Court Orders Dissolution of Trump Org

#280
#280
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
Donald Trump is facing a civil trial in New York for "fraud." So, which of his victims is suing him? That's a trick question: There aren't any.

None of New York's banks or insurance companies, Trump's supposed "victims," are suing him. Trump's loans are repaid and his accounts are current. Because one judge says Trump "overvalued" his properties, that same judge is empowered to fine him hundreds of millions of dollars, break up the Trump Organization, and seize control of his properties, including Trump Tower, all to remedy a phantom crime with no victims.

When this happens in China or Russia, we call it what it is: Lawfare against an enemy of the regime.

Normal people do not yet realize how patently insane this is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, NEO, BigOrangeTrain and 2 others
#281
#281
jmacvols1 said:
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
Donald Trump is facing a civil trial in New York for "fraud." So, which of his victims is suing him? That's a trick question: There aren't any.

None of New York's banks or insurance companies, Trump's supposed "victims," are suing him. Trump's loans are repaid and his accounts are current. Because one judge says Trump "overvalued" his properties, that same judge is empowered to fine him hundreds of millions of dollars, break up the Trump Organization, and seize control of his properties, including Trump Tower, all to remedy a phantom crime with no victims.

When this happens in China or Russia, we call it what it is: Lawfare against an enemy of the regime.

Normal people do not yet realize how patently insane this is.
Click to expand...

It's been pointed out repeatedly why he's being held accountable for knowingly receiving personal financial gain based on false "statements of financial condition." Charlies Kirk is playing on the low IQ of his readers to not think critically of why the State holds financial fraudsters accountable.

www.newyorker.com

Breaking Down New York’s Long-Awaited Fraud Lawsuit Against Donald Trump

Letitia James, the New York attorney general, claims that the Trump Organization illegally obtained hundreds of millions of dollars by systematically exaggerating the value of its properties.
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com
 
#282
#282
Septic said:
It's been pointed out repeatedly why he's being held accountable for knowingly receiving personal financial gain based on false "statements of financial condition." Charlies Kirk is playing on the low IQ of his readers to not think critically of why the State holds financial fraudsters accountable.

www.newyorker.com

Breaking Down New York’s Long-Awaited Fraud Lawsuit Against Donald Trump

Letitia James, the New York attorney general, claims that the Trump Organization illegally obtained hundreds of millions of dollars by systematically exaggerating the value of its properties.
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com
Click to expand...
It's another nothing-burger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#284
#284
jmacvols1 said:
Click to expand...


Well there you have it. See, the judge is being impartial in the application of the law - this must be a great relief to the MAGA crowd.

If nothing else, he can spin that into being 80% innocent of fraud.
 
#286
#286
Septic said:
Well there you have it. See, the judge is being impartial in the application of the law - this must be a great relief to the MAGA crowd.

If nothing else, he can spin that into being 80% innocent of fraud.
Click to expand...
As pointed out already, there is no valid case for there is no fraud, no victims of any fraud perpetrated by Trump. Legal deals were made, loans paid back.....banks happy, Trump happy but corrupt Dem judge unhappy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and Orangeburst
#290
#290
lawgator1 said:
Yeah but above post was that Trump was bragging about a ruling.
Click to expand...
I didn't see Trump bragging about it but pointing out that a crooked judge was trying to charge him with legitimate deals that passed the statute of limitation.
 
#291
#291
jmacvols1 said:
I didn't see Trump bragging about it but pointing out that a crooked judge was trying to charge him with legitimate deals that passed the statute of limitation.
Click to expand...

Your reading comprehension is poor.

Trump is bragging about the ruling ... from a judge he claims is corrupted. Makes no sense.
 
#296
#296
lawgator1 said:
Make it personal, right? Feed that narrative to distract from the facts.

Trump will get his chance to appeal. In the meantime, if you care about the objective facts and not basing your perception of the facts on whether you think the prosecutor likes or dislikes Trump, personally, you will be far better off.
Click to expand...
Just like the objective facts about Russia collusion and the dossier that you and many others stated that beyond a shadow of a doubt proved the collusion narrative? You and your party are clowns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmacvols1
#297
#297
lawgator1 said:
Your reading comprehension is poor.

Trump is bragging about the ruling ... from a judge he claims is corrupted. Makes no sense.
Click to expand...
Funny and hypocritical. Liberal mouth breathers can stammer on about Supreme Court justices like Kavanaugh and Barret being corrupt. But that’s cool because it’s libs right?
 
#300
#300
jmacvols1 said:
I didn't see Trump bragging about it but pointing out that a crooked judge was trying to charge him with legitimate deals that passed the statute of limitation.
Click to expand...
That seems like the profoundly uninformed take of someone who hasn't even watched the intro to Law & Order.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top