C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 28,345
- Likes
- 49,853
Have you considered that JUST MAYBE the Nazi flags are trying to link Tredeau to the Nazis, not expressing admiration for the Nazis?Sure there is. I saw a picture of someone flying a Nazi flag. I'm sure there have been other displays. In a crowd that big, it's inevitable. Just like in a large protest, it's inevitable that there will be some pathetic idiots.
The violence, looting, and burning that may happen at an otherwise peaceful protest should be condemned - and those responsible arrested and prosecuted.
The racists, bigoted, etc....displays at this protest (or any protest) should be condemned. They did that, no biggie.
It isn't though, in both the US and Canada the government was careful not to condemn the actions of a few. In fact they largely ignored it while city blocks burned. In this case the government is taking a very different stand they are attempting to paint the comparably mild actions of a few with the movement labeling it as unacceptable violence.lol.....That's exactly what 95% of the posters in the PF and the entirety of rightwing media have done with the BLM protests.
Some on the left are doing with this what the right did with the BLM protests.
The double standard is working both ways.
That's not true. Practically everyone condemned the violence.It isn't though, in both the US and Canada the government was careful not to condemn the actions of a few. In fact they largely ignored it while city blocks burned. In this case the government is taking a very different stand they are attempting to paint the comparably mild actions of a few with the movement labeling it as unacceptable violence.
It's one thing for some randos on a message board to treat two different situations with a double standard but for a government to do it proves they are biased and don't treat or represent two different groups equally. Dismiss it if you want but that's a huge problem. And only illustrates the very need for what they are doing.
Furthermore it's one thing to decry murder, arson and assaults. But they are going out of their way to decry simple vandalism and disrespect. They are not the same, surely you place them at different points on your continuum no?
Luther, violence occurred during many if not most BLM protests. There was violence in virtually every major city , I witnessed it here in Nashville not far away from where I live. I witnessed violence live on TV in Atlanta where you live. Not every protest was violent but many were, it wasn't just a few.No, you misunderstood what I was attempting to say. I was talking about the violence that may happen at any protest - like it did in a few of the BLM protests. It should be condemned but not used in an attempt to define the vast majority.
Look at the stats. I've posted them numerous times. I'm done posting them.Luther, violence occurred during many if not most BLM protests. There was violence in virtually every major city , I witnessed it here in Nashville not far away from where I live. I witnessed violence live on TV in Atlanta where you live. Not every protest was violent but many were, it wasn't just a few.
Maybe the issue is what you call violence. I'll revert to the legal definition as the basis for my assertion.
I've never disputed crimes were committed - it's horrible.I believe their issue is they are looking at crimes committed no?
I've never disputed crimes were committed - it's horrible.
I've never disputed people die in car accidents - it's horrible.
I've never disputed people die of COVID - it's horrible.
I've never disputed people did at the hands of stolen gun - it's horrible.
That doesn't answer the question. Are you intentionally evading it?I've never disputed crimes were committed - it's horrible.
I've never disputed people die in car accidents - it's horrible.
I've never disputed people die of COVID - it's horrible.
I've never disputed people did at the hands of stolen gun - it's horrible.