CFP Bracket Reveal 12est ESPN

#28
#28
The committee has spoken with their talking head piece. This is what Dinich says will happen:

View attachment 704350

If they leave SMU in, they will match them with Texas due to the Texas connection. If the leave Bama in, not sure they would match Bama and Texas.

And amazing that Penn State gets the 5 spot - but that is just to avoid the Penn State / Indiana match up.
 
#29
#29
Either they already know, or the city of Knoxville is actually VERY scum for this...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2797.png
    IMG_2797.png
    349.1 KB · Views: 23
  • IMG_2798.png
    IMG_2798.png
    350.1 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_2799.png
    IMG_2799.png
    289 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_2807.png
    IMG_2807.png
    338.9 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_2806.png
    IMG_2806.png
    339.3 KB · Views: 16
  • IMG_2805.png
    IMG_2805.png
    309.5 KB · Views: 25
#32
#32
If they do then why lied to everyone. Don’t think Bama gets in.

When did they lie? They never said SMU is in if they lose - in fact they said SMU could drop below Bama if SMU lost.

The committee never said the losers were guaranteed to be in. That was NEVER said. It was just social media talking heads.
 
#35
#35
Can anyone tell me why it will take 4 hours to explain a 12 team CFP and analysis of 1st Rd matches. How much BS could it be.
It is about $$$$ and commercials 4 hours
* Under/Over 32 Commercials in a 4 hour time frame.
I don't see it unless they get to shoe sizes of certain players.
All going against the NFL Sunday Show.
* Over/Under discussion of 17 minutes Alabama if they don't make the cut.

Committee's Chairman explanation of Rankings over/under 4.5 minutes with no plausible explanation.

It doesn't even take that long to announce the 64 team NCAA bracket!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BADGER_VOL
#42
#42
When did they lie? They never said SMU is in if they lose - in fact they said SMU could drop below Bama if SMU lost.

The committee never said the losers were guaranteed to be in. That was NEVER said. It was just social media talking heads.

Indirectly, they said no more data points for teams that didnt play yesterday.

For example, our loss to UGA is better now after SECCG; however, since we didnt get credit for that better loss, indirectly saying the games are worthless
 
#44
#44
Can anyone tell me why it will take 4 hours to explain a 12 team CFP and analysis of 1st Rd matches. How much BS could it be.
It is about $$$$ and commercials 4 hours
* Under/Over 32 Commercials in a 4 hour time frame.
I don't see it unless they get to shoe sizes of certain players.
All going against the NFL Sunday Show.
* Over/Under discussion of 17 minutes Alabama if they don't make the cut.

Committee's Chairman explanation of Rankings over/under 4.5 minutes with no plausible explanation.
I guess it’s all they have to do
 

VN Store



Back
Top