FranklinVol16
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2020
- Messages
- 352
- Likes
- 1,934
It's all conjecture at this point. If Spyre gave the kid $350K with no strings attached, it's gross incompetence, imo. If that's the case, well have a bunch of highly ranked recruits lined up for the hand outs with little or no intention of signing with the Vols. I suspect, there are strings. I suspect he can get out of the agreement by giving back the $350K. I suspect another school's NIL team/organization would just pay it for him to sign another NIL. I guess I just have a high expectation that the folks at Spyre are smarter than that.Doesn't sound like this guy Caspirino allowed that kind of BS in this particular kid's contact, nor would any remotely decent lawyer. As I said at more length above basically Mandel's article is telling kids to lawyer up and giving them Caspirino's business card.
Generally you can't play games like that if something is illegal, whether you admit you are doing something prohibited or not. Say you lived in a town with 3 restaurants, a McDonald's, a Burger King and a Wendy's, with the McDonald's on one side of the railroad tracks (the Northside) and the other two on the Southside. If it's illegal to require a person to eat at McDonald's, it's also going to be illegal to require someone to eat "only at restaurants on the Northside of the railroad tracks". Judges aren't stupid, and if any of these kids get experienced lawyers, they aren't going to be stupid either. The fact that this contract was drawn up to be clear he doesn't have to go to a particular school tells me that's a legit limitation on these deals. It's most likely that the incentive is that if he doesn't follow through and commit, he simply doesn't get the 7.65 million on the back end of the contract. He can get it somewhere else though. This lawyer in this article says he's not going to allow his clients to sign anything which would purport to have the collective retain NIL rights to a player after the relationship is over.It's been proposed that Spyre may bind him to the area, which would effectively bind him to UT.
It's completely possible that the article was phrased that way to alleviate the perception that he was induced to sign at UT, especially considering the earlier context of the blurb that makes that blatant.What are they TRUSTING his family with?
If you sign your sponsorship rights to a regional sponsorship collective, I'm not sure it's illegal to expect him to be in that region to meet the demands of those regional sponsors.Generally you can't play games like that if something is illegal, whether you admit you are doing something prohibited or not. Say you lived in a town with 3 restaurants, a McDonald's, a Burger King and a Wendy's, with the McDonald's on one side of the railroad tracks (the Northside) and the other two on the Southside. If it's illegal to require a person to eat at McDonald's, it's also going to be illegal to require someone to eat "only at restaurants on the Northside of the railroad tracks". Judges aren't stupid, and if any of these kids get experienced lawyers, they aren't going to be stupid either. The fact that this contract was drawn up to be clear he doesn't have to go to a particular school tells me that's a legit limitation on these deals. It's most likely that the incentive is that if he doesn't follow through and commit, he simply doesn't get the 7.65 million on the back end of the contract.
We are assuming terms, but there is also an implied obligation of good faith and fair dealing in contracts. You can't say "this isn't tied to a school" and then in the setting of obligations make it impossible for the contract to be fulfilled practically at any other school. Courts see right through that kind of BS.If you sign your sponsorship rights to a regional sponsorship collective, I'm not sure it's illegal to expect him to be in that region to meet the demands of those regional sponsors.