clarksvol00
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2018
- Messages
- 8,004
- Likes
- 5,183
Has this actually happened or is it assumed that's the case? Why keep it a secret? If the .gov, for whatever reason, didn't want to go public about it there's still no reason not to knock the thing down when over a nowhere area. I can't fathom why this or any administration would tolerate a foreign device loitering in our airspace.
I don't want to give the impression that I think this is fine, but I do think there are some reasonable explanations. May or may not be correct, but you can certainly make a case for leaving it up.
There are huge balloons capable of reaching the edge of space, some dude parachuted out of one several years ago. Just saying "oh it's a balloon and it's over Montana, it won't hurt anything when it comes down" isn't feasible. That thing could be miles in the air, be the size of a bus, and subject to winds powerful enough to push it God knows where when you shoot it. We don't know what kind of surveillance equipment it has, what it is capable of observing or transmitting, but the government probably does. Is it possible that they may have made a risk/reward calculation that it just isn't going to collect enough information to make it worth shooting down? I bet if they shot it down and it went off course and landed on somebody, some of the same people wanting to shoot it down would go through the roof.