nicksjuzunk
Lurking
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
- Messages
- 35,560
- Likes
- 112,832
I understand just fine though the example used didn't seem to be particularly relevant.I don’t understand why he can’t understand this concept.
I believe I read that one stipulation is that they be enrolled in "a" college and playing NCAA football.There is probably a team of lawyers working this NIL stuff. It’s hilarious to me that some folks on here are arguing that we are breaking the rules.
At the end of the day the athlete is getting paid to have his NIL used in a certain region. In order to do that it only makes sense to attend and play at a certain school. But nobody is paying or getting paid to solely for an athlete play football at a certain school.
Seems to me the only exposure UT would have in that scenario would be if the athlete decided to just quit playing football altogether and live in Knoxville. I would assume there would be some sort of protection there as well that doesn’t violate NCAA rules, however unlikely that scenario is.