California ban on same-sex marriage struck down

Really?

We claim to be the most free country that has ever been on the face of the earth and yet we worry about trivial matters such as this.

In the end, it has to come down to freedom.

I am a christian and I do not agree with homosexuality but the beauty of the matter is that I live in a free country and I can think that way.

I don't want the government to be a watchdog and I certainly do not want the government turning into a theocracy!

Nice choice of color for your script.

:birgits_giggle:
 
It isn't.

Ah...I see...that settles it. Your degree is in?

Also, is pedophilia ever a disease? You know there are adults that honestly believe they love children and there is nothing wrong with interacting with them sexually? You realize this right?
 
I came in a little late.....

What isn't a disease?

HIV or homosexuality?

honestly?

homosexuality.

btw, I agree with your original post here - the goal is for it not to be a "problem" anymore - not b/c we get rid of homosexuality, but b/c people realize it's not a problem at all to begin with.
 
Ah...I see...that settles it. Your degree is in?

I have degrees in reading. And common sense. And Google.

But the WHO, the APA, the governments of the UK and Russia, amongst others, have enough data to determine it's not a disease. I'll let you look it up if you're that interested.
 
Africa is more heavily affected by HIV and AIDS than any other region of the world. An estimated 22.5 million people were living with HIV at the end of 2007 and approximately 1.7 million additional people were infected with HIV during that year. In just the past year, the AIDS epidemic in Africa has claimed the lives of an estimated 1.6 million people in this region. More than eleven million children have been orphaned by AIDS.

There are also studies that are underway in that region. Because testing is not widely available there many think it could be hysteria and causes unrelated to HIV/Aids make up a significant portion of these cases. I am not sure if I buy that though, have to wait for the outcome before I will stand by that.
 
Also, is pedophilia ever a disease? You know there are adults that honestly believe they love children and there is nothing wrong with interacting with them sexually? You realize this right?

You're equating two consenting adults, neither of whom believe having sex with each other is harmful, to pedophilia? Please...
 
I have degrees in reading. And common sense. And Google.

But the WHO, the APA, the governments of the UK and Russia, amongst others, have enough data to determine it's not a disease. I'll let you look it up if you're that interested.

I see. I can read, have common sense and Google as well and I don't see it clear cut as you. So I don't think the traits you describe enable you to declare "it isn't".

I'm sure the WHO and whoever else you listed have no agendas. I am confident they always seek the absolute truth and justice. Kind of like how the UN Hunger Relief program is or never has been corrupt or abused. Stick some letters and titles by it and it is legit.

And...you didn't answer the other question.
 
What percentage of the African population is strictly homosexual? Is the rate of infection of that group lower or higher than the rate of infection among heterosexuals? I can see where it would be higher among heteros given the cultural beliefs you have given.

It would be next to impossible to pose a true estimate. It is a continent where homosexuality is taboo and the populations are very superstitious.
 
You're equating two consenting adults, neither of whom believe having sex with each other is harmful, to pedophilia? Please...

So "adults" is the magic word? Obviously adults are more knowledgeable than children in general, correct? So why is it considered abnormal behavior if a man loves a child and wants to touch him sexually? Especially if he gets the child to consent? The adult is diseased or has a disorder?
 
So "adults" is the magic word? Obviously adults are more knowledgeable than children in general, correct? So why is it considered abnormal behavior if a man loves a child and wants to touch him sexually? Especially if he gets the child to consent? The adult is diseased or has a disorder?

Chemical imbalance..... there you go!

:hi:
 
I see. I can read, have common sense and Google as well and I don't see it clear cut as you. So I don't think the traits you describe enable you to declare "it isn't".

I'm sure the WHO and whoever else you listed have no agendas. I am confident they always seek the absolute truth and justice. Kind of like how the UN Hunger Relief program is or never has been corrupt or abused. Stick some letters and titles by it and it is legit.

What is the WHO's agenda? The APA's? Please, tell me if you have proof that they have an agenda, other than to tell the truth. And we're not talking about the UN, are we? I didn't think we were.

In the absence of any proof of an agenda, we have two options: trust that people who know way more than we do are telling the truth, start to accept it and understand that it makes perfect sense. OR concoct conspiracy theories and only believe what we want to.

I've made up my mind: I'll listen to the experts, who declare that "it isn't."
 
What is the WHO's agenda? The APA's? Please, tell me if you have proof that they have an agenda, other than to tell the truth. And we're not talking about the UN, are we? I didn't think we were.

In the absence of any proof of an agenda, we have two options: trust that people who know way more than we do are telling the truth, start to accept it and understand that it makes perfect sense. OR concoct conspiracy theories and only believe what we want to.

I've made up my mind: I'll listen to the experts, who declare that "it isn't."

The APA has never changed their opinon on a matter? Surely not...right?
 
The APA has never changed their opinon on a matter? Surely not...right?

Neither has the US government. Voting rights for women, blacks - we changed our opinion on those issues over time, therefore we shouldn't validate those decisions either.

Listen, we can argue endlessly down silly paths like this. The point is, homosexuality in and of itself is no more harmful than Rick Astley's music. At worse, for any individual, it should be completely irrelevant. We make it a problem b/c some people aren't comfortable with it, try to reduce others b/c of their own insecurities, and pass these beliefs on to generation after generation. And slowly but surely more people are using common sense to realize that homosexuality is not harmful.

You can fight this inevitable change and keep ending up where we are right now. Or you can consider that perhaps there's another way to approach this.
 
I'm not making anything a problem. Merely debating if homosexuality could possible be a disease or disorder. No emotion to it.
 
Ah...I see...that settles it. Your degree is in?

Also, is pedophilia ever a disease? You know there are adults that honestly believe they love children and there is nothing wrong with interacting with them sexually? You realize this right?

Are you honestly trying to compare something that a person does to a child to something done between two consenting adults.
 

VN Store



Back
Top