We have been over this before. I do respect that you hold the coached to the same standards. All who didn't like him aren't racist. I don't think you are. Your feelings and actions don't speak for all though.
Some praised and still praise Tyndall who was worse in everysingle way. How do you explain the differnce in how they were treated? Martin had more exciting, higher scoring teams who won more with the same type of rosters and expectations.
You also can't say that its not a factor in him leaving. His wife received death threats and they didn't feel safe. It was a factor. There is a reason writers bring it up. It happened.
There is maybe two to three people that still like Tyndall.....just like there are two or more people that still champion C Martin......I don't like either one and I don't like Pearl any more bc he coaches the enemy....I am a Rick Barnes fan right now although I am in wait and see mode with him.
As for the media, controversy sells....just like the crazy white kid that shot up the black church.....Every story was about the confederate flag and very little attention was given to the thousands of white and black people standing hand in hand praying for the families of the tragedy. We need stories that bring all of us together instead.
When that petition came out, Martin had missed the NCAAT every single year of his coaching career so far and it appeared that 2014 was going to be no different. TN was something like 15-10 (6-6) when the signature count was exploding.
Tyndall was well liked as he was overachieving through the first half of the SEC schedule. His support steadily declined as the loses piled up on the back end of the conference schedule.
Martin overacheived his years going by preseason expectations. 15-10 with a great probability to still make it with a team that was not even ranked preseason is no reason to to turn on a coach. People seem to forget we were not rankedand had new pgs. We did about what was expected. Then we improved as the year went along and finished with one of UTs greatest seasons. A few early losses don't minimize the great year it ended up being.
Tyndall got way more suppor t than earned. Even after the horrible year people said they hope he can be retained and was better than Martin. He got the benefit of the doubt and every excuse possible for his garbage coaching. Martin didn't get credit for surpassing expectations.
Martin overacheived his years going by preseason expectations. 15-10 with a great probability to still make it with a team that was not even ranked preseason is no reason to to turn on a coach. People seem to forget we were not rankedand had new pgs. We did about what was expected. Then we improved as the year went along and finished with one of UTs greatest seasons. A few early losses don't minimize the great year it ended up being.
Tyndall got way more suppor t than earned. Even after the horrible year people said they hope he can be retained and was better than Martin. He got the benefit of the doubt and every excuse possible for his garbage coaching. Martin didn't get credit for surpassing expectations.
Martin overacheived his years going by preseason expectations. 15-10 with a great probability to still make it with a team that was not even ranked preseason is no reason to to turn on a coach. People seem to forget we were not rankedand had new pgs. We did about what was expected. Then we improved as the year went along and finished with one of UTs greatest seasons. A few early losses don't minimize the great year it ended up being.
Tyndall got way more suppor t than earned. Even after the horrible year people said they hope he can be retained and was better than Martin. He got the benefit of the doubt and every excuse possible for his garbage coaching. Martin didn't get credit for surpassing expectations.
Go read the first year Zo was here....it was filled with Im so glad he is our coach talk.....year two was when it started going down hill with year three getting worse than the year before.
Go read the first year Zo was here....it was filled with Im so glad he is our coach talk.....year two was when it started going down hill with year three getting worse than the year before.
Year three. JM was never 100% and new pgs. Not ranked preseason. Won 20 games regular season and ended with the second or third best season in UT history.
All this is true. All I see is criticism though.
2013-14 was not a great year. Winning an NCAAT play in game and then beating two mid-majors was not an amazing result. Especially with three players from that team eventually cashing NBA pay checks.
Cuonzo had a revised contract with a raise and an extension sitting on his desk and an opportunity to prove that he was a good coach in his 4th year. He ran away from it. He knew that he was going to fail in 2014-15.
So if you are putting restrictions on who we best in the tourney etc, I guess Pearl had one good year. The other years he either finished below preseason ranking or beat lame teams in the tourney.
So if you are putting restrictions on who we best in the tourney etc, I guess Pearl had one good year. The other years he either finished below preseason ranking or beat lame teams in the tourney.
I've got to side with you on this one KTK. Winning in the tournament is winning in the tournament.
That's why it is so important to make it every year. You never know when you'll get a good draw. If you keep going, you'll make your runs.
Good teams lose early every year and mediocre teams make runs.
The 13-14 team caught a favorable draw but that's just part of it.
McRae was never 100%?? First I've heard of that excuse.
New point guards? Whose fault is that? "We don't need a point guard in my system" - Cuonzo Martin
Not ranked preseason? I can't help but think that the head coach has something to do with that. The talent was there. 3 players drafted off that roster.
It was not the 2nd or 3rd best season in UT history.
Cuonzo lost 41 games in three years and was going to lose another 15-20 in his 4th year. Stop being a revisionist... he did very little until the petition was started and then he ran away instead of coming back and proving that he was a good coach. He was not ready to win in the SEC. He might have eventually been a good coach at TN, but going into his 4th year the program was heading down, not up.
All I see is whining about no tourneys.
No one ever brings up they were picked last and next to last his first year. Then he almost made the tourney with an inexperienced team. People act like it was a failure when he double what was expected.
No one brings up how the next year We were not ranked and were projected to be a bubble team with Maymon. JM was our best player then. He missed the whole year. We still were a bubble team and the experts thought we were snubbed. We didnt have Our bestplayer the whole year. Still almost made it.
Year three. Stil
I've got to side with you on this one KTK. Winning in the tournament is winning in the tournament.
That's why it is so important to make it every year. You never know when you'll get a good draw. If you keep going, you'll make your runs.
Good teams lose early every year and mediocre teams make runs.
The 13-14 team caught a favorable draw but that's just part of it.
19-15 and a quick exit from the NIT, 10-6 and tying two others for 2nd in the SEC, one and done in the SECT, losing to Oakland, Austin Peay, and Charleston was not surpassing expectations "by a mile".
When you are picked at the bottom of the conference it is. What did you think of Tyndall's performance? Since his year was way worse than any of Martin's you must think he is the worst ever. I could have sworn you were one of the guys that kept making excuses for him though.
When you are picked at the bottom of the conference it is. What did you think of Tyndall's performance? Since his year was way worse than any of Martin's you must think he is the worst ever. I could have sworn you were one of the guys that kept making excuses for him though.