First of all, it isn't poor. 6 touchdowns in 110 snaps is not bad. Tennessee scored 35 touchdowns on 804 plays last year. That's 1 TD for every 22 snaps. 6 touchdowns in 110 is one for every 18. So call it poor if you want, but it's 20% better than tennessee had last year. (usu scored 56 in 1,073 plays, or 1 TD for every 19 snaps) edit: it's been pointed out that I'm an idiot for thinking USU can compete with the schedule UT had last year. so if you want to just count games vs unranked FBS teams, thats one in every 21 snaps, instead of 1 in every 22. may God have mercy on my stupid soul. I don't even know how I got through LAWL school with a brain this small.
Second, The first team scored 4 touchdowns on 40-45 snaps. An absolutely exceptional rate.
Third, the second team scored 2 in 65-70 snaps. That's indicative of playing against the number 1s on defense, who allowed 2 touchdowns or fewer in 10 games last year. it's also indicative of having all new WRs and RBs in the game. I'm sure if they scored 8 touchdowns, you'd just be saying how bad the defense was though.
Fourth, it doesn't include FGs, so if you're going off how many points it would be, you're way off.