gunner
The Big Orange Gun
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 7,953
- Likes
- 4,115
So like I said, I've been called a Martin defender or some other name with a similar meaning no less than 100 times over the past month and yet you're telling me now I'm not a Martin defender?
Which is it?
My stance has stayed the same. Make the dance and he should be back. After the A&M game our chances of making the dance looked pretty slim, so based on the assumption we missed the dance I said a move should be made. Martin has righted the ship it would appear, and has the boys in a spot to make the dance. As I said before the year, during the year, and last week...if he makes the dance he deserves to come back.
My position has stayed the same.
Yes it has, and I'm not arguing with your position But, what happens to Martin next season when UT doesn't make the NCAAT and has a losing conference record? Does he deserve another season?
If he does make it this year, how far in the NCAAT does he have to go to be safe for next season?
Yes it has, and I'm not arguing with your position But, what happens to Martin next season when UT doesn't make the NCAAT and has a losing conference record? Does he deserve another season?
If he does make it this year, how far in the NCAAT does he have to go to be safe for next season?
Let me help you out there, Chris.
I said "classic BTO", as in his response to my post was his typical response.
When challenged with a point he knows he can't argue, he instantly tries to turn it into a different argument...and then 3 pages later everyone forgets what they were even arguing about (see his responses a couple days ago when NYC Vol kept hammering him on a topic BTO didn't want to answer).
Your "instant classic" post was aimed at stroking BTo's ego.
Heck...I don't know...on the other hand, maybe I was just drunk when I posted??