Really? Why? Did the committee pick the 4 best teams?
If it's 4 best, where is UGA? Who in the final four would they not be favored over on a neutral field? The lines with OSU in the mix would be interesting as well.
Conference champion means nothing when you are deciding the “4 best teams”. They didn’t say “4 best conference champion teams”
Through all the other things the NCAA gets money for. FBS College football postseason (not FCS note the difference) is unique. The NCAA doesn't own or organize the bowl games or playoffs. Those are separate entities from the NCAA.Ok then how does the NCAA get money to pay their employees.
Why isn’t UGA in if it’s the best 4? Who would they not be favored against on a neutral field?
So it sounds like you agree we didn’t get the best 4 from the committee. Texas was deserving, UGA was better.I thought UGA should've gotten in over Texas. The Big 12 was one of the worst Power 5 conferences. They had to put Texas in since it beat Alabama. Alabama is a much better team now. As I have said, back then I couldn't wait for the Vols to face Milroe. He is a much different quarterback now.
Actually, a university can do more. They can schedule competitive teams; they ca accept the invitation to the best conference in football when it was offered, etc. You know, that sort of thing.Not sure if there’s more of a beef with Bama or Texas, but definite crock that FSU didn’t get a spot. All you can do is play the teams on your schedule.
Maybe I should have just done this from the beginning instead of expecting someone to take my word for it or check it out themselves.Ok then how does the NCAA get money to pay their employees.
Two 1 loss conference champions in over an undefeated conference champion?
Gone are the days of results on the field. 2 years in a row Bama has gotten a bump for the "how they look". It's no longer just about winning but people's opinions truly matter more. The game has become down right pathetic. College Football is a complete joke on all levels.
Obviously I can't speak to their locker room but I think a GA team coming off consecutive championships and having not lost in 29 games not making the playoffs because of a 3pt loss in the CCG to a team now in the playoffs could have them pretty salty. Beating the team (FSU) that believes they belonged in the playoffs even more than you do seems like no small incentive.Don’t be too sure of that. A team that feels disrespected is a very dangerous beast. And I see Georgia being overconfident going in. This has 85 Sugar Bowl vibes written all over it
The problem is that a human committee can’t observe data objectively. I can sympathize. FSU beat Louisville, whose 2 previous losses were to a 4-8 Pitt team and Kentucky. Losing to Texas is going to count a lot more than winning in Death Valley at a time when Clemson was seriously floundering- a team that lost to 7-5 Duke, 7-5 Miami, and a 9-3 NC State.Now that is a great counterpoint. Kudos.
Of course that very much applies to this idea of SOS. Somehow FSU dropped after playing Louisville which tells me there’s zero credibility in the data. The only data that matters in FSU went 13-0 against a solid schedule that included 2 road games against SEC teams while Bama went 12-1, losing their big OOC game at home. Texas at home is probably about the same as going to Death Valley at night this year. FSU won, Bama didn’t. The playoff was supposed to remedy what happened to Auburn in 2004 yet here we are again.
Kirby (who I hate) is too good of a motivator for his team to have a letdown. That doesn’t mean FSU can’t beat them somehow, but it won’t be because UGA isn’t motivated. A lot will depend on opt outs.Don’t be too sure of that. A team that feels disrespected is a very dangerous beast. And I see Georgia being overconfident going in. This has 85 Sugar Bowl vibes written all over it
UGA is going to to curb stomp FSUWell, FSU had the number 55 strength of schedule and Bama had number 5. Bama lost to to a top four team, and beat the top team. FSU did not play anyone close to a Georgia or a Texas. Someone was going to be sad. They chose the crap commuter college that no one follows. Next year we’ll have a playoff with eight teams that don’t have a chance. That will be really boring.
Yep. Of course FSU was down to their 3rd string QB, who wouldn’t have been playing in the bowl game absent another injury, and who knows if they stayed conservative on purpose knowing their D would win that game. They struggled at UF but that was the backup’s first start, in the Swamp at night with an undefeated season and playoff berth in the balance. The backup took on a good Louisville defense with the ACC title, playoff berth and undefeated season on the line. They both did enough to win. The committee projected what they thought would happen by picking Bama but the reality is they have no idea what would happen with FSU’s 2nd string QB starting and a month to prepare. If we went by their emotions they all would’ve picked Oregon over Washington too until UW beat OU a second time.The problem is that a human committee can’t observe data objectively. I can sympathize. FSU beat Louisville, whose 2 previous losses were to a 4-8 Pitt team and Kentucky. Losing to Texas is going to count a lot more than winning in Death Valley at a time when Clemson was seriously floundering- a team that lost to 7-5 Duke, 7-5 Miami, and a 9-3 NC State.
At the same time, I also see FSU’s point. If people had wanted objectivity, they would’ve kept the BCS formula in place for playoff selection, but even then it doesn’t solve the problem because models are only as good as the values of the data emphasized and the weight they are given. There isn’t a foolproof system, but the BCS formula at least had a system. The committee relies on human emotion. In the BCS, if the data favored FSU, then the injury to Travis would be irrelevant as long as they were still ranked in the AP and Coaches poll because the computer effect would balance the human opinion.