Weezy
Diaper Dandy
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 4,484
- Likes
- 1,266
So what is there a fine or something? Effn idiots.
Not sure. I just know that they are close to the edge of their footprint. It wouldn't be much trouble to get transmission to them because of that. However, getting to a utility that is further within the footprint would be a problem, which may be what you are talking about. Instead of a new company having to invest in new transmission to serve the customer, this new thing you are talking about would allow the company to use existing TVA transmission lines. I'm not sure how that would work...Ya, looks like the key is using the existing transmission lines. I'm guessing Bristol and Paducah built new transmission?
The actual ”desired outcome” is our federal tax dollars being spent on “green energy”.According to the article, the earth has been in a warming trend for 300 years, long before high carbon emission levels. And during 2020, we saw the largest ever reduction in global carbon emissions yet saw no reduction in atmospheric CO2 levels. Also, the US only accounts for 10 percent of emissions in the first place.
So, our plan is to spend a lot of money as a country and to increase the financial burden of our citizens by increasing taxes and electric prices in order to put a small dent in global carbon emissions with no evidence of a desired outcome resulting from our efforts?
Apparently they do, who would have thunk it.Do those things even still exist?