Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

#4,926
#4,926
37L1 said:
Read it chronologically:

Definition of chronological
: of, relating to, or arranged in or according to the order of time


#4908 NurseGoodVol "Norfolk"

#4909 W.TN.Orange Blood

#4910 luthervol "Where do you live?"
Click to expand...
Now I see where you are confused.
I read and responded to 4903.
4903 comes before 4908 which is why I read and responded to it before I ever saw 4908. You see now.
My response being #4910 is just a reflection of when I read and responded to 4903
 
#4,927
#4,927
luthervol said:
Now I see where you are confused.
I read and responded to 4903.
4903 comes before 4908 which is why I read and responded to it before I ever saw 4908. You see now.
My response being #4910 is just a reflection of when I read and responded to 4903
Click to expand...
So you say I'm confused and that you read things in "chronological order", neither appear to be true.



The kick was made after the touchdown so it's a PAT.
 
Last edited:
#4,930
#4,930
37L1 said:
Read it chronologically:

Definition of chronological
: of, relating to, or arranged in or according to the order of time


#4908 NurseGoodVol "Norfolk"

#4909 W.TN.Orange Blood

#4910 luthervol "Where do you live?"
Click to expand...
Give Luther a break here.

He obviously replied to 4908 4903 before reading 4909

I do it all the time
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,931
#4,931
37L1 said:
So you say I'm confused and that you read things in "chronological order", neither appear to be true.
Click to expand...
I'm starting to think you're joking.
See if you grasp this:
I read and responded to 4903 before I read 4904.
I read 4904 after I read and responded to 4903 but before I read 4905.
I read 4905 after reading 4904 but before reading 4906.
Seeing the pattern?
It's called chronological order.
If you follow the pattern you will deduce that I read 4908 after I read 4907 but before I read 4909, all of which happened after I had read and responded to 4903 (it coming earlier in chronological order and all)
My response being assigned a post number of 4910 means nothing other than there had been 6 responses from the time 4903 was originally posted and the time I read and responded to it.
 
#4,932
#4,932
luthervol said:
I'm starting to think you're joking.
See if you grasp this:
I read and responded to 4903 before I read 4904.
I read 4904 after I read and responded to 4903 but before I read 4905.
I read 4905 after reading 4904 but before reading 4906.
Seeing the pattern?
It's called chronological order.
If you follow the pattern you will deduce that I read 4908 after I read 4907 but before I read 4909, all of which happened after I had read and responded to 4903 (it coming earlier in chronological order and all)
My response being assigned a post number of 4910 means nothing other than there had been 6 responses from the time 4903 was originally posted and the time I read and responded to it.
Click to expand...
Hey luther, buddy, I always got what you were saying, that you were responding to her earlier post as linked but anyone else reading the thread "chronologically" would see that it didn't appear that way as the answer was given before you asked the question in your preceding post response. So I had to, just had to, bust your balls after your comment of "always" reading threads chronologically. Kind of like your "rouge" misspelling. We all knew what you meant, even if that wasn't what you wrote.

Sorry for going all RockyTop on ya. :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,933
#4,933
37L1 said:
Hey luther, buddy, I always got what you were saying, that you were responding to her earlier post as linked but anyone else reading the thread "chronologically" would see that it didn't appear that way as the answer was given before you asked the question in your preceding post response. So I had to, just had to, bust your balls after your comment of "always" reading threads chronologically. Kind of like your "rouge" misspelling. We all knew what you meant, even if that wasn't what you wrote.

Sorry for going all RockyTop on ya. :cool:
Click to expand...
No problems. It made me enjoy the double shot of Jack more.
You got me on the idiotic spelling of rogue, but you missed on the "chronologically" shot.
50%, not bad from 3 point range but sucks on PAT's
 
#4,934
#4,934
luthervol said:
No problems. It made me enjoy the double shot of Jack more.
You got me on the idiotic spelling of rogue, but you missed on the "chronologically" shot.
50%, not bad from 3 point range but sucks on PAT's
Click to expand...
Did I miss? Nope.

iu
 
#4,938
#4,938
That area is famous for fog. Light traffic at the time. I've driven in that area multiple times, people like to do 90 when they can't see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,939
#4,939
NurseGoodVol said:
Norfolk, with 64. I'm sure it's nothing like trying to go around Atlanta but my first thought when i moved here was " why does everyone have dents in their cars?"
Click to expand...
We've always lived close to where we work and tried to make avoiding traffic an art form, but still sometimes it's unavoidable.

I don't care where you live, if it takes 45 minutes to go 8 miles, it sux.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Orangeburst
#4,940
#4,940
luthervol said:
We've always lived close to where we work and tried to make avoiding traffic an art form, but still sometimes it's unavoidable.

I don't care where you live, if it takes 45 minutes to go 8 miles, it sux.
Click to expand...

I worked the Atlanta area last year and it is the worst I have been in. Other than 285 there are no loops. Lived in Houston for years and it was easier as the roads were much better with their hubs and spokes design and frontage roads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,942
#4,942
luthervol said:
We've always lived close to where we work and tried to make avoiding traffic an art form, but still sometimes it's unavoidable.

I don't care where you live, if it takes 45 minutes to go 8 miles, it sux.
Click to expand...
Me too, after working where i leave at 545 and don't get home until 845 the next morning, i made not driving an art form. I'll have to move if Im to master that again.
 
#4,947
#4,947
Orange_Vol1321 said:


View attachment 248435
Click to expand...


The real question is who initiated the FBI investigation and why. Most places of business don't allow employees to go rogue and initiate projects. It would seem that criminal matters should be referred to the FBI and are at least initiated by a demonstrable crime - not one because someone has a hunch kind of moment. Are we paying taxes so that people inside the FBI can dream up make work projects?
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40, Orange_Vol1321 and davethevol
#4,948
#4,948
AM64 said:
The real question is who initiated the FBI investigation and why. Most places of business don't allow employees to go rogue and initiate projects. It would seem that criminal matters should be referred to the FBI and are at least initiated by a demonstrable crime - not one because someone has a hunch kind of moment. Are we paying taxes so that people inside the FBI can dream up make work projects?
Click to expand...
His last name possibly starts with an O.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, hjeagle1vol, ajvol01 and 4 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top