Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

This is going to get interesting. Barr has already seen most of the evidence needed to kneecap our "Trustworthy" ICs. Id be happy if they cleaned out every senior level CIA and busted their corrupt bookcooking for transparency.

I think we have to have an agency like the CIA, and I'm not sure what we'd do without the one we have, but I'm sure having a hard time finding what they've managed to our benefit. They certainly haven't gotten the king-making right ... anywhere at any time from the looks of it. They did probably undermine the Soviets in Afghanistan but couldn't keep us from making the same blunder. The real question is whether the CIA is actually worse or better than appearances ... and what about the myriad of other spy agencies on our books sucking up money? From their past work I can't say I'd be surprised if the CIA were caught stealing Coast Guard drug captures for additional funding, and it's pretty damning when you have that lack of confidence in groups like the CIA and FBI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
I, for one, have been ready for a long time now waiting to see some heads roll from the last corrupt administration which lasted for 8 years. Dims were hoping Hillary would win & to continue their cover-up so that their corruption would not be brought out to the light of day.

Me, too, but I don't think it's going to happen. DC isn't about to let corruption see the sunlight and bring down bureaucracies ... those are lifelong jobs, and they aren't giving them up. You'll have to pry them out of their cold dead hands, and you see what the FBI has done to keep even a potentially unfriendly president from their inner workings. Lower profile people would probably disappear without a trace, or have reputations so smeared they are beyond credibility or rehabilitation. Reeducation camps for dissenters would probably be in order if they could manage the perception.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
Let's address the elephant in the room. Why would he admit that?

The tweet is from 12/21/19 and links to a video, the tweeter says he “did it again.” It gave the impression the video is recent, as in happened in the last few days or weeks and is at least the second time he’s made that statement.

Is that wrong?
 
The tweet is from 12/21/19 and links to a video, the tweeter says he “did it again.” It gave the impression the video is recent, as in happened in the last few days or weeks and is at least the second time he’s made that statement.

Is that wrong?
wrong, dumb, whatever

Why deflect from the original question?

Why does Obama keep saying this?

Why after all the birthers were labeled conspiracy nuts do the media and libs ignore/dismiss it?
 
The tweet is from 12/21/19 and links to a video, the tweeter says he “did it again.” It gave the impression the video is recent, as in happened in the last few days or weeks and is at least the second time he’s made that statement.

Is that wrong?
Whether it was once or twice. Let me ask again. Why would he admit this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
wrong, dumb, whatever

Why deflect from the original question?

Why does Obama keep saying this?

Why after all the birthers were labeled conspiracy nuts do the media and libs ignore/dismiss it?

My question was the original question. People keep trying not answer and then skip ahead in line.
 
last year?
The cspan unedited video of Senate debate 2004 with keyes contains the phrase " that's ok, I'm not running for president, I'm running for the Senate" in response to Alan keyes statement "you are not even a natural born citizen." The unedited version and transcript are now unavailable and WLS7 out of Chicago is not responding to any requests for it.
2 videos pre presidential election are no longer available in my bookmarks. The YouTube owner has disappeared off YouTube.
So i can't offer those up.
 
The cspan unedited video of Senate debate 2004 with keyes contains the phrase " that's ok, I'm not running for president, I'm running for the Senate" in response to Alan keyes statement "you are not even a natural born citizen." The unedited version and transcript are now unavailable and WLS7 out of Chicago is not responding to any requests for it.
2 videos pre presidential election are no longer available in my bookmarks. The YouTube owner has disappeared off YouTube.
So i can't offer those up.
And then again this week?
 
The cspan unedited video of Senate debate 2004 with keyes contains the phrase " that's ok, I'm not running for president, I'm running for the Senate" in response to Alan keyes statement "you are not even a natural born citizen." The unedited version and transcript are now unavailable and WLS7 out of Chicago is not responding to any requests for it.
2 videos pre presidential election are no longer available in my bookmarks. The YouTube owner has disappeared off YouTube.
So i can't offer those up.

Was this it?

 
I find this interesting. Every liberal in my family is on zoloft... Because they can't cope.
I had a doctor from Jordan tell me they should put xanax in the water here, i laughed. Most of my liberal colleagues are on mood enhancers. I just find this to be true for the most part.
They always have lack of emotional intelligence and logic
 
No, the validity of that tape is in question with me. It seems edited and the statements are made when i can't see his face or mouth moving with his back to camera.

Yea I looked at it several times. Some words and motions fit but not all necessarily. Looked like it was a video clip recorded on a TV screen. Just thought it might of been the CSPAN as there is an image on the corner and cannot tell.
 
They always have lack of emotional intelligence and logic
This post in the middle of this thread is priceless.

As long as we're providing anecdotal evidence: none of my liberal friends, relatives, or co-workers are medicated. A number of my conservative right wing friends, relatives, and co-workers are.
 

VN Store



Back
Top