Climate Change Report

#2,704
#2,704
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, NEO, allvol123 and 1 other person
#2,705
#2,705
85SugarVol said:
Even if we were facing imminent doom (we’re not)
Even if we knew what to do (we don’t)

Could we even get it done?

I doubt it. We can’t handle the Flu.
Click to expand...

NO ! There are things we don’t even think about and have no way to replace them . Climate change is all about money and one of the biggest money grab scams in history . Inland we don’t have an electrical grid that can handle swaping from fossil fuels , there’s no replacement for coal that supplies our electricity, saying wind farms and solar can is a lie . Off shore ..

2CE0ECB1-6152-4B7C-82B1-E35A3EB208DE.jpeg

33F22956-9873-440A-8940-84ECADD1DE97.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne and allvol123
#2,707
#2,707
Every time man starts to get involved in matters that shouldn’t be meddled in. It gets worse. like meddling with the eco system. We need to do something about the population of rabbits, Let’s add more coyotes. The coyote population skyrockets, hey, we need to add wolves to thin the coyotes. And, it goes on and on and on.

there have been hot times during our past. We’ve had droughts and we’ve had times it has flooded. And, man shouldn’t be trying to fix it because they can’t.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: turdherder11, marcusluvsvols and VolinWayne
#2,708
#2,708
It was many moons ago, on this very board, that I made the argument that the Covid Response would color the Climate Change conversation for years to come.

I was laughed at by a good number on here.

Any y’all caught up yet?


(And for the record - it is going to impact the Guns in America conversation too)
 
#2,709
#2,709
First we were all gonna freeze to death they said in the 70s...

Then came the 80s and CFCs in aerosols were gonna fry us all...

Then in the 90s "global warming" would have coastal cities like Miami under water by 2020...

Nobody listened to the Chicken Littles so in the 2000s they changed the name to "climate change"...

FACTS: Empirical data shows Earths climate is CYCLICAL with an ICE AGE about every 20,000 years. Between those ICE AGES it gets HOT as HELL.

The LAST ICE AGE was about 10,000 years ago. Fact.



This always falls on deaf ears though because shrub hugger liberals have too much free time but cannot seem to grasp these undisputed climate facts....

So I DREW YOU A PICTURE to help you dense folks understand:
 

Attachments

  • 20220725_130842.jpg
    20220725_130842.jpg
    845 KB · Views: 12
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77, UT_Dutchman, loggervol and 4 others
#2,711
#2,711
0nelilreb said:
NO ! There are things we don’t even think about and have no way to replace them . Climate change is all about money and one of the biggest money grab scams in history . Inland we don’t have an electrical grid that can handle swaping from fossil fuels , there’s no replacement for coal that supplies our electricity, saying wind farms and solar can is a lie . Off shore ..

View attachment 475240

View attachment 475241
Click to expand...
How does one get 22.38 pounds of carbon dioxide from a 7 1/4 pound gallon of diesel??
Inquiring minds wish to know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loggervol, Orangeburst, 0nelilreb and 2 others
#2,712
#2,712
tnutater said:
How does one get 22.38 pounds of carbon dioxide from a 7 1/4 pound gallon of diesel??
Inquiring minds wish to know.
Click to expand...

Yeah I ignored that part , it was the amount of diesel being used that people just don’t talk about because we don’t have a replacement for it . There’s just no way to spin it into green energy . I believe that’s why they want a carbon footprint tax so badly .
 
#2,714
#2,714
tnutater said:
How does one get 22.38 pounds of carbon dioxide from a 7 1/4 pound gallon of diesel??
Inquiring minds wish to know.
Click to expand...


My thoughts exactly.

The Law of conservation of mass/energy demands that mass is neither created nor destroyed...so how does this mass roughly TRIPLE from 7.25 to 23lbs?

Hmmmmm
 
#2,719
#2,719
Weezy said:
Have we ever done something in the past and not been able to do it as efficiently in the future? There's no real reason we can't do a nuclear build out when we did it 50 years ago. The problem is unnecessarily high safety standards, burdensome regulatory structures, and a culture of paperwork over real work and change billing as lifeblood.
Click to expand...

No, it's literally cost and engineers. I was on an energy list for years with a bunch of PhD's and engineers that follow this topic closely. My daughter, also a PhD, is publishing a book soon about the evolution of the nuclear power industry in the American South, and we discuss this often. It's really hard to find enough qualified people to build the number of plants we need in order to meet demand.
 
#2,721
#2,721
Woodrow Call said:
No, it's literally cost and engineers. I was on an energy list for years with a bunch of PhD's and engineers that follow this topic closely. My daughter, also a PhD, is publishing a book soon about the evolution of the nuclear power industry in the American South, and we discuss this often. It's really hard to find enough qualified people to build the number of plants we need in order to meet demand.
Click to expand...

Can we start with One?
 
#2,722
#2,722
Woodrow Call said:
No, it's literally cost and engineers. I was on an energy list for years with a bunch of PhD's and engineers that follow this topic closely. My daughter, also a PhD, is publishing a book soon about the evolution of the nuclear power industry in the American South, and we discuss this often. It's really hard to find enough qualified people to build the number of plants we need in order to meet demand.
Click to expand...

I'd say it is hard to find the people because few go into the field since the .gov has made building a nuclear plant damn near impossible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#2,723
#2,723
hog88 said:
I'd say it is hard to find the people because few go into the field since the .gov has made building a nuclear plant damn near impossible.
Click to expand...

Dang obsolescence of the industry just by the inactivity. Same thing they are trying to do with oil..Good luck with an engine mechanic in 2040.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland and hog88
#2,724
#2,724
hog88 said:
I'd say it is hard to find the people because few go into the field since the .gov has made building a nuclear plant damn near impossible.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure there's enough evidence to say it's the government's fault. It's just hard to fund. Manchin wants to maintain coal dependency until he croaks. But nuclear is a potential way out, and natural gas is a big improvement. If nuclear became part of a broad based plan, some plan where government and private industry actually worked together, there'd be more students looking to become nuclear engineers. We need a plan like the New Deal in its size and scope, and lord knows we need to expand our manufacturing base in America. That's a huge reason we've seen an erosion of the middle class in America.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top