CFP Bracket Reveal 12est ESPN

#52
#52
BigOrangeMojo said:
Indirectly, they said no more data points for teams that didnt play yesterday.

For example, our loss to UGA is better now after SECCG; however, since we didnt get credit for that better loss, indirectly saying the games are worthless
Click to expand...

That is not what they said. They said no more data points for teams outside of the top 12 against the teams in the top 12 that would say allow Ole Miss to get in, Tennessee to rise above OSU, etc. The question where that was said was in relation to whether Ole Miss could move into the top 12.

They did say that the teams that played would be evaluated and with that evaluation is implies placement in the top 12 or being pushed out of the top 12 as a result of teams outside of the top 12 who played.
 
#55
#55
volfan102455 said:
That is not what they said. They said no more data points for teams outside of the top 12 against the teams in the top 12 that would say allow Ole Miss to get in, Tennessee to rise above OSU, etc. The question where that was said was in relation to whether Ole Miss could move into the top 12.

They did say that the teams that played would be evaluated and with that evaluation is implies placement in the top 12 or being pushed out of the top 12 as a result of teams outside of the top 12 who played.
Click to expand...

Its stupid logic

We got a data point yesterday. Our UGA loss was to a better team than we thought

OSU got one too. Their best win wasnt as good as previously thought since PSU lost.

The committee is now saying that this new data point doesnt exist for us since we or OSU didnt play.
 
#62
#62
volfan102455 said:
Actually I am not - I am for teams being evaluated properly.

And I know that if UNLV has beaten Boise State, they were out - so why is SMU special??
Click to expand...
Have you been like this all the other years when teams have gotten screwed? Bama is a 3 loss team so this doesn’t quite fit being screwed over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kungfuman2000
#65
#65
Clad in Big Orange said:
Booger is right! Who you lost to and how should matter also!
Click to expand...
And if it matters for bama, it should matter for ohio state. Their loss to miichigan is uglier than bama's loss to OK......and it was the last game they played.

Ohio State should be no higher than 9.......but they are.

Whatever happens, there will be no consistency; and that is the frustrating part.
It's like when one team is called for multiple holdings while the other team isn't flagged once.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RDU VOL#14, tbh and zeppelin128
#72
#72
luthervol said:
And if it matters for bama, it should matter for ohio state. Their loss to miichigan is uglier than bama's loss to OK......and it was the last game they played.

Ohio State should be no higher than 9.......but they are.

Whatever happens, there will be no consistency; and that is the frustrating part.
It's like when one team is called for multiple holdings while the other team isn't flagged once.
Click to expand...
The loss to Michigan is not as bad as the Bama loss to okie
 
  • Like
Reactions: KoachKrab127, Vol in Buckeye Land and I4Vols
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top