Conservative Hypocrisy on Trump Taking Secret Documents

#1

WBO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2019
Messages
1,709
Likes
2,791
#1
Conservatives are such hypocrites. In 2016 all we heard was "Lock Her Up" over Clinton's private file server, the gist of the argument being that she had endangered national security. Now we find Trump had 15 boxes of Top Secret documents that he illegally took to Florida.

Not a word about it from Fox, OAN or any of the self-styled "patriots" that post on here.

Pure hypocrisy.

You guys are jokes.
 
#2
#2
Conservatives are such hypocrites. In 2016 all we heard was "Lock Her Up" over Clinton's private file server, the gist of the argument being that she had endangered national security. Now we find Trump had 15 boxes of Top Secret documents that he illegally took to Florida.

Not a word about it from Fox, OAN or any of the self-styled "patriots" that post on here.

Pure hypocrisy.

You guys are jokes.

Speaking about Hillary & how such a crook as she is it's really not reported on enough....

BOMBSHELL: Clinton Campaign Lawyers Paid Tech Company to Infiltrate Trump White House Servers
 
#8
#8
Conservatives are such hypocrites. In 2016 all we heard was "Lock Her Up" over Clinton's private file server, the gist of the argument being that she had endangered national security. Now we find Trump had 15 boxes of Top Secret documents that he illegally took to Florida.

Not a word about it from Fox, OAN or any of the self-styled "patriots" that post on here.

Pure hypocrisy.

You guys are jokes.
Hacking government servers is a WHOLE different level of corruption my friend. Wanna guess how many decades you or I would spend in the deepest cell of Federal prison if we did that? Nay, if we even ACCESSED said servers, much less hack them?
 
#9
#9
Hacking government servers is a WHOLE different level of corruption my friend. Wanna guess how many decades you or I would spend in the deepest cell of Federal prison if we did that? Nay, if we even ACCESSED said servers, much less hack them?

"Hacking."

In this context I don't think it means what you think it means.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#18
#18
I mean, I'd at least like to read up on what he allegedly did before making sure he got the death penalty.
Well two links are offered above but I donā€™t think the OP finds them useful to his baby powder infused chapped ass screeching.
 
#19
#19
1) Trump and Hillary should both be in jail
2) For this PARTICULAR alleged incident of wrongdoing how about you provide a link to a reputable legal scholar that says this is a crime. Cite the corresponding code for me too. For all you know him taking those documents may be covered by privilege. And since you appear to be a blathering lunatic, let me clarify that I mean executive privilege not the White kind.
 
#22
#22
I mean, I'd at least like to read up on what he allegedly did before making sure he got the death penalty.
From what I can gather so far, the new allegations are that the Clinton campaign paid a tech company to use their existing access to servers used by the Trump campaign and later at the Trump Whitehouse to ā€žmineā€œ DNS lookup data. DNS lookups are occasions in which a computer looks up IP addresses for urls. So for example, when you type ā€œVolnation.comā€ into your browser, a series of queries are made to special servers around the world to find the actual latest current IP address for that domain. The tech company in question had access to the list of dns lookup activities on Trumpā€™s server. The company took Clinton money to provide the campaign with what was basically a record of every contact attempt made by those servers.
For an equivalent, imagine I worked for a cellular phone company and someone slipped me money under the table to tell them every phone call you made and every website you accessed for the pst year. Without a valid warrant, phone companies just canā€™t do that.
Now what makes this even more egregious is that this improper use and disclosure of sensitive data didnā€™t occur on an everyday cell phone, it allegedly occurred on severs used by the most powerful office on the planet. The Chinese or Russians would pay $$$$$$ for that kind of snooping data. But in this case, the snooping was done by the nominee of the rival opposition political party.
The comparisons to Watergate are not off the mark. If true, this is bad bad stuff. It is the equivalent of placing a bug in the Oval Office and it wasnā€™t done at the request of law enforcement, it was done by a political opponent.
 
#24
#24
Conservatives are such hypocrites. In 2016 all we heard was "Lock Her Up" over Clinton's private file server, the gist of the argument being that she had endangered national security. Now we find Trump had 15 boxes of Top Secret documents that he illegally took to Florida.

Not a word about it from Fox, OAN or any of the self-styled "patriots" that post on here.

Pure hypocrisy.

You guys are jokes.
Did you get this info from CNN , MSNBC, or another media outlet that has paid out millions recently for slander ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary

VN Store



Back
Top