Coaching Rankings.

#477
#477
TN-gator-HATER said:
Oh ok, LOL. Your sir are a joke. So I'm supposed to believe that this document exist because you " saw it with your own eyes" but their is no reference of it online anywhere. The internet holds a plethora of information on almost any topic, when i search "tiger woods adultery" or "bill clinton adultery" plenty of credible sources appear. Yet when I search "bruce pearl adultery" zero credible sources appear, all links returned are blog sites. I've done my own research, and it returned nothing of any substance, so until you, or someone else on this board links a credible source it will continue to be rumors. Once again, if someone links this source I will be more than happy to admit that I was wrong.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Pearl is paying exorbinant alimony out of the goodness of his heart. It has nothing to do with the fact the failure of his marriage is all his fault.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#479
#479
TN-gator-HATER said:
Oh ok, LOL. Your sir are a joke. So I'm supposed to believe that this document exist because you " saw it with your own eyes" but their is no reference of it online anywhere. The internet holds a plethora of information on almost any topic, when i search "tiger woods adultery" or "bill clinton adultery" plenty of credible sources appear. Yet when I search "bruce pearl adultery" zero credible sources appear, all links returned are blog sites. I've done my own research, and it returned nothing of any substance, so until you, or someone else on this board links a credible source it will continue to be rumors. Once again, if someone links this source I will be more than happy to admit that I was wrong.
Click to expand...


Were you in China studying to be a monk the last few years? Just wondering how you could NOT know these things have transpired.
 
#480
#480
Lofton4Three said:
Were you in a cave for the past couple years?

Don't answer that. I already know.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

You can make all the wise-cracks you want to deflect attention from the question, but it still remains that you said it existed and it has yet to appear.
 
#482
#482
TN-gator-HATER said:
You can make all the wise-cracks you want to deflect attention from the question, but it still remains that you said it existed and it has yet to appear.
Click to expand...

You seriously can not be that stupid.

Surely. But seriously, do your own research.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#483
#483
hatvol96 said:
I can see why a simpleton who nobody respects would enjoy that.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

We all forget that you are the country's top divorce laywer!!! Guys, he has the inside track on Bruce Pearl's situation. Hell, I heard he even represented the ol lady. It is really tough respecting someone who, from what I have seen so far, is continually wrong. Not just wrong, but outrageoulsy off-base with certain predictions. On some things regarding the game itself you are dead on. But when it comes to evaluating talent, I would take Marc Maggard's opinion over your own.

Sincerely,
mm
 
#484
#484
TN-gator-HATER said:
You can make all the wise-cracks you want to deflect attention from the question, but it still remains that you said it existed and it has yet to appear.
Click to expand...

I'm interested in what exactly you think happened and why his ex-wife has a booming little beauty salon called Alimony's now?:unsure:
 
#485
#485
hatvol96 said:
Yeah, Pearl is paying exorbinant alimony out of the goodness of his heart. It has nothing to do with the fact the failure of his marriage is all his fault.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Im certainly not denying the FACT that BP got a divorce.

Tennessee men’s basketball coach Bruce Pearl said Monday that he filed for divorce from his wife of 25 years, Kim, last Monday, Sept. 10.

"This is a very difficult time for my family and me," Pearl, 47, said in a statement. "It is my hope that everyone will understand that this is a personal matter and respect our privacy."

Pearl chose to delay the announcement because one of his children celebrated a birthday late last week.

The third-year Vols’ head coach separated from his 50-year-old wife after the team returned from an 11-day trip to Europe that took place Aug. 8-19. The divorce was filed in Knox County Chancery Court on the grounds of irreconcilable differences, according to the filing papers.

Irreconcilable Differences:
Differences between a married couple that are so huge and cannot be solved so as to make the marriage work.In such a case granting a divorce is the only solution and is considered a no-fault divorce as both the parties are equally responsible for the end of the marriageHowever, "irreconcilable differences" hardly is proof that he cheated on his wife. Once again, if a credible source is linked with proof that he cheated on his wife, I will admit being wrong. Until then its not happening.
 
#487
#487
tigervol9802 said:
I'm interested in what exactly you think happened and why his ex-wife has a booming little beauty salon called Alimony's now?:unsure:
Click to expand...

SPORTSbyBROOKS Bruce Pearl’s Ex-Wife Is Taking The Divorce Well

Shrigley is a nurse by trade, but decided that opening the salon would allow here some flexibility to take care of her kids. And, of course, it’s an opportunity to remind Pearl on a daily basis what a dog he is, based on this quote:

The business’s name, Alimony’s, is written on the store front with green cursive and a red heart on top of the “i.”

“The heart up there is to be that extra pain in the ass,” she said with a laugh.

The report also says that clients receiving alimony get a 15% discount.

But what could Bruce have possibly done wrong to earn such wrath? Oh, maybe this has something to do with it:


c689c7e6b4ce31fb43d15ce25e1e9c46_brucepearlgirls.jpg
 
#488
#488
TN-gator-HATER said:
Im certainly not denying the FACT that BP got a divorce.

Tennessee men’s basketball coach Bruce Pearl said Monday that he filed for divorce from his wife of 25 years, Kim, last Monday, Sept. 10.

"This is a very difficult time for my family and me," Pearl, 47, said in a statement. "It is my hope that everyone will understand that this is a personal matter and respect our privacy."

Pearl chose to delay the announcement because one of his children celebrated a birthday late last week.

The third-year Vols’ head coach separated from his 50-year-old wife after the team returned from an 11-day trip to Europe that took place Aug. 8-19. The divorce was filed in Knox County Chancery Court on the grounds of irreconcilable differences, according to the filing papers.

Irreconcilable Differences:
Differences between a married couple that are so huge and cannot be solved so as to make the marriage work.In such a case granting a divorce is the only solution and is considered a no-fault divorce as both the parties are equally responsible for the end of the marriageHowever, "irreconcilable differences" hardly is proof that he cheated on his wife. Once again, if a credible source is linked with proof that he cheated on his wife, I will admit being wrong. Until then its not happening.
Click to expand...
Keep living in that nice, naive bubble you've got going. It keeps the cold, cruel world from interjecting reality into your fairy tale.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#491
#491
hatvol96 said:
Keep living in that nice, naive bubble you've got going. It keeps the cold, cruel world from interjecting reality into your fairy tale.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Yep. Divorcing because of Irreconcilable Differences pertaining to something small or "normal" doesn't result in one of the parties opening a business with that name, and throwing it in your face to publicly humiliate you.

He got busted gettin' some stinky pinky, and it come back to bite him in the arse.
 
#492
#492
hatvol96 said:
Keep living in that nice, naive bubble you've got going. It keeps the cold, cruel world from interjecting reality into your fairy tale.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Im simply going off of facts, im not being naive. Irreconcilable differences could be a variety of things, you of all people, being the legal professional that you are ,should know this. Facts are all that matter, assumptions mean nothing. In your case against BP, you are not proving "beyond a reasonable doubt" that he cheated on his wife.
 
#493
#493
Hardwood_fanatic said:
Yep. Divorcing because of Irreconcilable Differences pertaining to something small or "normal" doesn't result in one of the parties opening a business with that name, and throwing it in your face to publicly humiliate you.

He got busted gettin' some stinky pinky, and it come back to bite him in the arse.
Click to expand...
It also doesn't result in one of the parties stroking a huge alimony check every month.
 
#494
#494
TN-gator-HATER said:
Im simply going off of facts, im not being naive. Irreconcilable differences could be a variety of things, you of all people, being the legal professional that you are ,should know this. Facts are all that matter, assumptions mean nothing. In your case against BP, you are not proving "beyond a reasonable doubt" that he cheated on his wife.
Click to expand...

Have you noticed you've not had anyone step up to be a witness for you?

Just sticking with your courtroom theme.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#495
#495
TN-gator-HATER said:
Im simply going off of facts, im not being naive. Irreconcilable differences could be a variety of things, you of all people, being the legal professional that you are ,should know this. Facts are all that matter, assumptions mean nothing. In your case against BP, you are not proving "beyond a reasonable doubt" that he cheated on his wife.
Click to expand...
I'm not assuming anything. Clean hands don't write alimony checks.
 
#496
#496
hatvol96 said:
I'm not assuming anything. Clean hands don't write alimony checks.
Click to expand...

Oh Really? Once again, FACTS say otherwise:

In Texas, Mississippi and Tennessee for example, alimony is awarded only in cases of marriage or civil union of ten years or longer and the payments are limited to three years unless there are special, extenuating circumstances. Furthermore, the amount of spousal support is limited to the lesser of $2,500 per month or 40% of the payee's gross income.[

Pearl was married for 25 years therefore his wife qualifies for alimony.

Factors That Court Consider in Awarding Alimony in Tennessee:

•The relative earning capacity, obligations, needs, and financial resources of each party, including income from pension, profit-sharing or retirement plans and all other sources;
•The relative education and training of each party, the ability and opportunity of each party to secure such education and training, and the necessity of a party to secure further education and training to improve such party's earning capacity to a reasonable level;
•The duration of the marriage;
•The age and mental condition of each party;
•The physical condition of each party, including, but not limited to, physical disability or incapacity due to a chronic, debilitating disease;
•The extent to which it would be undesirable for a party to seek employment outside the home because such party will be custodian of a minor child of the marriage;
•The separate assets of each party, both real and personal, tangible and intangible;
•Marital property division;
•The standard of living of the parties established during the marriage;
•The extent to which each party has made such tangible and intangible contributions to the marriage as monetary and homemaker contributions, and tangible and intangible contributions by a party to the education, training or increased earning power of the other party;
•The relative fault (who is more to blame) of the parties in cases where the court, in its discretion, deems it appropriate to do so; and
•Such other factors, including the tax consequences to each party, as are necessary to consider the equities between the parties. So basically, everything. Appellate courts often say that need and ability to pay are the two most basic and important factors. (Do not rule out relative fault of the parties as a very important factor.)
 
#497
#497
TN-gator-HATER said:
Oh Really? Once again, FACTS say otherwise:

In Texas, Mississippi and Tennessee for example, alimony is awarded only in cases of marriage or civil union of ten years or longer and the payments are limited to three years unless there are special, extenuating circumstances. Furthermore, the amount of spousal support is limited to the lesser of $2,500 per month or 40% of the payee's gross income.[

Pearl was married for 25 years therefore his wife qualifies for alimony.

Factors That Court Consider in Awarding Alimony in Tennessee:

•The relative earning capacity, obligations, needs, and financial resources of each party, including income from pension, profit-sharing or retirement plans and all other sources;
•The relative education and training of each party, the ability and opportunity of each party to secure such education and training, and the necessity of a party to secure further education and training to improve such party's earning capacity to a reasonable level;
•The duration of the marriage;
•The age and mental condition of each party;
•The physical condition of each party, including, but not limited to, physical disability or incapacity due to a chronic, debilitating disease;
•The extent to which it would be undesirable for a party to seek employment outside the home because such party will be custodian of a minor child of the marriage;
•The separate assets of each party, both real and personal, tangible and intangible;
•Marital property division;
•The standard of living of the parties established during the marriage;
•The extent to which each party has made such tangible and intangible contributions to the marriage as monetary and homemaker contributions, and tangible and intangible contributions by a party to the education, training or increased earning power of the other party;
•The relative fault (who is more to blame) of the parties in cases where the court, in its discretion, deems it appropriate to do so; and
•Such other factors, including the tax consequences to each party, as are necessary to consider the equities between the parties. So basically, everything. Appellate courts often say that need and ability to pay are the two most basic and important factors. (Do not rule out relative fault of the parties as a very important factor.)
Click to expand...
Come on man... Just let it go.
 
#498
#498
TN-gator-HATER said:
Oh Really? Once again, FACTS say otherwise:

In Texas, Mississippi and Tennessee for example, alimony is awarded only in cases of marriage or civil union of ten years or longer and the payments are limited to three years unless there are special, extenuating circumstances. Furthermore, the amount of spousal support is limited to the lesser of $2,500 per month or 40% of the payee's gross income.[

Factors That Court Consider in Awarding Alimony in Tennessee:

•The relative earning capacity, obligations, needs, and financial resources of each party, including income from pension, profit-sharing or retirement plans and all other sources;
•The relative education and training of each party, the ability and opportunity of each party to secure such education and training, and the necessity of a party to secure further education and training to improve such party's earning capacity to a reasonable level;
•The duration of the marriage;
•The age and mental condition of each party;
•The physical condition of each party, including, but not limited to, physical disability or incapacity due to a chronic, debilitating disease;
•The extent to which it would be undesirable for a party to seek employment outside the home because such party will be custodian of a minor child of the marriage;
•The separate assets of each party, both real and personal, tangible and intangible;
•Marital property division;
•The standard of living of the parties established during the marriage;
•The extent to which each party has made such tangible and intangible contributions to the marriage as monetary and homemaker contributions, and tangible and intangible contributions by a party to the education, training or increased earning power of the other party;
•The relative fault (who is more to blame) of the parties in cases where the court, in its discretion, deems it appropriate to do so; and
•Such other factors, including the tax consequences to each party, as are necessary to consider the equities between the parties. So basically, everything. Appellate courts often say that need and ability to pay are the two most basic and important factors. (Do not rule out relative fault of the parties as a very important factor.)
Click to expand...
I love it. You're actually attempting to argue the law, which it is patently obvious you don't remotely understand. Believe what you want. It must help you sleep at night. I'll choose to hang out in the real world.
 
#499
#499
TN-gator-HATER said:
Oh Really? Once again, FACTS say otherwise:

In Texas, Mississippi and Tennessee for example, alimony is awarded only in cases of marriage or civil union of ten years or longer and the payments are limited to three years unless there are special, extenuating circumstances. Furthermore, the amount of spousal support is limited to the lesser of $2,500 per month or 40% of the payee's gross income.[

Pearl was married for 25 years therefore his wife qualifies for alimony.

Factors That Court Consider in Awarding Alimony in Tennessee:

•The relative earning capacity, obligations, needs, and financial resources of each party, including income from pension, profit-sharing or retirement plans and all other sources;
•The relative education and training of each party, the ability and opportunity of each party to secure such education and training, and the necessity of a party to secure further education and training to improve such party's earning capacity to a reasonable level;
•The duration of the marriage;
•The age and mental condition of each party;
•The physical condition of each party, including, but not limited to, physical disability or incapacity due to a chronic, debilitating disease;
•The extent to which it would be undesirable for a party to seek employment outside the home because such party will be custodian of a minor child of the marriage;
•The separate assets of each party, both real and personal, tangible and intangible;
•Marital property division;
•The standard of living of the parties established during the marriage;
•The extent to which each party has made such tangible and intangible contributions to the marriage as monetary and homemaker contributions, and tangible and intangible contributions by a party to the education, training or increased earning power of the other party;
•The relative fault (who is more to blame) of the parties in cases where the court, in its discretion, deems it appropriate to do so; and
•Such other factors, including the tax consequences to each party, as are necessary to consider the equities between the parties. So basically, everything. Appellate courts often say that need and ability to pay are the two most basic and important factors. (Do not rule out relative fault of the parties as a very important factor.)
Click to expand...

How dare you argue Hat's opinion. That kinda sh!t will get you banned; be careful, tread lightly.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top