Carroll v. Trump ($88 million judgment for Carroll)

Yea---the man that evangelicals in Iowa and around the country---plus the "traditional values" country crowd--professes to support.
You can cut the MAGA hypocrisy with a knife.

And how about Jan. 6. Can you imagine the rural overalls crowd if a group of blacks had similarly attacked the Capitol? Oh, my.

What is the difference between a Christian and an evangelical?
 
Just a friendly reminder that's he's been adjudged to be a rapist. And an unapologetic one at that. The evangelicals hero.


Former President Donald Trump turned up in Manhattan federal court Wednesday for a second day in a row, as a jury is considering how much he must pay in damages to E. Jean Carroll, after he was found liable last year of both defaming the magazine writer in 2022, and sexually abusing her in the ’90s.

The jury in that first trial in this case cleared the ex-commander-in-chief of Carroll’s rape claim.



 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
Former President Donald Trump turned up in Manhattan federal court Wednesday for a second day in a row, as a jury is considering how much he must pay in damages to E. Jean Carroll, after he was found liable last year of both defaming the magazine writer in 2022, and sexually abusing her in the ’90s.

The jury in that first trial in this case cleared the ex-commander-in-chief of Carroll’s rape claim.



Take it up with the judge
 
Take it up with the judge
According to the article, this judge uses “common definitions” instead of laws.


But Judge Lewis Kaplan called Trump’s semantic argument “entirely unpersuasive.” He clarified that the jury found that the former president did indeed “rape” Carroll based on the common definition of the word.
Kaplan noted that New York penal law (the jury in the Carroll case was based in New York) has a “far narrower” definition of the word “rape” than in “common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere.”

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’” Kaplan wrote.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
According to the article, this judge uses “common definitions” instead of laws.


But Judge Lewis Kaplan called Trump’s semantic argument “entirely unpersuasive.” He clarified that the jury found that the former president did indeed “rape” Carroll based on the common definition of the word.
Kaplan noted that New York penal law (the jury in the Carroll case was based in New York) has a “far narrower” definition of the word “rape” than in “common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere.”

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’” Kaplan wrote.
You don't like us calling your boy Rapin' Don?
 
A) not my boy
B) by common definition I do consider it rape
C) however this is a judge in a court of law dismissing the law in favor of common definition.

But no comment on that whole “law” part, huh?
He also said................ in some federal and state criminal statutes,
 

Trump Accuser E. Jean Carroll Backed by Epstein Island Visitor Reid Hoffman​


1705545053736.png

Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll is backed by LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, who has admitted to visiting convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, also referred to as “Pedophile Island.”

The penalty phase of Carroll’s civil case against the former president kicked off this week, with this second lawsuit stemming from comments Trump made in 2019, rejecting Carroll’s claims of rape.

Nevertheless, in September, U.S. Judge Lewis A. Kaplan ruled that Trump defamed Carroll in 2019 when he denied that he raped her. Carroll could not remember the date of the alleged assault, and there were no witnesses to back her claims. But because the jury decided Trump was liable for sexual battery and defaming Carroll, Kaplan deemed Trump’s remarks to be defamatory. The jury awarded her $5 million in damages. The second lawsuit, however, stems from comments Trump made in

However, Carroll, who has her own share of controversial posts on social media — highlighted by the former president — is backed by billionaire and Democrat mega-donor Reid Hoffman. He publicly admitted this fact nine months ago in a LinkedIn post, asserting that he prefers to “talk about these values and ideas over commenting on specific gifts that I’ve made.”

https://media.breitbart.com/media/2023/07/Creepy-billionaire-Reid-Hoffman.jpg
1705545397026.png
Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn Corp., in Sun Valley, Idaho, on July 14, 2023. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

1705545470134.png





 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
They both have their clothes on in all of those photos.

Since you asked, my favorite is the one where his hands are low on her hips while the two birds are f***ing in the foreground.
 
He also said................ in some federal and state criminal statutes,
I’m no supporter of the Don, and I won’t defend him here.

But to your bolded - Do you think citizens of Oregon should be held accountable to the laws of Mississippi, and vice versa? Should the good people of Oregon be subject to say, Mississippi sodomy laws?
 

VN Store



Back
Top