championship weekend......what say you?

#27
#27
jakez4ut said:
respect/fear.....the water gets muddy when trying to separate the two.:)

that must be volwindy talk for "you're right jake".:eek:lol:
Click to expand...

Nice try, but its more like volwindy talk for "Jake just said a bunch of nothing, lets just keep the response short so he knows he said something in his mind...":)
 
#28
#28
volwindy said:
Nice try, but its more like volwindy talk for "Jake just said a bunch of that i don't understand so i'm going to change the subject":)
Click to expand...
:thumbsup: just keeping it consistent with what i usually see.

have a wonderful day!
 
#29
#29
jakez4ut said:
while you're learning from mistakes, a la the panthers, ravens, dolphins, bills, browns, etc, etc, etc....are watching the proven veterans, a la packers and patriots, make deep runs in to the playoffs.:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

The Browns learned from one big mistake when they traded away Frye after the first game
 
#31
#31
jakez4ut said:
:thumbsup: just keeping it consistent with what i usually see.

have a wonderful day!
Click to expand...

Not true! Just stuff I don't particularly care about. :eek:k:


Oh and I see you are trying to be Finevol yet again. Good job Jake!!!
 
#33
#33
volwindy said:
Not true! Just stuff I don't particularly care about. :eek:k:


Oh and I see you are trying to be Finevol yet again. Good job Jake!!!
Click to expand...
yet you keep replying....hmm.......in accordance with your new avatar, you should change your sig for your avatar (like where mine says "keeping VN honest...") to "will always have the last word, whether i understand what i'm responding to or not".:thumbsup:
 
#34
#34
justingroves said:
:eek:lol:

Yep. I expect the Browns to be a contender for the AFC North next season.

They have a young, versatile offense and a decent D. The sky's the limit for the Dog Pound
Click to expand...
as much as i hate to admit it, you may be right. the steelers are getting older and at some point, there's going to be some major re shuffling on the defense and the O line. we have our work cut out for us if we're going to stay at the top.

that said, we've had the browns' number for several years now, just hoping that continues for the forseseable future.
 
#37
#37
jakez4ut said:
the falcons are a mess in general. i don't know that they're going to get a HC that they want, and it's looking like they are really close to just starting over completely. whoever takes over down there, it's going to be a project for the HC and the personnel already on hand. they have some good players, but they've lost their best players of late...Kearny was a big loss, and we all know about Vick. the best player on that team may be the TE. the secondary isn't bad, but i'm not convinced they have the "team" concept, esp #21.

looking at it now, all three teams in the south are better than the falcons if for no other reason, stability in the front office.

who are you referring to specifically?
Click to expand...


Alan Faneca the guard for the Steelers. Should have been a little more specific
 
#38
#38
if the browns are serious about trading Derek Anderson to make room for the Quinn era, there is no way they will be contenders for the North next season. I say that as a Quinn hater I know, but there is no way he can produce the same results.
 
#39
#39
jeez. i must be tired. i read falcons. not faneca. been reading too many volwindy posts i guess.:eek:lol:

back on point.......

i wish they'd keep him, he's the best o linemen on the team. but tehy're not going to pay him what he wants, so it's really just a formality of where he's going, not when. that said, he's not getting younger, and if anything, we've proven that we can replace notable players. Joey Porter and Antwan Randle El come to mind. they replaced both with draft picks (though neither were direct replacements--they moved Harrison up to Porters spot and drafted Timmons to take Harrison's spot as the back up, and drafted Holmes, and brought in Cedric Wilson thru free agency).

Faneca's shoes though will be bigger to fill than either of them, considering the overall play of the O line the last month and a half.
 
#40
#40
volfanbill said:
if the browns are serious about trading Derek Anderson to make room for the Quinn era, there is no way they will be contenders for the North next season. I say that as a Quinn hater I know, but there is no way he can produce the same results.
Click to expand...
they aren't going to do anything with anderson. i hope they do. but even they'r not that dumb.
 
#41
#41
jakez4ut said:
they aren't going to do anything with anderson. i hope they do. but even they'r not that dumb.
Click to expand...

Romeo said a couple of weeks they'd listen to offers. I'll try to find a link.

Edit: And here it is:

The Denver Post - Anderson trade? Browns will listen

It was interesting that Cleveland Browns coach Romeo Crennel said this week that the team would be willing to listen to trade offers for quarterback Derek Anderson.

Expect Crennel to get plenty. Teams that will be looking for quarterbacks include Miami, Kansas City, Baltimore, Carolina, Atlanta, Minnesota, Chicago and San Francisco. Anderson, a restricted free agent, has to be on the wish list of many teams after a breakout season for the Browns, who nearly made the playoffs.

Anderson should remain on the Browns' wish list, but Crennel's proclamation means the team likely is leaning toward going with Brady Quinn, who was drafted in the first round last year. Quinn is a fine prospect, but Anderson has shown he can lead the team. The Browns should stick with him.
Click to expand...
 
#42
#42
well then they are dumb. not that i'm complaining. i could live with DA being a Panther.
 
#45
#45
jakez4ut said:
yet you keep replying....hmm.......in accordance with your new avatar, you should change your sig for your avatar (like where mine says "keeping VN honest...") to "will always have the last word, whether i understand what i'm responding to or not".:thumbsup:
Click to expand...


Well I will always have the last word, that is true, but the understand or not is false, because I understood what you said, I just decided to end the crap route you were going on to end it with a Brady era. :clapping: Now if you want to keep arguing with me, you might end up where volsgal wants to. :eek:lol:




And by the way, you can never read enough volwindy posts!! :)
 
#46
#46
Wow there's no way I could read every post (plus I skipped over certain ones, I think we all know who's), but this comes down to a few select pints to me. I think GB's corners will shut down the Giant's WR's.. they're just too good. Also, I don't see the Giants having much of a pass rush in this game. Last, I think GB has the edge in rushing, and IMO that's what this game is going to come down to.
 
#47
#47
volwindy said:
Well I will always have the last word, that is true, but the understand or not is false, because I understood what you said, I just decided to end the crap route you were going on to end it with a Brady era. :clapping: Now if you want to keep arguing with me, you might end up where volsgal wants to. :eek:lol:




And by the way, you can never read enough volwindy posts!! :)
Click to expand...
sure, that was it. you decided. ok. thanks for responding.....again.....to something you could care less about...supposedly.:wink2:
 
#48
#48
volsforever27 said:
Wow there's no way I could read every post (plus I skipped over certain ones, I think we all know who's), but this comes down to a few select pints to me. I think GB's corners will shut down the Giant's WR's.. they're just too good. Also, I don't see the Giants having much of a pass rush in this game. Last, I think GB has the edge in rushing, and IMO that's what this game is going to come down to.
Click to expand...
GB's secondary is definitely better than the giants secndary, but they've given up big plays in the past as well. the running games....both can do it, i give the edge to the pack as well though. home feild, weather....blah, blah, blah.

one thing i agree with, if GB's pass rush is a factor, that's real bad for the Giants.
 
#49
#49
jakez4ut said:
GB's secondary is definitely better than the giants secndary, but they've given up big plays in the past as well. the running games....both can do it, i give the edge to the pack as well though. home feild, weather....blah, blah, blah.

one thing i agree with, if GB's pass rush is a factor, that's real bad for the Giants.
Click to expand...

It's hard for opposing teams to have much of a pass rush there in the winter, so yeah the edge def. goes to GB.
 
#50
#50
picking the giants to pull the upset. would love to see favre and brady but giants have too good of running game and i think giants will shut favre down. can see him having one of those 5 int. days. would definatly take +7.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top