InVOLuntary
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 60,837
- Likes
- 144,043
There are ample opportunities out there to mock and deride DEI - this ain’t one of them.
DEI didn’t mismanage the forests.
DEI didn’t block water storage projects.
It was nothing more than good ole fashioned White Liberal busy bodies at work.
It’s not like the Santa Ana winds are a new phenomenon or them reaching 100mph is unheard of.
Only you can prevent forest fires.
what I was expecting...arson....
LA Mayor needs to go too...all state Congress people need to resign...
And hurricanes happen all the time. But there is a difference in categoriesIt’s not like the Santa Ana winds are a new phenomenon or them reaching 100mph is unheard of.
Only you can prevent forest fires.
And hurricanes happen all the time. But there is a difference in categories
But "this one is not typical," Wofford says. This time, the Santa Anas are coupled with "very strong winds in the upper atmosphere. In addition to funneling through the mountains, they went up and over the mountains and then they descended down into the basin area," he says.
Sponsor Message
The result is wind gusts as high as 100 mph in some places, he says, adding that the current dry conditions mean, "everything is just primed and ready to go" for wildfires.
Maybe not. Google just donated $1million to Trump's inauguration. They are trying to keep from getting hammered under the new administration and propping up Puddinhead won't go unnoticed.There is audio of Biden bragging about what all he is doing for wildfires. I'm sure Google has scrubbed and taken that down or will make it hard to find.
I get it that 100mph winds are unusual but that has zero to do with the years/decades of mismanagement and poor planning. Sure even with competent leadership and management the situation is ripe for a bad fire but due to negligence they turned a bad situation into a catastrophic one.
No. I mention it to highlight the broader issue of water mismanagement throughout California. Watershed is critical and in removing watershed it restricts what farmers will be allowed to siphon off for crops. It also takes away relatively inexpensive hydroelectric power generation as well, which is planned to be replaced with what will undoubtedly be more expensive mix of alternative energy for consumers to make up for that loss. There’s more to this agreement and has been in the works for a while, but for a state in such dire need of more water, this hardly makes sense other than it placates the environmentalist.Is there a link between dam removals on the California-Oregon border and fires in LA?