CountVolcula
Eternal Vol
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 32,490
- Likes
- 19,827
You're confusing Socialism as a black-and-white issue (which it's not). There are degrees of socialism and there is virtually no one in American politics who is against all of them. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Public Education, Public Television, FDA regulation, welfare, and so much more are all socialist institutions. As it stands I would consider myself a socialist unless it gets to the point where it's interfering with people's prosperity. Unlike some, I believe there is an acceptable degree of socialism that is actually beneficial, but like all good things you can have too much of it.
Hence, I support government health care with private insurance supplemental plans (like the Scandinavian model). Countries who use this blend of private and public services consistently rank in the top of health care quality world-wide. I also support public education, FDA, social security, and welfare. But I do not support collectivization of agriculture, for example. There are some industries that just run better when the government controls them, and some that run better when private industry does. Look at national defense, for example. And the postal service gets you mail pretty cheap.
Snake, you are nuts if you want gov't meddling in any thing!
The postal service is 8 billion in the hole!
Name on thing on the planet that is run effeciently by the gov't on any level.
I would but you would bring up some failing of it. Then you would make the mental analogy that because the government did it it failed. Of course in your mind's eye you would neglect the fact that any large enough organization, even corporations, run inefficiently because of their size, not their profit-seeking status.
Public Radio (no, "being liberal" is not a flaw, even though NPR is intellectual, not liberal)
That was very kind of you.NPR is both intellectual and liberal. I wouldn't consider them partisan but they definitely have a liberal (power inequalities are the issue) mentality. Stories are presented from the "disadvantaged's" perspective. If you content analyzed their coverage of issues where a 1st world country interacts with a 3rd world country or individuals interact with corporations you will more often then not find them representing the voice of the 3rd world country or individual.
I will let the craters, (in the 3 different interstates I travel everyday) speak for themselves.
NPR is both intellectual and liberal. I wouldn't consider them partisan but they definitely have a liberal (power inequalities are the issue) mentality. Stories are presented from the "disadvantaged's" perspective. If you content analyzed their coverage of issues where a 1st world country interacts with a 3rd world country or individuals interact with corporations you will more often then not find them representing the voice of the 3rd world country or individual.
Let me know whose fault those roads might be?Yes, obviously it's the government's fault
I forgot that Corporations always run things perfectly.
For people who seem awfully concerned with people who "blame america", y'all seem awfully quick to blame government first.
Blaming power inequalities for multigenerational shortcomings is absolutely a liberal idea, except where Asian Americans are concerned.
Let me know whose fault those roads might be?
You act as if we only tax for roads every once in a while.
The corporation silliness makes no sense. They have no ability to pass laws and coerce via said laws. Stupidity on their part doesn't bother me. Governmental caretaking bothers the hell out if me.
Let me know whose fault those roads might be?
You act as if we only tax for roads every once in a while.
The corporation silliness makes no sense. They have no ability to pass laws and coerce via said laws. Stupidity on their part doesn't bother me. Governmental caretaking bothers the hell out if me.