agree about the job they've done in recruiting HT. they've done an equally good job with several other prospects in this class as well. as for the last part, that's just an opinion, fact is we don't know if anyone could do better/worse. it has been said, even by Pruitt, that it needs to be better, especially at closing.
i don't think i've done that in any of my posts on the subject. and again, we don't know "nobody else could've done better".
i think everyone that's associated with UT is well aware of just how bad it's been. as for the recruit's itself comments, i agree. i generally interpret that, though, to mean that no prospect walks away from TN thinking "well, they don't have this, they dont' have that...". to me, "recruits itself" is in regards to the tangibles...faciliites, resources, support, tradition etc....we'll compare favorably with just about anyone on that stuff. so i don't get to bent out of shape about it.
as for the speed of the rebuild, i think most level headed folks realized that given the issues on the line of scrimmage, 3 years was probably the most widely accepted time frame. and that would just get you (hopefully) even with some of the upper tier programs. not necessarily better.
as i've said, i just don't see why this has to be an ultimatum type argument. is this class good? yep, very good. especially at DB and OL.
is it gooe enough to simply keep pace with the upper teams in the league? no, it's not. is it good enough to get even with programs like USCe, KY, Vandy, MO? yeah, probably.
but that's not the bar. and there's nothing wrong with saying that. just like there's nothing wrong with saying this is going to be a really good class, no matter who else we get. they're both true.