Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

#3,001
#3,001
luthervol said:
Obviously many thought so, even more thought Trump was a horrible candidate. None of that changes the fact that Comey breaking protocol handed Trump the election.
Click to expand...

If that were true, then why Comey's later actions against Trump? Trump was Hiliary's opponent (the primaries were done - decision made). By your reasoning and Comey's later actions, he would never have written the letter to congress. Simply put, Comey never wanted Trump to win.

My take is that Comey's actions were to clear Hiliary. Implicate her for security violations because she was absolutely guilty ... before you jump on that, join the military and you'll find lack of intention to disclose classified material doesn't matter; it's the fact that somebody did - period. Then before the election he single-handedly played judge and jury and exonerated her ... cleansed her of her sins and made her electable with no lurking, drawn out Mueller-type inquisition. He basically touched her and said "heal; you are cleansed."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and NorthDallas40
#3,005
#3,005
evillawyer said:
Wow, this is huge! Maybe you guys can finally impeach her from whatever position it is that she holds in the forest of Chappaqua
Click to expand...
She should be impeached from having any freedom outside her cell for more than 1 hour/day.


There are military people in prison that did far less un-intentionally than she did intentionally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, AM64 and hjeagle1vol
#3,009
#3,009
evillawyer said:
This tweet thread shows what can be deduced from Trump's dumbass decision to tweet a classified photo

Click to expand...


As I recall, during the reign of obama the great, the president had the ability to declassify at will ... something like because he ran the place and elections have consequences, etc. What's good for the goose ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, hjeagle1vol and SpaceCoastVol
#3,010
#3,010
AM64 said:
As I recall, during the reign of obama the great, the president had the ability to declassify at will ... something like because he ran the place and elections have consequences, etc. What's good for the goose ...
Click to expand...
Yeah but 30 some odd thousand emails from an unsecured server in the Secretary of State's personal residence is A-OK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, FLVOL69 and AM64
#3,011
#3,011
SpaceCoastVol said:
Yeah but 30 some odd thousand emails from an unsecured server in the Secretary of State's personal residence is A-OK.
Click to expand...

The other thing is that I think we all knew our satellites had pretty good resolution, covered a lot of ground, and that we kept tabs on our enemies; so I don't find anything shocking in that photo. Libs of all kinds claim that they divulge classified material for the good of us all ... particularly because they don't want big brother keeping tabs on us or setting policy they don't like. I guess they don't see the irony in that stance and Trump releasing something for the sake of rattling an enemy.
 
#3,012
#3,012
AM64 said:
As I recall, during the reign of obama the great, the president had the ability to declassify at will ... something like because he ran the place and elections have consequences, etc. What's good for the goose ...
Click to expand...

And he did something comparable when?
 
#3,013
#3,013
evillawyer said:
And he did something comparable when?
Click to expand...

You don't think the Osama bin Laden assassination and all the stuff released for obama's victory laps gave away more about how we do things than a single satellite photo that's not so different from many similar photos we've seen? Just imagine what you'd see on Google Earth if the imagery was up to date. If you don't accept that satellites are roaming the skies and keeping tabs of what's below, I can't help you. If you don't see the difference between that and how pinpoint missions using stealth technology, I can't help you. Much of the failed Vietnam Son Tay prison camp raid remained classified for years to protect methods and sources. The methodology for satellites is pretty well understood, and sources wouldn't seem to be a real issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, tennvols77 and FLVOL69
#3,014
#3,014
What is overblown here and what was eluded to in the last tweet I linked is the primary mirror/lens size is apparently fairly well known. Thus for a visible imaging camera as was shown in the picture the diffraction limited resolution is a simple first semester physics algebraic equation to calculate 🤷‍♂️. But that’s not as fun as screeching I know.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#3,015
#3,015
NorthDallas40 said:
What is overblown here and what was eluded to in the last tweet I linked is the primary mirror/lens size is apparently fairly well known to be 2.4M. Thus for a visible imaging camera as was shown in the picture the diffraction limited resolution is a simple first semester physics algebraic equation to calculate 🤷‍♂️. But that’s not as fun as screeching I know.
Click to expand...

I'll take your word for that; I tried to forget entirely the optics I learned in physics. However, I have to admit I'm impressed by a 2.4M lens ... that makes my DSLR lens feel pretty dinky.
 
#3,016
#3,016
AM64 said:
I'll take your word for that; I tried to forget entirely the optics I learned in physics. However, I have to admit I'm impressed by a 2.4M lens ... that makes my DSLR lens feel pretty dinky.
Click to expand...
I don’t know the actual value and I went an edited it back out. Probably not in my best interest and I know you understand what I mean 😬. But that was information I gleaned from web postings that claimed the Keyholes have a larger primary than Hubble which is a 2.4M primary mirror.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#3,023
#3,023
evillawyer said:
Dude was tried to a jury of his peers. They found him not guilty. I know you're a bit cross, but blue balls can do that to a person.

Click to expand...

I actually wasn’t even talking about Craig.

I’m talking specifically about McCabe, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, Page, Ohr, et al.

You defend them blindly only because they ”RESIST” Trump.

It’s ultimately going to be known publicly what they did. You continue to talk blue balls, but the truth is all I’m interested in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#3,024
#3,024
ajvol01 said:
I actually wasn’t even talking about Craig.

I’m talking specifically about McCabe, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, Page, Ohr, et al.

You defend them blindly only because they ”RESIST” Trump.

It’s ultimately going to be known publicly what they did. You continue to talk blue balls, but the truth is all I’m interested in.
Click to expand...

Borrowing this from Bill Shakespeare:

It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
 
#3,025
#3,025
evillawyer said:
Borrowing this from Bill Shakespeare:

It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Click to expand...

I'd never really thought about it before, but that quote pretty much sums up politics as practiced worldwide ... period. Doesn't even matter which side is up or down at the moment.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top