Rickyvol77
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Messages
- 16,786
- Likes
- 21,566
She was at worst a non violent subject of a bungled search warrant where the cops didnt follow protocol with body cams.
The cops may end up 100% in the clear. But this stinks to high heaven. And I guarantee if the cops talk about this internally it's going in the "bad outcome" column and not the "well done police work" column.
So knock on the door and wait for them to answer.And she herself was talking about the drug money with him on tape? And used it to bail him out previously? and was allowing him to knowingly use her address as stated?
Considering the investigators have been caught lying in their investigation elsewhere, I'm not going to believe anything they say "on it's face". Have you heard the tapes at issue or are you repeating the assertion of law enforcement? The feds are still investigating the police here.They have phone conversations to back them up.
I've read the grand jury report along with other sources. Would you believe them if the grand jury indicted? Would they be more credible if they arrived at the conclusion you prefered?Considering the investigators have been caught lying in their investigation elsewhere, I'm not going to believe anything they say "on it's face". Have you heard the tapes at issue or are you repeating the assertion of law enforcement? The feds are still investigating the police here.
Lol Lincoln had a civil war, and several rebellions on his hands. Plenty found him despicable.?????? I'm not talking about lunatics. I'm talking about people who find the president despicable.
That's not even apples and oranges. That's apples and lug wrenches.
And I am sure he had some unfinished business he needed done when he got locked up. Which is why she ended up dating another guy, and no drugs or money were found......They have phone conversations to back them up.
I am sure he was one of the good drug dealers that let his thots handle the money and be part of the decision making....And she herself was talking about the drug money with him on tape? And used it to bail him out previously? and was allowing him to knowingly use her address as stated?
She never had the chance to defend herself in court because her boyfriend decided to open fire on the cops. We can go around and round all day.And I am sure he had some unfinished business he needed done when he got locked up. Which is why she ended up dating another guy, and no drugs or money were found......
and she was never convicted of anything. Thus she was innocent. Kinda sucks when innocent until proven guilty gets in the way of a good shooting.
No. I don't evaluate evidence that way. If the tapes exist, I'll listen to them and make up my own mind. Law enforcement may be right here. If so, so be it. But they've been less than credible at points here so I'll reserve judgement.I've read the grand jury report along with other sources. Would you believe them if the grand jury indicted? Would they be more credible if they arrived at the conclusion you prefered?
ok and that's a fine opinion to have, but it's just as factual correct to say that no one would've died had the police not gotten shot at.1 out 3 lead to a death, not something to brag about.
The whole thing is BS, they should have never been authorized to break through the door for a simple search warrant.
Did you know she got fired as an EMT because of her activities with Glover and that she lied about a dead body that was found in her vehicle?I am sure he was one of the good drug dealers that let his thots handle the money and be part of the decision making....
I didnt realize paying bail made one an accessory to the crime of the person getting out of jail.
ok and that's a fine opinion to have, but it's just as factual correct to say that no one would've died had the police not gotten shot at.
Anyone at 4 addresses. That's a mighty big net they are casting. Almost like they didnt know what they were after but were hoping something would stick at one of those to justify the other 3. It's no wonder they didnt have body cameras on. Much harder to make up justifications if your actions are on camera.The warrant was for anyone in the 4 addresses listed, including her. And it was non-violent until they started shooting at police (whatever they believed)
SO you would be just as skeptical if the grand jury report had indicted the officers? I'm somewhat skeptical here.No. I don't evaluate evidence that way. If the tapes exist, I'll listen to them and make up my own mind. Law enforcement may be right here. If so, so be it. But they've been less than credible at points here so I'll reserve judgement.