85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 32,028
- Likes
- 62,795
That is a lie ... Just saying "whore" implies a sexual connotation. "Attention-whore" can describe anyone who is a publicity hound like Ginni Thomas. She revels in her press coverage.Well I’m sure he’ll chalk that up as a win. Still called her a “whore”. Which is what I said.
He’s still the one in here talking about Clarence Thomas’ “whore” wife that he needs to “reign in” and get in line.
And he hasn’t even really started in on Clarence yet. That’s when the fireworks really start.
See my edit. My position is that Ginni Thomas can do what she wants. Clarence needs to keep out of cases that may involve her. Or the two of them need to mutually decide how to proceed so that these issues don't arise.Well I’m sure he’ll chalk that up as a win. Still called her a “whore”. Which is what I said.
He’s still the one in here talking about Clarence Thomas’ “whore” wife that he needs to “reign in” and get in line.
And he hasn’t even really started in on Clarence yet. That’s when the fireworks really start.
Attention-whore is slang for "obsessive publicity seeker." It doesn't involve a sexual component.You do realize “whore” is quite literally a component of “attention whore”, right?
I’m well aware of what it means. It’s derogatory. Just your game.Attention-whore is slang for "obsessive publicity seeker." It doesn't involve a sexual component.
Now, if I cared about being discreet, I would have called her an "obsessive publicity seeker," but since I don't care about being discreet ... I called her an "attention-whore." I offer no apologies for it either. It's a fair description of her.
Sorry ... but with all of the derogatory things said about Michelle Obama on a regular basis on this forum, you can't make me feel guilty about calling Ginni Thomas an "attention-whore."If we're ranking them on the level of offensiveness I'd say attention-whore is probably less than the other three.
Edit: still not something I'd throw around though.
I don't believe that calling Ginni Thomas an "attention-whore" is ugly ... it's accurate (if indiscreet).So you’re blaming your ugliness on the ugliness of others? Mighty impressive.
Oh you’re completely innocent in the Clarence & Ginni Thomas arena of comments? Just being picked on here?I don't believe that calling Ginni Thomas an "attention-whore" is ugly ... it's accurate (if indiscreet).
It is telling that you are objecting to it, though ... when I have never seen you object to Michelle Obama's physical appearance being compared to that of a gorilla, or whenever she is routinely referred to as being a tranny.
I am curious about your opinion on all the "Big Mike" comments.Oh you’re completely innocent in the Clarence & Ginni Thomas arena of comments? Just being picked on here?
This has actually been pretty tame by your standards. You’re usually much more offensive than this.
What else have you had to say about Clarence & Ginni Thomas in the past? Care to share sone of your greatest hits?
I've never said anything about Clarence Thomas, which hasn't also been said by an African-American in Congress.Oh you’re completely innocent in the Clarence & Ginni Thomas arena of comments? Just being picked on here?
This has actually been pretty tame by your standards. You’re usually much more offensive than this.
What else have you had to say about Clarence & Ginni Thomas in the past? Care to share sone of your greatest hits?
Point one out (yes, I know there are many) and I’ll comment on it.I am curious about your opinion on all the "Big Mike" comments.
I don't know BB's history with Clarence Thomas, and I don't think you'd call M. Obama a gorilla or tyranny, but it's a fairly common thing on the forum that doesn't get much attention, while there does seem to be concern over BB's comment.Point one out (yes, I know there are many) and I’ll comment on it.
Fairly confident there aren’t any posts from me referring to her as a “gorilla or a tranny”.
Calling out all the racism on this board sounds exhausting. Not one poster here does that.
But you bet I call out posters who claim to be the “least racist person here”. Especially in the Clarence Thomas thread. Especially when they have a history of hurling incredibly racist and derogatory insults at Clarence Thomas.
I try to leave you alone for the most part…..and I take no issue with “attention Whore”. It’s not the same as calling someone a Whore. Here’s the “But”….others bad behavior would not excuse your bad behavior (if there had been any).Sorry ... but with all of the derogatory things said about Michelle Obama on a regular basis on this forum, you can't make me feel guilty about calling Ginni Thomas an "attention-whore."