Clarence Thomas in Hot Water (Alito too!)

#701
#701
C-south said:
Guess he should’ve just been friends with Epstein.
Click to expand...
I'm not really sure how epstein is related to the fact that there is no ethics code or oversight for the supreme court, whether is Thomas, Sotomayor, or any other justice; but you are Smart Guy so I assume you'll explain it to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr Dread
#702
#702
CobbVol said:
I can and hopefully you as well. The issue is the media who cannot unless you can start pointing out the indepth investigative reporting on the other issues. Don't take it so personal.
Click to expand...
I'm not taking anything personal. I just think its bs that ethics issues at the supreme court, not just Thomas, but all justices are regulated only by those justices. Every other federal judge in the country has to adhere to a code of ethics. Screw ideology, make them accountable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol and volfanhill
#703
#703
clarksvol00 said:
I'm not taking anything personal. I just think its bs that ethics issues at the supreme court, not just Thomas, but all justices are regulated only by those justices. Every other federal judge in the country has to adhere to a code of ethics. Screw ideology, make them accountable.
Click to expand...
Agreed
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#704
#704
clarksvol00 said:
I'm not really sure how epstein is related to the fact that there is no ethics code or oversight for the supreme court, whether is Thomas, Sotomayor, or any other justice; but you are Smart Guy so I assume you'll explain it to me.
Click to expand...

Maybe it would be unethical if his friend benefited from SC rulings but I don’t believe that to be the case. It’s not like Thomas ran a foundation and offered favors to the highest donors.
 
#706
#706
clarksvol00 said:
I'm not taking anything personal. I just think its bs that ethics issues at the supreme court, not just Thomas, but all justices are regulated only by those justices. Every other federal judge in the country has to adhere to a code of ethics. Screw ideology, make them accountable.
Click to expand...

I assume you want the same level of accountability for these as well - correct? The media regulates themselves and their results leave a lot to be desired with these issues.

Joe Biden caught up in a pay-for-play scheme involving bribes from a foreign national in exchange for policy decisions.

IRS Whistleblower coming forward to incriminate Merrick Garland for blocking an investigation into Hunter Biden.

Antony Blinken committing brazen election interference by colluding with 51 former intel officials to lie about Hunter Biden's laptop just weeks before the 2020 election.
 
#707
#707
CobbVol said:
I assume you want the same level of accountability for these as well - correct?

Joe Biden caught up in a pay-for-play scheme involving bribes from a foreign national in exchange for policy decisions.

IRS Whistleblower coming forward to incriminate Merrick Garland for blocking an investigation into Hunter Biden.

Antony Blinken committing brazen election interference by colluding with 51 former intel officials to lie about Hunter Biden's laptop just weeks before the 2020 election.
Click to expand...

Perfect. Indict them, try them, convict them, punish them, if they're guilty. My question is why aren't the 9 Supreme court justices subject to the same ethics rules as every other judge in the country? Shouldn't be a partisan issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#708
#708
C-south said:
Maybe it would be unethical if his friend benefited from SC rulings but I don’t believe that to be the case. It’s not like Thomas ran a foundation and offered favors to the highest donors.
Click to expand...
His friend has contributed to or been a member of groups like the Club for Growth that have filed briefs in supreme court cases and Thomas has come down on the side of those parties. Doesn't matter the party, the justices shouldn't be accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars from people who are financing cases before them.
 
#709
#709
clarksvol00 said:
Perfect. Indict them, try them, convict them, punish them, if they're guilty. My question is why aren't the 9 Supreme court justices subject to the same ethics rules as every other judge in the country? Shouldn't be a partisan issue.
Click to expand...

No problem with the ethics rules for all the judges at every level.

The issue with the bold above is that the media does not investigate at the same level of intensity as to allow this to even potentially happen. Does this not bother you as well? Do you not know more about Clarence Thomas than our President potentially being compromised from foreign entities? Or why there is not more visibility with the IRS whistleblower and what they have to say? Or the role of SOS Blinken in potentially attempting to sweep the Hunter Biden laptop story under the rug before an election using our intel officials? Having a more robust honest media should not be a partisan issue.
 
#710
#710
CobbVol said:
No problem with the ethics rules for all the judges at every level.

The issue with the bold above is that the media does not investigate at the same level of intensity as to allow this to even potentially happen. Does this not bother you as well? Do you not know more about Clarence Thomas than our President potentially being compromised from foreign entities? Or why there is not more visibility with the IRS whistleblower and what they have to say? Or the role of SOS Blinken in potentially attempting to sweep the Hunter Biden laptop story under the rug before an election using our intel officials? Having a more robust honest media should not be a partisan issue.
Click to expand...
So now the issue isn't the supreme court, but the media? I saw Sotomayor has a questionable book deal today. So do we need to excuse scotus for excluding themselves from ethics rules or not?
 
#711
#711
clarksvol00 said:
So now the issue isn't the supreme court, but the media? I saw Sotomayor has a questionable book deal today. So do we need to excuse scotus for excluding themselves from ethics rules or not?
Click to expand...

Like I just said, I have no problem with the ethics rule. Do you not see it in my post above? The whole point of Kirk's tweet that I brought to the board was the intense focus on Thomas at the expense of all the items he listed. Can you not admit you know more from the media on Thomas than the other items? Maybe more on THomas than all of them combined.
 
#712
#712
CobbVol said:
Not at the expense of the 7 items Charlie Kirk listed above. To help your further, Charlie is pointing out the laser like focus of the media on this issue at the expense of the other important issues where the investigations for truth and oversight are much less.
Click to expand...

The drone attack on the Kremlin has been covered by the media.
The banking stories have been covered.
The Biden "bribery" story is a conspiracy theory with no facts attached.
I'm sure the military recruitment story has been covered. Is the military enlisting a lot of "drag queens"? Is this a major problem? I'll take a
wild guess and say it's not an issue at all.

And, finally, Charlie Kirk is an idiot--seriously.
 
#715
#715
rekinhavoc said:
Here Are The Times Liberal Justices Had Political Entanglements That Were Largely Ignored By Democrats
Click to expand...

The democratic party and their media slaves are racist in their attack only on Justics Thomas. Fact. If this was truly an issue they wanted to address to the public, then a balanced article highlighting situations with all justices would have been written. Sad that they cannot contain their racial characteristics that is inherent in almost everything they attempt.
 
#716
#716
"I sought guidance from my colleagues and others in the judiciary, and was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the court, was not reportable,” - Clarence Thomas

A justice of the Supreme Court doesn't understand the laws and rules that govern his office. And we rely on him to interpret the laws that govern our nation? Justice Thomas stands naked before us IMO.
 
#717
#717
Hunerwadel said:
"I sought guidance from my colleagues and others in the judiciary, and was advised that this sort of personal hospitality from close personal friends, who did not have business before the court, was not reportable,” - Clarence Thomas

A justice of the Supreme Court doesn't understand the laws and rules that govern his office. And we rely on him to interpret the laws that govern our nation? Justice Thomas stands naked before us IMO.
Click to expand...

Yet KJB cannot define a woman...so how is she to make affected rulings?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top