The Artful Dodger
Fist Baller
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2015
- Messages
- 1,815
- Likes
- 2,562
i agree with pretty much all this except the part about it not being realistic to expect more.
the reason you can/should expect more is because we have landed all those other guys, and we did put ourselves in a good position to land another guy like HT. it wasn't unrealistic to think we could/should land him. and it's ok to be disappointed if we don't get him, especially if he goes to Bama.
just like it was disappointing to watch Eboigbe and Bogle both commit to Bama. or Norton to GA.
that's ok. i think we're doing a good job of recruiting. we do need to do a better job of finishing with some of these types of guys. it's clear we're getting there, as evidenced by the names you've mentioned above....but getting all those kids...in addition to the eboigbe's, bogles, nortons, and To'oto'o's of the world is the difference between being middle of the pack to getting on the heels of Bama/GA sooner than later.
and it's ok to acknowledge that, while at the same time acknowledging that this class is still a very good one, and it addresses several big needs, and will be a good step forward in our rebuild.
but it's a step.....you start landing the "in addition to's"...then you're taking leaps.
Bama loses out on recruits, Georgia loses out on recruits, LSU, Clemson, Oklahoma, etc and they all still have top classes. My point is that people need to temper the disappointment when players like Henry T. and Crouch were long shots to begin with and we pulled more players like that than a team that's gone 4-8 and 5-7 should have. Basically, be happy for what we have instead of making an opinion about an entire class based off players that were long shots to begin with.
To your post, what I am saying is that we have landed some of the "in addition to's", and we got more of those than our recent on-field performance dictates we should. Nobody gets all of the "in addition to's," especially a team that has struggled like we have.