Critical race theory and elections

Joe Biden Appoints Critical Race Theory Activist to Department of Education amid Crackdown on Parents

McKesson2-e1633585284653-640x480.jpg


President Joe Biden has appointed Precious McKesson, a Nebraska Democrat, racial radical, and Critical Race Theory activist, to the position of Special Assistant in the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Communications and Outreach.

Chair of the Nebraska Democrat Black Caucus and former Finance Director for the statewide party, McKesson recently embedded herself in the Critical Race Theory issue when she and some of her colleagues from the Nebraska Democrat Party’s Latinx [sic], black, and Native caucuses wrote an August 11 op-ed for the Lincoln Journal Star to oppose a measure to ban Critical Race Theory from being taught at the University of Nebraska.
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2021/10/McKesson3.jpg
Biden Appoints Critical Race Theory Activist to Education Department Post
 
WaPo: Republicans Guilty of ‘Grade A Demagoguery’ for Siding with ‘Angry Mob’ of Anti-CRT Parents

Republicans are guilty of “grade A demagoguery” for exploiting a new Department of Justice (DOJ) memorandum combating alleged threats from “the angry mob” of vocal parents who’ve spoken out against the teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in schools, in order to vilify the Biden administration and regain power, according to Washington Post columnist Paul Waldman.

WaPo: GOP Siding with Anti-CRT ‘Angry Mob’ Is ‘Grade A Demagoguery’
 
Joe Biden Appoints Critical Race Theory Activist to Department of Education amid Crackdown on Parents

McKesson2-e1633585284653-640x480.jpg


President Joe Biden has appointed Precious McKesson, a Nebraska Democrat, racial radical, and Critical Race Theory activist, to the position of Special Assistant in the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Communications and Outreach.

Chair of the Nebraska Democrat Black Caucus and former Finance Director for the statewide party, McKesson recently embedded herself in the Critical Race Theory issue when she and some of her colleagues from the Nebraska Democrat Party’s Latinx [sic], black, and Native caucuses wrote an August 11 op-ed for the Lincoln Journal Star to oppose a measure to ban Critical Race Theory from being taught at the University of Nebraska.
Biden Appoints Critical Race Theory Activist to Education Department Post

Now this is why we have a major problem. Look at that title:

Special Assistant in the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Communications and Outreach. #SAUSDoEOoCaO
 
Joe Biden Appoints Critical Race Theory Activist to Department of Education amid Crackdown on Parents

McKesson2-e1633585284653-640x480.jpg


President Joe Biden has appointed Precious McKesson, a Nebraska Democrat, racial radical, and Critical Race Theory activist, to the position of Special Assistant in the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Communications and Outreach.

Chair of the Nebraska Democrat Black Caucus and former Finance Director for the statewide party, McKesson recently embedded herself in the Critical Race Theory issue when she and some of her colleagues from the Nebraska Democrat Party’s Latinx [sic], black, and Native caucuses wrote an August 11 op-ed for the Lincoln Journal Star to oppose a measure to ban Critical Race Theory from being taught at the University of Nebraska.
Biden Appoints Critical Race Theory Activist to Education Department Post

The supply of fat, angry, ugly, loud black women is endless.
 
Without vigilance, our children are instead exposed to teaching like this.
View attachment 390026

We must acknowledge that our forbearers made mistakes, point to the ways our ancestors made up for those mistakes, and demonstrate that what has already been done satisfies the scales of justice. Should be easy enough.

Why is a 3rd-grade Canadian textbook that was recalled being held out as the summary education of a U.S. student? What is age-appropriate; do we go full-on 'Roots' in elementary school? Who leaves the U.S. education system without a basic understanding that wars of conquest and slavery are wrong, and that the U.S. partook in both the practice and abolition of it?

If anything, it may be that the cultural universality of conquest and slavery have been PeopleOfColor-washed as things white people did to pigmented people, instead of the ubiquitous conditions of every people and race on earth. In fact, it should be pointed out that Western societies were the eventual agent of change in stamping out global slavery. As someone remarked, for millennia, slavery had no defenders because there were no critics.

So it IS acknowledged, on beating a dead horse-level, but should never be "acknowledged" in the one-sided, racialist manner that Marxists in blackface wish it to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and AM64
Joe Biden Appoints Critical Race Theory Activist to Department of Education amid Crackdown on Parents

McKesson2-e1633585284653-640x480.jpg


President Joe Biden has appointed Precious McKesson, a Nebraska Democrat, racial radical, and Critical Race Theory activist, to the position of Special Assistant in the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Communications and Outreach.

Chair of the Nebraska Democrat Black Caucus and former Finance Director for the statewide party, McKesson recently embedded herself in the Critical Race Theory issue when she and some of her colleagues from the Nebraska Democrat Party’s Latinx [sic], black, and Native caucuses wrote an August 11 op-ed for the Lincoln Journal Star to oppose a measure to ban Critical Race Theory from being taught at the University of Nebraska.
Biden Appoints Critical Race Theory Activist to Education Department Post

The Biden Administration loves to double down on stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
A Curriculum of Irrelevancy

Another ridiculous Zoom meeting with a school leader on the precipice of deciding no more classroom libraries because "some of the books might make kids question what their parents want them to know" has encouraged me to think that a Bloody Mary, made with tomato juice remember, is an important part of the food pyramid and I should partake right now. And doesn't vodka come from potatoes?

It has also made me so sad. We are so quickly moving down the path of sustaining a curriculum that is focused on the irrelevant ("Show three ways the author created tension in this short story."), as it guards white fragility and continues to deny a history that is a critical part in the country we are today.

Here is the conversation. All knew I was recording it. I promised not to mention school names, district names, size of district, or anything else thing else that could suggest a particular identity if I wrote about the conversation.

Principal: Dr. Beers, thank you for joining us. We've been asked to take a deep look at the books our high school social studies and ELA teachers have in their classrooms to make sure they present more than a single side of an issue. We had a concern raised by one parent because of a book her ninth grade daughter chose to read. This book was in her ELA classroom in a section marked "Autobiographies." Mrs. X, thank you for joining our call. Would you like to tell Dr. Beers what happened?

Mrs. X: Yes. Thank you. My ninth grade daughter is very sweet, very smart, actually an above-level reader. Her teacher has books in her classroom the students can choose to read. My daughter loves autobiographies and so she chose this book called Warriors Don't Cry. Do you know the book?

I told her I did. I refrained from saying that I met Melba Beals, the author, before I actually read Warriors Don't Cry and I sobbed while reading it. I'm no warrior. I didn't tell her I thought this autobiography of one of the Little Rock Nine to integrate their previously all white high school, should be required reading. I just said, "I have read it. Several times." She raised her eyebrows and went on.

Mrs X: Well, I didn't know she was reading it until one evening she read a part aloud to me and she was crying. She was crying! She said it made her sad to see what white people did to Black people and she wanted to know why white people were so mean and is that why when George Floyd got killed Black people were so angry. She said "it was like nothing had changed." The mother paused then went on: It was obvious that this book was making her feel bad for being white. No book should make a child feel bad for being white. Or, I guess, any other race. We didn't even discuss that George Floyd incident. It wasn't about us, so we didn't see any reason to discuss it. And here she was, thinking about it.

Principal: So, we have some new regulations here in [our state] that encourage having books that present the other side of a controversial issue in libraries, especially classroom libraries. We'd like your opinion on that.

At this point, I was wondering why I had agreed to be a part of this conversation, but I took a breath and began. "I think it is very simple. You have to define controversial. There is nothing controversial about what happened to Melba Beals and those other eight Black students. There is nothing to be controverted with her account - we know that because her account is documented by too many confirming stories and the white students who were the most consistently cruel to her have stepped forward, as adults, and recognized their abuse. There is no "good side" to the horrific year in her life and the abuses by many white people during this time of ending segregation in the South. If you want an example of a controversial subject that should show various positions, I suppose there is some controversy over whether people should eat a plant-based diet rather than a meat-based diet. In a health class I'd like to see students read about that issue from multiple doctors including heart specialists, environmentalists, farmers and ranchers, and nutritionists. But this book, this issue, these facts - I think you are asking the wrong question.

Principal: What's the right question?

Me: Mrs. X, what's your real concern?

Mrs. X: My daughter. She was upset. Books at school shouldn't upset anyone and certainly should not upset a young person just because she is white.

Me: Sounds to me as if your daughter has a huge heart.

Mrs. X: Well, yes. She does. Thank you.

Me: It's hard when our children begin to learn certain truths, isn't it? I bet your daughter cried a lot when she learned about Santa Claus.

Mrs. X (smiing): She did. And she said we could not tell her little [sibling] because she wanted that belief to continue.

Me: Yes. Sometimes we want some beliefs to continue. We don't want to know the truth. And sometimes the truth, when we learn it makes us cry. This is a far harder truth than Santa, isn't it. Learning this country's history is hard. I'm proud of her for feeling what Melba Beals was sharing. Have you started reading the book, Mrs. X? (She shakes her head no.) I think when you do - and I think you should - you will be proud of your daughter for crying and you will thank the teacher for having this book the classroom. Think of it this way: From your description, it sounds like she is smart enough to ask some really tough questions. Perhaps questions she hasn't considered before or things that haven't been discussed at home and maybe you aren't ready to discuss those issues. I don't blame you, they are hard ones.

Mrs. X (defensive): That's right. We don't sit around discussing how white people are bad. That's what you are suggesting, right? All white people are racist. Well, we don't believe that and I don't like my child, she's just in ninth grade, wondering that.

Me: Again, I'm deeply impressed with the questions your daughter was asking. I wonder if she'd be interested in reading more about racism and discovering what others have to say about systemic racism in the country. You know, Mrs. X, having compassion for what someone else experienced and trying to see how patterns of behavior have continued is important if we want those patterns to be interrupted. And this isn't about what I think or don't think. It is about the wonderful daughter you have who is thinking. You wouldn't want to discourage that.

Mrs. X: No, of course not. But she just doesn't need to be thinking about that. My word, that was in the previous century. My daughter is not a racist. I am not a racist. And I don't think we need our students reading things that make them feel bad for being who they are.

Me: Yes. I think a lot of people would agree. You know, for the longest time, no children's books had divorced parents in them. None. I wonder if the kids who sat in classrooms with divorced parents felt left out, unseen? I wonder if they felt bad. And for a long time, no books, or almost no books, featured children or teens who were any color other than white. I wonder how those kids felt? And for a long time, in books and on TV, the Indiginous People of this nation were portrayed as savages or simple minded or alcoholics. I wonder how those children felt. Books ought to make us feel something, and sometimes that feeling is regret; other times it is horror; others times it is courage; other times it is relief at finding someone who looks like we look. Your daughter found one of those books - a book that showed her someone, at her grade, living a very different ninth grade year, a horrific ninth grade year. And that hurt her heart. And that led to her questioning if we're treating one other justly now. And that's a great thing. I think you should be proud of her and should be thanking the teacher.

Mrs. X didn't say thank you, but she didn't say I was wrong. She said that she wasn't sure she had made her point exactly right but did see what I was saying. She said she would "certainly" be reading the book. I honestly don't know if that will make things better or not.

And then she left Zoom. And the principal said to me that this is happening almost daily now. "I don't know. Maybe the only way we can get covered what we need to teach for [our state] test is to take out books like this. I just don't know." I liked this principal. He was conflicted and willing to sit in that for a moment before rushing to a bad decision.

So, I'm mailing him a copy of Forged by Reading, which he has promised to read. I've sticky-noted the section I've pasted below which begins on page 30 of the book. I want him to seriously consider what happens when we begin removing books from shelves. What do we remove next? Who - or what - do we become?

From Forged by Reading (Beers and Probst)

Sailing into tomorrow may require us to rethink assumptions
and values so that we act differently in the future. There will
be implications and consequences for considering the new and
reconsidering what we have long thought. The only way to avoid the discomfort is to avoid the issues. If we can avoid talking about and reading about problematic matters, issues that might require us to rethink values and assumptions, then we won’t feel the discomfort that such difficult thought might entail.

If we banish from our minds, our libraries, and our classrooms any examination of politics, religion, race, environment, sex, justice, and the like, we might protect ourselves from the possible discomfort we might experience. All we have to do is trivialize the curriculum to the point that few will be bothered by anything.

If we can make instruction completely insignificant, utterly irrelevant to anyone’s emotional and intellectual life, then absolutely no one should rise up to protest the threat we pose to treasured beliefs, valued affiliations, or well-established habits of thought and action. We can teach kids how viruses are different from bacteria but avoid discussing why the health care system better serves the wealthy than the poor. We can teach what events led up to World War II and which countries fought on which sides and the horrors of the Nazi concentration camps but fail to mention our own concentration camps for American citizens of Japanese ancestry or consider why the 761st Tank Battalion or the 555th Parachute Battalion consisted solely of African American soldiers. We can give the facts of Brown v. Board of Education but never read what happened to the Little Rock Nine, never discuss how the integration of schools caused thousands of well-qualified Black teachers to lose their jobs because white parents refused to let their children be taught by a Black teacher.

We can teach the definitions of “preposition” and “conjunction.”
That will raise few hackles. “Onomatopoeia” and “zeugma” are
unlikely to drive marchers into the streets, even if we require
students to learn both definition and spelling. Better yet, we
can teach penmanship—that will threaten the values of neither
the conservatives nor the progressives, neither Republicans nor
Democrats, neither those drilling for oil nor the sailors on one of the Greenpeace ships.

Total irrelevancy, absolute insignificance, and unwavering stasis are effective strategies for avoiding the discomfort of thought and change.

***

We cannot, dear teachers, ever give in to the demands of irrelevancy. So, Mr. Principal, you must be brave. You must steer the ship into tomorrow. Your teachers will be there with you. And students, they may shudder at past injustices - long past and recent past - and I hope they do. If they don't, we are in more trouble than I thought.

I wish you all bravery. Stamina. And the knowledge that your hard work is the good work; the best work; the needed work. We need you.

Kylene Beers
 
District Denies Teaching CRT, Then Hosts CRT Advocate Gloria Ladson-Billings

Leadership at Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS) directed principals to deny that critical race theory is taught in the district, then hosted a racial equity training for teachers featuring known critical race theorist Gloria Ladson-Billings, according to an email obtained by the Daily Caller.

Michelle Jackson, the executive director of teaching and learning at IPS, and Nathalie Henderson, the chief schools officer, sent a joint email on August 24 to principals in the district, instructing them to deny that critical race theory (CRT) is being taught. Principals were instructed to direct parent questions about CRT to Henderson and IPS Chief of Staff Andrew Strope, the email said.

The email contained a document that instructed principals on how to respond to questions about CRT and racial equity training. Principals were told they should tell parents the district uses “culturally relevant material,” a phrase that is synonymous with the teachings of CRT.

District Denies Teaching CRT, Then Hosts CRT Advocate Gloria Ladson-Billings
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
Former Head of National Social Studies Org Urged Teachers to Reward Student Activism for BLM, LGBTQ, Illegal Immigration

GettyImages-1169850862-640x410.jpg


The former president of the nation’s largest association devoted to social studies education set the stage two years ago for America’s K-12 social studies teachers to educate students in the tenets of Critical Race Theory (CRT) and reward those who engaged in leftist activism for Black Lives Matter, LGBTQ rights, and illegal immigration advocacy.

In an address titled “Agency, Advocacy, Activism: Action for Social Studies,” and delivered at the National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) 2019 conference, former NCSS president Tina Lane Heafner told her audience, “The ecology of social studies is changing in an era of activist voters.”

“We must recognize the critical role that social studies educators need to embrace in humanizing the curriculum, educating for empathy and action, and empowering children and youth agency, advocacy and activism,” Heafner stated, as reported Thursday by Newsweek’s Lee Habeeb, who contrasted Heafner’s message with a story about his father, a high school history and social studies teacher and, ultimately, his school district’s superintendent.

Former Head of National Social Studies Org Urged Leftist Student Activism
 
Former Head of National Social Studies Org Urged Teachers to Reward Student Activism for BLM, LGBTQ, Illegal Immigration

GettyImages-1169850862-640x410.jpg


The former president of the nation’s largest association devoted to social studies education set the stage two years ago for America’s K-12 social studies teachers to educate students in the tenets of Critical Race Theory (CRT) and reward those who engaged in leftist activism for Black Lives Matter, LGBTQ rights, and illegal immigration advocacy.

In an address titled “Agency, Advocacy, Activism: Action for Social Studies,” and delivered at the National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) 2019 conference, former NCSS president Tina Lane Heafner told her audience, “The ecology of social studies is changing in an era of activist voters.”

“We must recognize the critical role that social studies educators need to embrace in humanizing the curriculum, educating for empathy and action, and empowering children and youth agency, advocacy and activism,” Heafner stated, as reported Thursday by Newsweek’s Lee Habeeb, who contrasted Heafner’s message with a story about his father, a high school history and social studies teacher and, ultimately, his school district’s superintendent.

Former Head of National Social Studies Org Urged Leftist Student Activism

They seem so angry for people advocating tolerance and understanding.
 
Good grief. Can we please just thoroughly teach history again with all its highest highs and lowest lows stripped bare and open to lively and honest conversations.

Let’s add in each student from class bringing in a current event of interest, reading it in class and explaining why you found it interesting then opening the floor for discussions on it.
 
For those of you who are interested, here are the Tennessee Social Studies / History standards by grade. It's easy to follow and includes which items are required to be taught by law.
https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/education/standards/ss/Social_Studies_Standards.pdf

Thank you, that information is very much appreciated. I’ve saved it as a reference as I can clearly see that my 4th grade grandchild is either not being well taught or not retaining the taught information during conversations we have. My daughter and I are in serious discussions about converting to homeschooling in the very near future so I can take over this child’s education at a targeted pace that fosters better comprehension and retention in essential subjects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
But does the TN SSS pdf really tell us what is being taught? Firmly, 'No'. Parents must be aware of the actual curricula & how it is presented in classrooms by the teachers assigned to their children in order to evaluate; even the curricula itself is not enough to inform whether your child is being educated objectively, or abused ideologically. ‘I Plan To Ignore It’: Tennessee Teachers Criticize Critical Race Theory Ban At Public Schools, Say It Will Harm Students

Critical theory - a Marxian theory that society is composed of a dominant group which victimizes and subjugates another/others to remain in a dominant position is the basis; oppressors and oppressed. It begat Critical Legal Theory (or Studies), which begat Critical Race (or Racial) Theory in the latter third of the last century. Critical Theory was brought to the U.S. by German and Italian dissidents of fascist regimes earlier in the century, 'intellectuals' from the University of Frankfurt’s Institute for Social Research in the 1930s with intellectual technocrats Herbert Marcuse, Max Horkheimer, and Teodor Adorno, and others. To not be discovered as Marxists, they adapted the dogma by relabeling it Critical Theory, but it's simply new paint on the same old Marxian jalopy, just as 'Democratic Socialism' attempts to rebrand today.

The broad prosperity experienced by Western societies in the 20th century - and it's horrific implementation in the USSR, China, etc. - cut the legs from under Marxism as a 'worker's movement' in the West. With the steam taken out of broad Marxian appeal, Horkheimer wondered how to advance the cause. Marcuse pondered that a victim coalition of blacks, women and homosexuals could be molded into a new vanguard. These ideas found fodder in feminism and the civil rights era, and took root in college campuses across the nation. The vast majority of teachers come from and are accredited by that collegiate arena, which has devolved from a place of 'logos' - the ability to think; reason - to authoritarian group-think in which the technocrat and intellectual propose a different society, and opposing view is 'hate speech' to be forcibly suppressed. And it is that tool of vilification and coercion which blesses the 'educated' disciple and excoriates the nonsubscriber as misogynist, racist, bigot - and those are the good things said about dissenters - that has matured into the social chaos of today, and is the express goal.

Marxism MUST separate parent from child, groups from co-existence, equity from equality, and reason from base, identity balkanization. It is incompatible, in entirety, with a constitutional republic, and is oil to the water of individual liberty. This is an American variant of Marxism, and the leaders of this movement see this as their moment in time, a culminating opportunity to use "the most progressive president (and administration) ever" and make deep changes that when set in motion will be difficult or impossible to root out. These are the Great Resetters, an American president who needs his face wiped after ice cream encounters, proposing to fundamentally change the economy and world. A global, collaborative tax scheme to actually disadvantage this nation and corrode competitive ingenuity is just the "aw, shucks...'fairness" neutering of what they term a white supremacist society.

The tip of the spear is using smattering partial truth to inflict wounds which become septic from the pathogenic lies coating it. Yes, I doubt there are many, if any, K-12 courses titled 'Critical Race Theory', but just as the American Marxist immigrants veiled their doctrine under CT, CRT is veiled under K-12 terms such as social justice, equity, various 'whiteness' dogma, racism, trans/queer tolerance and is presented in both part and parcel with the 1619 Project, BLM At School, and literature under the guise of sex and health education.

I don't blame anyone necessarily, for being ignorant of the graduating efforts to indoctrinate children with anti-American, anti-Western, anti-capitalist propaganda because of the partial truths it has been cloaked in. But it is inexcusable to remain ignorant of the existential threat by enemies, primarily domestic, at this juncture and not reassert control over the educational indoctrination complex and our governments facilitating it. OTOH, why listen to a schmuck like me instead of this guy:

"Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted." V. Lenin
Start digging, folks.
 
Last edited:
But does the TN SSS pdf really tell us what is being taught? Firmly, 'No'. Parents must be aware of the actual curricula & how it is presented in classrooms by the teachers assigned to their children in order to evaluate; even the curricula itself is not enough to inform whether your child is being educated objectively, or abused ideologically. ‘I Plan To Ignore It’: Tennessee Teachers Criticize Critical Race Theory Ban At Public Schools, Say It Will Harm Students

Critical theory - a Marxian theory that society is composed of a dominant group which victimizes and subjugates another/others to remain in a dominant position is the basis; oppressors and oppressed. It begat Critical Legal Theory (or Studies), which begat Critical Race (or Racial) Theory in the latter third of the last century. Critical Theory was brought to the U.S. by German and Italian dissidents of fascist regimes earlier in the century, 'intellectuals' from the University of Frankfurt’s Institute for Social Research in the 1930s with intellectual technocrats Herbert Marcuse, Max Horkheimer, and Teodor Adorno, and others. To not be discovered as Marxists, they adapted the dogma by relabeling it Critical Theory, but it's simply new paint on the same old Marxian jalopy, just as 'Democratic Socialism' attempts to rebrand today.

The broad prosperity experienced by Western societies in the 20th century - and it's horrific implementation in the USSR, China, etc. - cut the legs from under Marxism as a 'worker's movement' in the West. With the steam taken out of broad Marxian appeal, Horkheimer wondered how to advance the cause. Marcuse pondered that a victim coalition of blacks, women and homosexuals could be molded into a new vanguard. These ideas found fodder in feminism and the civil rights era, and took root in college campuses across the nation. The vast majority of teachers come from and are accredited by that collegiate arena, which has devolved from a place of 'logos' - the ability to think; reason - to authoritarian group-think in which the technocrat and intellectual propose a different society, and opposing view is 'hate speech' to be forcibly suppressed. And it is that tool of vilification and coercion which blesses the 'educated' disciple and excoriates the nonsubscriber as misogynist, racist, bigot - and those are the good things said about dissenters - that has matured into the social chaos of today, and is the express goal.

Marxism MUST separate parent from child, groups from co-existence, equity from equality, and reason from base, identity balkanization. It is incompatible, in entirety, with a constitutional republic, and is oil to the water of individual liberty. This is an American variant of Marxism, and the leaders of this movement see this as their moment in time, a culminating opportunity to use "the most progressive president (and administration) ever" and make deep changes that when set in motion will be difficult or impossible to root out. These are the Great Resetters, an American president who needs his face wiped after ice cream encounters, proposing to fundamentally change the economy and world. A global, collaborative tax scheme to actually disadvantage this nation and corrode competitive ingenuity is just the "aw, shucks...'fairness" neutering of what they term a white supremacist society.

The tip of the spear is using smattering partial truth to inflict wounds which become septic from the pathogenic lies coating it. Yes, I doubt there are many, if any, K-12 courses titled 'Critical Race Theory', but just as the American Marxist immigrants veiled their doctrine under CRT, CRT is veiled under K-12 terms such as social justice, equity, various 'whiteness' dogma, racism, trans/queer tolerance and is presented in both part and parcel with the 1619 Project, BLM At School, and literature under the guise of sex and health education.

I don't blame anyone necessarily, for being ignorant of the graduating efforts to indoctrinate children with anti-American, anti-Western, anti-capitalist propaganda because of the partial truths it has been cloaked in. But it is inexcusable to remain ignorant of the existential threat by enemies, primarily domestic, at this juncture and not reassert control over the educational indoctrination complex and our governments facilitating it. OTOH, why listen to a schmuck like me instead of this guy:

"Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted." V. Lenin
Start digging, folks.

When was the last time you asked a teacher or principal for the copy of a unit plan?
 

VN Store



Back
Top