We should be a better program and a better team than Duke, UNC, Va. Tech, Indiana, Iowa and all the programs that have won nothing
in WBB while we have eight national titles. Harper and her staff SHOULD be capitalizing and leveraging on our pedigree, on our tradition--just as, on the men's side, UNC, Duke, Kansas and UConn capitalize and leverage their tradition year and year. She hasn't.
And if Harper can't take advantage of our pedigree, then we need to find a coach who can. Yes, we squandered some of our program cachet during the Warlick years--made a bad hire--and perhaps that has made climbing back up the ladder more challenging. But the tradition and pedigree are still there; they haven't gone anywhere. The banners still hang from the ceiling. The tradition is an asset that other programs don't have, and we need a coach who can take advantage of it, make something of it. That was the goal, and should have been the goal, when Harper was hired. But there's been almost no real progress. We lose to almost every quality team we play. Are we supposed to be pleased that she has done about the same as Lawson at Duke--a relatively inexperienced coach at a program with no tradition? That would be like fans of the Kansas men's program being pleased that their coach as done as well as the relatively new coach at Mississippi State. A lower perfornance level over the last many years should not lower expections or our standard. We muddle along, year after year. We're an also-ran, and that should not be acceptable.