The Dog
Because I Can
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2014
- Messages
- 16,521
- Likes
- 25,161
I only want to see the most talented QB on the roster, and not a second of any other. Dont care who it may be
:hi:
Impossible to tell right now who that is, but Will McBride really looked comfortable in his limited time. JG needs to put on some weight and calm down. QD needs to not be in a feaux read option offense.
Will looked better than QD or JG, IMO
Someone please educate me, why is our fan base excited about this kid? The fact that not a single significant university offered this kid should be a red flag. Top programs don't build teams with qbs ranked 683 in the nation.
Will looked better than QD or JG, IMO
No he didnt, imo. Even while playing Missouris defense which was actually worse than ours last year.
People got excited because he ran through a gaping hole untouched for 40 yards on a defensive bust....and because he threw a ball up for grabs to a wide open receiver before a DT hit him hard. Thats it. We lost 50-16 vs the 90th ranked defense in the nation with him as qb and people were saying hes the answer at qb for the future. He was 16-32 for 139 yards, 1 td, 2 interceptions with a 50 quarterback rating and people think hes the guy. Lol. And that was after playing the second half vs So Miss and going 1-8 for 13 yards. Again, lol.
At no point in time was he as good as QD and certainly not JG. The kid showed he had a little moxie and that he wouldnt completely pee down his leg when he got in the game, and thats about it. If we have a healthy qb room and hes ever higher than 3rd string, were in big, big trouble.
No he didnt, imo. Even while playing Missouris defense which was actually worse than ours last year.
People got excited because he ran through a gaping hole untouched for 40 yards on a defensive bust....and because he threw a ball up for grabs to a wide open receiver before a DT hit him hard. Thats it. We lost 50-16 vs the 90th ranked defense in the nation with him as qb and people were saying hes the answer at qb for the future. He was 16-32 for 139 yards, 1 td, 2 interceptions with a 50 quarterback rating and people think hes the guy. Lol. And that was after playing the second half vs So Miss and going 1-8 for 13 yards. Again, lol.
At no point in time was he as good as QD and certainly not JG. The kid showed he had a little moxie and that he wouldnt completely pee down his leg when he got in the game, and thats about it. If we have a healthy qb room and hes ever higher than 3rd string, were in big, big trouble.
The Gruden thread was peeing its pants over McBride.
And I was over here like.....
![]()
QD gives us the best chance to win (GT game, anyone?). Period. As for Shrout, his success seemed to hinge on WRs who totally outmatched opposing defenses. His tape on hudl, while flashy at times, shows his playmakers streaking all over the field with a 10'+ radius from defenders on most receptions.
What from his play last year tells you that? QD led the conference in turnovers before he got hurt and even worse with red zone turnovers. So no he does not. He didn't win the Game Tech Game for us it was Marquez bailing him out several times and Ga Tech giving it away to us not QD
Ok, while you piss your pants over JG (Lady Liberty marveled at his ability to become statue-esque after the ball was snapped), I will sit back and let you see how it plays out come opening weekend. To discount what occurred in the GT game just shows you have an agenda. Also, if you recall, QD was reportedly injured for a few weeks before going out for good. Not to mention, the playbook was radically different after the FL game.