hohenfelsvol
How uwe doo-in?!?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 50,392
- Likes
- 2,738
no other option would have been any better. You could have Gore or Kerry. For all his faults I'll still take W over either (and over either dim running now)
I really do think Gore would have been much better than either of the other two you mention. Whether he's right on environmental issues, or a hipocrite about them, whatever, you have to think he would have handled the Mid-East a whole lot better than Bush or Kerry and perhaps not given the oil producing nations there such an incentive to keep production levels so low in the face of increasing demand.
Agree or disagree, the democrat party has been over run with the cooks on the far left.
Dean is making a hard push to keep it that way. You know something is wrong when the Clinton's are considered moderate by their own party.
I have no problem with run of the mill democrats, I understand why they are democrat, who I can't stand is the super left.
I'll take Gore
I really do think Gore would have been much better than either of the other two you mention. Whether he's right on environmental issues, or a hipocrite about them, whatever, you have to think he would have handled the Mid-East a whole lot better than Bush or Kerry and perhaps not given the oil producing nations there such an incentive to keep production levels so low in the face of increasing demand.
I really do think Gore would have been much better than either of the other two you mention. Whether he's right on environmental issues, or a hipocrite about them, whatever, you have to think he would have handled the Mid-East a whole lot better than Bush or Kerry and perhaps not given the oil producing nations there such an incentive to keep production levels so low in the face of increasing demand.
Agree or disagree, the democrat party has been over run with the cooks on the far left.
Dean is making a hard push to keep it that way. You know something is wrong when the Clinton's are considered moderate by their own party.
I have no problem with run of the mill democrats, I understand why they are democrat, who I can't stand is the super left.
If it were just the cooks, it would be better.
But assuming you mean "kooks," I am tempted to agree with you. But, same can be said of the Republican party every eight years.
Seems like that whenever a party is in posiiton to take the WH back, the activists come out and force the potential nominees to promise them their cause de celeb will get full attention. Republican extremists do the same thing when its their turn.