biden's niece's diary

You are all in on defending a pedo showering with his daughter. That’s it. End of story.
I'm not defending a proven act of sexual abuse. I'm saying that I don't believe that such abuse ever happened, and I have explained why I feel that way.
 
I will say it one more time :

I'm not defending the commission of such an act. I'm saying that I don't believe that it actually ever happened, because I believe that Project Veritas forged those entries concerning sexual abuse in Ashley Biden's diary. As the video I have posted shows, they have a proven track record of committing fraud.
How do you know they forged them? Call it a hunch isn’t actually a legal term to disprove something. For someone who continuously post links, I’m yet to see one by you that says they are forged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
I will say it one more time :

I'm not defending the commission of such an act. I'm saying that I don't believe that it actually ever happened, because I believe that Project Veritas forged those entries concerning sexual abuse in Ashley Biden's diary. As the video I have posted shows, they have a proven track record of committing fraud.
There is also videos of groping, hair sniffing, and nipple pinching. Are you defending that? Do you believe that didn’t happen also?

He showered with his daughter and you refuse to believe it.
 
The inter-state transportation of stolen property is within their jurisdiction.... and this does involve the president.

If the fbi is wasting taxpayers money chasing down a worthless diary because it belongs to the presidents daughter, then everyone one involved should be fired and imprisoned for treason against taxpayers.
 
There is also videos of groping, hair sniffing, and nipple pinching. Are you defending that? Do you believe that didn’t happen also?

He showered with his daughter and you refuse to believe it.
I refuse to believe it, because of the involvement of Project Veritas. I think it is likely, based on their history, that members of Project Veritas forged the content that you are alluding to.
 
The laptop was real and should have been covered since it involved a presidential candidate. Zuckerberg pretty much corroborated the govt involvement in squashing any widespread discussion. How are either of those lunatic fringe ideas?
Question, did the FBI directly approach Zuckerberg, or did they go through Facebook channels?
 
You ignore the videos of the kiddie groping, the child nipple pinching, the weird hair sniffing?
No, not at all. Those things are very inappropriate and weird. I'm pretty sure that Biden even acknowledged the inappropriate behavior during the 2020 Presidential Campaign. I understand thinking that he is a creepy old perv.

Now having said that, are you ignoring this video below? Because I think it legitimately draws the integrity of Project Veritas into question, and makes it clear that they would not be above forging diary entries in order to hurt a Democrat.


 
It's amazing how one side will accept unverified and unproven allegations as gospel when it involves the guy across the aisle.
If literally anyone other than Project Veritas had handled the diary before it reached the FBI, this really could have had more of an impact. It is too easy to believe, based on their history, that they forged those entries concerning sexual abuse. This is right up their ally.
 
From Friday night BB85 has posted only in this thread on this website. There was a single post in another thread about his super cool trip coming up. But that’s it. No other thread has he posted in.

Is your employment tied to defending pedo showers? Why are you defending this so much?
 
LOL. The FBI wasn't investigating this in October of 2020. You aren't being honest with yourself here. If anyone but Project Veritas had handled that diary in-between the time it was in Robert Kurlander and Aimee Harris's possession, and before it reached the FBI, those right-wing outlets may have reported on the contents of the diary. The fact is, they don't trust Project Veritas. That is the reason that this story has mostly been ignored.

The Bidens notified the US Attorney SDNY sometime in Oct/Nov of 2020 that the diary had been "stolen and was being used as leverage to gain an interview" and the investigation began. PV hadn't published the diary. Nobody wanted the heat of the Biden FBI so most every organization stayed away from it.
 
No, not at all. Those things are very inappropriate and weird. I'm pretty sure that Biden even acknowledged the inappropriate behavior during the 2020 Presidential Campaign. I understand thinking that he is a creepy old perv.

Now having said that, are you ignoring this video below? Because I think it legitimately draws the integrity of Project Veritas into question, and makes it clear that they would not be above forging diary entries in order to hurt a Democrat.




So people on video backtracking on what they said. And the left saying it was manipulated is comical. Don’t think many using this spin cared when it was Trump having selective edits. 4 mins and not one shred of proof of PV being in the wrong but a person connected to an candidate having his words used against him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
I refuse to believe it, because of the involvement of Project Veritas. I think it is likely, based on their history, that members of Project Veritas forged the content that you are alluding to.

Then because of their history you must believe that the FBI is lying about the ML raid and what they found?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
Yeah thats some crazy crap. See a backpack/skateboard/any personal item laying on a park bench, dropped in a hallway or on the sidewalk etc...i raised my kids to never take anything like that because despite the fact that they didnt know who any item belonged to, they knew it wasnt THEIRS. That makes logical and moral sense. Public stuff lost dropped left behind etc...

But move into a house....and the previous ADULT tenants willingly leave some item behind for MONTHS and never make any attempt whatsoever to be a responsible adult and contact the current resident, much less you know...remove their belongings from a residence when moving out like a normal responsible adult....they leave their trash for the new tenants to have to throw away/keep/ sell etc and the jackazzes in this situation are supposed to be the NEW tenants? In order for the new tenants to be in the wrong, one would have to believe that it was not the responsibility of the previous tenant to actually clean up after themselves and take all of their stuff with them ....but the responsibility rather falls on the NEW tenant to track down the old tenant from months prior and return items to them so unimportant to the previous tenants that they never once came looking for them???

If not....then one would have to believe that the actual crime occurred not in that manner....but because the new tenants chose to sell the abandoned item rather than keeping it or doing the previous tenants job and throwing the apparently unwanted item in the trash???

I think there is a serious distinction between taking something that is not yours....stealing....and taking posession of an item that a previous tenant abandoned IN the place where you now live, and have lived establishing residence for months by paying rent... and thereby temporary ownership of not only the domicile but the contents of ones home.

This sounds like people getting railroaded by a partisan BS leftist corrupt justice system in a liberal cesspool. First mistake was liviing in a liberal sheithole to begin with...i bet the farm that if it was Trumps daughters diary full of crap that made Trump out to be the child molestor that Biden is....these folks never even face charges in that liberal dumpster fire. No way.
They are renters. If you rent a house you can't just start selling off whatever you find inside because its not yours.
 
So people on video backtracking on what they said. And the left saying it was manipulated is comical. Don’t think many using this spin cared when it was Trump having selective edits. 4 mins and not one shred of proof of PV being in the wrong but a person connected to an candidate having his words used against him.
Watch the video. The first guy being interviewed isn't backtracking on anything that he previously said. He is explaining how two separate videos were taken out of context and spliced together as if they were from the same video. He also says that he was offered $10,000 to change his story and admit to ballot harvesting.
 
Watch the video. The first guy being interviewed isn't backtracking on anything that he previously said. He is explaining how two separate videos were taken out of context and spliced together as if they were from the same video. He also says that he was offered $10,000 to change his story and admit to ballot harvesting.
I did. Ole boy got caught with his pants down and had no records of transaction or paper trail to prove it. Also driving while videoing isn’t a good look.
 

VN Store



Back
Top