on que.

 

[lawgator1]

@lawgator1 we all knew it was coming, but Trump just said it himself

And there it is.

He has to go. He is an existential threat to the country.

 

[utvolpj]

He's been illegitimate since day 1. No need to set the stage for what is already obvious.

How so?

adjective

1. not authorized by the law; not in accordance with accepted standards or rules.

 

[Ten_Titans]

With so many ballots coming in by mail and counting taking some time, keep an eye out for Trump prematurely claiming victory and refusing to accept a loss.

That's why he's trying so hard to undermine mail in voting. He setting up civil war because that's what will happen if he refuses to leave.

How hard is it to just post the link? This report from Bloomberg was talked about ad nauseam yesterday, and you stroll in here like this is your brain child or something. All the time.

 

[hog88]

Aren’t they overseen by a presidential appointee though?

Yes and? Are you saying the Marshal Service will not due their sworn duty?

I get that you want to chicken little this thing but the US Military has zero business in domestic affairs.

 

[37L1]

How hard is it to just post the link? This report from Bloomberg was talked about ad nauseam yesterday, and you stroll in here like this is your brain child or something. All the time.

His brain child has been visited by Planned Parenthood.

 

[Ernest T. Vol]

And there it is.

He has to go. He is an existential threat to the country.

When is an election over? Maybe Hillary can still win 2016.

 

[OHvol40]

Yes and? Are you saying the Marshal Service will not due their sworn duty?

I get that you want to chicken little this thing but the US Military has zero business in domestic affairs.

I’m saying: suggesting a presidential appointee (especially appointees of this President) will be honorable rather than loyal to the president is laughable. A neutral, non-President appointed entity would have to do the duty of removing a losing president.