BREAKING: Syracuse investigating report that Asst coach Molested former ball boy

#26
#26
therealUT said:
Was McQueary's testimony corroborated by anything? Yet, you wanted Paterno to go to the police with it. That is accepting non-corroborated testimony.
Click to expand...

No, it's not. If you get an allegation of sexual abuse, you report it immediately so an investigation can be done by professionals who can corroborate it or dismiss it. You're clueless as usual.
 
#27
#27
LawVol13 said:
First, I do believe McQreary, but I have maintained the entire time that Penn State's failure to conduct any investigation into these allegations is what caused everyone to be fired, and that firing was more than warranted. Now, to corroborate McQreary's story, we have about 20 other victims testifying that they've been raped, molested, fondled, etc. by the same man. We also have Joe Paterno's own admission that he was immediately told of what happened by McQreary, and JOe Paterno's own admission that he only told the AD, who has now been indicted. The coverup that allowed no investigation of explosive allegations is what should cause all of these people to be indicted, and it appears there is currently more than enough evidence to convict Sandusky on multiple counts of child rape.

So, I think somehow, there's a little more to go on in this case than 1 victim alleging that he was molested. If more comes out, I'll act the exact same way as I did with Penn State.

As for you trying to insult me: from a sick **** that tries to justify men raping boys and men ****ing 5 year old girls, I'll consider it a compliment. You, and your condescending, arrogant, pro-pedophile, bull**** philosophy touting attitude can go to hell as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...

Continue your equivocations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#28
#28
LawVol13 said:
No, it's not. If you get an allegation of sexual abuse, you report it immediately so an investigation can be done by professionals who can corroborate it or dismiss it. You're clueless as usual.
Click to expand...

Oh, only if an allegation is reported to you...not if you see a young child in a grown man's bed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#35
#35
LawVol13 said:
Yes, I've said that so many times in this thread.
Click to expand...
He said that Boeheim knew he was traveling on the road and sleeping in Fine's room.

"Boeheim saw me with Bernie all the time in the hotel rooms, on road trips," Davis said. "He'd come in, and see me laying in the bed, kind of glance at me like, 'What are you doing here?' But he wouldn't say that. He'd just scowl. And I would look at him like, I'd be nervous. I felt embarrassed 'cause I felt stupid that I'm there. I'm not supposed to be here. I know it, and Boeheim's not stupid."
Click to expand...

Witness quote that boeheim knew, but he didn't report it. Just like paterno.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#36
#36
rmsmith said:
Witness quote that boeheim knew, but he didn't report it. Just like paterno.
Click to expand...

That witness is not credible like McQueary is credible, though (forget about the fact that McQueary has given contradictory accounts of what happened).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#37
#37
therealUT said:
You are allowed to twist my words but I am not allowed to twist yours? And, I am the arrogant one?

At least I am consistent.
Click to expand...

I haven't twisted your words. You described a situation where you thought it acceptable for a 50 year old man to have sex with a 5 year old girl. I didn't make it up. You said it, and now you're running away from it. That's not consistent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#39
#39
LawVol13 said:
I haven't twisted your words. You described a situation where you thought it acceptable for a 50 year old man to have sex with a 5 year old girl. I didn't make it up. You said it, and now you're running away from it. That's not consistent.
Click to expand...

I did not say it was ever acceptable to rape anyone.
 
#40
#40
therealUT said:
That witness is not credible like McQueary is credible, though (forget about the fact that McQueary has given contradictory accounts of what happened).
Click to expand...

McQueary's version of what he did isn't credible. His claim is because it's backed up by 20 other victims saying similar things happened to them. If it was only McQueary and his changed stories, I would have serious doubts, but it's not even close to that.
 
#43
#43
LawVol13 said:
McQueary's version of what he did isn't credible. His claim is because it's backed up by 20 other victims saying similar things happened to them. If it was only McQueary and his changed stories, I would have serious doubts, but it's not even close to that.
Click to expand...

Oh, so if it was only McQueary telling you something you would have serious doubts; yet, Paterno was supposed to immediately go to the police with information which you have now said comes from someone that would be seriously doubted...

More consistency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#45
#45
therealUT said:
The Paragon of Arrogance.
Click to expand...

Nope. I'm not assuming facts or assuming I know more than anyone else. Based on what is common knowledge on both situations right now, Boeheim and Paterno are in completely different situations.
 
#46
#46
LawVol13 said:
Excuse my misstatement then. You said it was acceptable for a 10 year old boy to be sodomized by a 50 year old man if he consented. That's much better.
Click to expand...

If the boy had the rational capacity to give his fully consent.

I guess not everybody believes in the inherent supremacy of arbitrary numbers like you do.
 
#47
#47
therealUT said:
Oh, so if it was only McQueary telling you something you would have serious doubts; yet, Paterno was supposed to immediately go to the police with information which you have now said comes from someone that would be seriously doubted...

More consistency.
Click to expand...

More dumbassery and failing to make a point from you. What makes McQueary look not credible now are his statements 10 years after the incident and 10 years after Paterno was told. At that time, even if Paterno thought it might not be true, absolutely, 100% should have turned it over to the authorities to be investigated. He kept the truth from coming out. Period.
 
#48
#48
LawVol13 said:
Nope. I'm not assuming facts or assuming I know more than anyone else. Based on what is common knowledge on both situations right now, Boeheim and Paterno are in completely different situations.
Click to expand...

You have done nothing but assume facts, assume what you would do in certain situations, and assume what Paterno must have known, since he is Penn State after all.

At least be intellectually honest if you are going to be an arrogant prick.
 
#49
#49
therealUT said:
If the boy had the rational capacity to give his fully consent.

I guess not everybody believes in the inherent supremacy of arbitrary numbers like you do.
Click to expand...

Ok, I have an idea. Let's start a thread, you pose that question.

"Is a 50 year old man sodomizing a 10 year old boy a situation that could be acceptable under any circumstances." And, you and I won't make one post, and we'll sit back and see what the responses are.
 
#50
#50
LawVol13 said:
More dumbassery and failing to make a point from you. What makes McQueary look not credible now are his statements 10 years after the incident and 10 years after Paterno was told. At that time, even if Paterno thought it might not be true, absolutely, 100% should have turned it over to the authorities to be investigated. He kept the truth from coming out. Period.
Click to expand...

I do not go to the police on hearsay accounts that raise serious doubts. Maybe other people do. Maybe you do; maybe some people decide that an internal investigation to find facts should occur. Of course, this does not help in any defense of Paterno, because you think it is unreasonable for him to trust that such an investigation was happening after his AD told him he would investigate it.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top