Clarence Thomas in Hot Water (Alito too!)

#978
#978
BowlBrother85 said:
No. The subject at hand has matured considerably, and is fixated on Michelle Obama's physical appearance at the moment.

@85SugarVol ... How about another lecture on the incivility of calling Ginni Thomas an "attention whore?"
Click to expand...
Sorry, she's butt ugly, and her hubby dreams about sex with men. Facts. That is all I was speaking to. Why do leftists try to change the subject when people reference FACTS? Answer: Leftist argument always breaks down once fact is introduced into the conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
#979
#979
BowlBrother85 said:
No. The subject at hand has matured considerably, and is fixated on Michelle Obama's physical appearance at the moment.

@85SugarVol ... How about another lecture on the incivility of calling Ginni Thomas an "attention whore?"
Click to expand...
You must be lathered up and ready again?

I tagged the first one already. All of it is wrong though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
#980
#980
Tman44 said:
Sorry, she's butt ugly, and her hubby dreams about sex with men. Facts. That is all I was speaking to. Why do leftists try to change the subject when people reference FACTS? Answer: Leftist argument always breaks down once fact is introduced into the conversation.
Click to expand...
... and you possess the refined intellect and discipline of a learned scholar.
 
#982
#982
Supreme Court 'ethics' Activist Admits Lobbying Disclosure Failure: 'I have been corrected'

The head of a Supreme Court "transparency" watchdog helping to spearhead a campaign alleging ethics violations among justices, including Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, admitted his group failed to disclose its own lobbying.

Tax attorneys told the Washington Examiner in July it appeared that Fix the Court, a charity formerly a project of New Venture Fund, a liberal nonprofit group managed by the dark money organization and for-profit consultancy Arabella Advisors, likely skirted federal law in 2021 and 2022 due to not reporting activities on financial disclosures that constitute grassroots lobbying. Fix the Court Executive Director Gabe Roth has now come clean following those allegations, noting, "I have been corrected."


Supreme Court 'ethics' activist admits lobbying disclosure failure: 'I have been corrected'
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf
#984
#984
newsbusters.org

Wall Street Journal vs. CNN, Pro Publica On Justice Thomas

Talk about refreshing. Let’s get real. From the moment of his 1991 nomination to the US Supreme Court by President George H.W. Bush, Clarence Thomas was a target for the media. For those who came in late, then-Justice Thurgood Marshall had made known his decision to retire in the summer of 1991...
newsbusters.org newsbusters.org

"One reason Americans don’t trust the media is that politically biased reporters routinely adulterate the news with tendentious language and prepackaged opinions. The result is crude propaganda—lousy opinion writing and unreliable information rolled into one and deceptively packaged as straight news."

"And it’s notable too that when President Biden nominated Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as the first black woman to be on the Supreme Court, the media swooned. Yet, tellingly, just as with Clarence Thomas, when then-Senator Biden tried to block George W. Bush’s nomination of another black female jurist - Judge Janice Rogers Brown -to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the media yawned. Why? Because, of course, like Justice Thomas, Rogers was a conservative."
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
#987
#987
evillawyer said:
More fun corruption stuff from Thomas.

MAGA, b*tches!

Click to expand...


uhhhh....they brought him in to speak, at an event? Someone paid for his air travel and lodgings? I assume they paid him something for showing up also.

Confused as to what the problem is. Every one of the Justices does this sort of thing. Not all get a private jet to fly them there of course.

I dont see the issue since he is not actually doing the fundraising. I still think it is unwise, however, because they may be bringing matters before the court where he would need to recuse himself.

We used to have our judges and judicial candidates avoid strictly party affairs but it was not unusual for them to come to party sponsored events to speak and we would give them awards. Granted, we were sure as heck raising money at these events but the judge was not allowed to speak for any candidate or even for the party itself actually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#991
#991
Is it just me, or do other folks think that the back of his chair in this picture resembles something else that's taking dead aim at his face?

 
#995
#995
hUTch2002 said:
So this is bad but Joe dining with Hunter’s business associates that Joe claimed to know nothing about is all good.

Hypocrisy b*tches!
Click to expand...
You stepped in it love. Wouldn't the hypocrisy be the GOP opening an impeachment inquiry on Biden for influence peddling but not doing so on Thomas?
 
#997
#997
hUTch2002 said:
Sure, can’t have it both ways. Now, back to your hypocrisy love.
Click to expand...
Not so fast love. There IS an impeachment inquiry for Biden. If you're a principled man -- and I'm sure you are, as all Trump leg-humpers are -- I'm sure you're screaming into the void about there being no impeachment inquiry yet for Thomas. Right? Right?
 
#998
#998
evillawyer said:
Not so fast love. There IS an impeachment inquiry for Biden. If you're a principled man -- and I'm sure you are, as all Trump leg-humpers are -- I'm sure you're screaming into the void about there being no impeachment inquiry yet for Thomas. Right? Right?
Click to expand...
Nope. That’s for others to do, I really don’t care. What’s hilarious though is you think there’s any high ground to be had. Good luck with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top