orange_glory
The Tennessee shade of Orange
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 4,477
- Likes
- 3,884
It can't be denied how important was Maymon was for Stokes last year. We're seeing those troubles of playing without him this year. He's still averaging 11 points and 8 rebounds as an 18 year old, which are actually slightly better numbers than last season. We're seeing the classic 5 star backlash I suppose. I'll agree, he is hurting us at times and needs to put forth more effort out there.
I don't think people are over reacting. IMO this team is regressing....half time adjustment are lacking, FT shoot is terrible this year, and this offense is on the same level as Kevin O'Neil. I think when we drop out of the top 10 (top 5 last few years) in national attendance, the administration will have to take a hard look.
We lucked out that Pearl was able to resurrect our program. The least they can ask for is the current HC to keep it going. Yes, football is the economic driver of the athletic budget, but when mens and women's bball are doing well they are self sustaining. I guess the point I'm making is pick your poison with Martin. The way I see it is you get rid of him if we are in the same boat next year and deal with the pay out OR your athletic dept will feel the pressure to support a sinking bball program as ticket sales and concessions drop when the fans stay at home due to the product on the floor.
Do I want Martin to succeed, Yes. Will I continue to purchase season tickets to both bball and football, Yes. I'm just tired of watching once proud programs struggle.
Sorry for the rant.
There is so much more Stokes needs to improve than having another post with him.
It can't be denied how important was Maymon was for Stokes last year. We're seeing those troubles of playing without him this year. He's still averaging 11 points and 8 rebounds as an 18 year old, which are actually slightly better numbers than last season. We're seeing the classic 5 star backlash I suppose. I'll agree, he is hurting us at times and needs to put forth more effort out there.
He has no offensive skill set. 90% of his points are garbage points off rebounds, which I give him credit for. But he isn't the post player you can depend on to score. He misses tons of lay ups, gets the ball stripped or blocked a ton, and makes a bunch of bad spin moves that gets him in trouble that usually results in a TO or bad shot.
I see you've given up already. You made a poor comparison, accept it and move on.
Welcome aboard. Nice first post.I don't think people are over reacting. IMO this team is regressing....half time adjustment are lacking, FT shoot is terrible this year, and this offense is on the same level as Kevin O'Neil. I think when we drop out of the top 10 (top 5 last few years) in national attendance, the administration will have to take a hard look.
We lucked out that Pearl was able to resurrect our program. The least they can ask for is the current HC to keep it going. Yes, football is the economic driver of the athletic budget, but when mens and women's bball are doing well they are self sustaining. I guess the point I'm making is pick your poison with Martin. The way I see it is you get rid of him if we are in the same boat next year and deal with the pay out OR your athletic dept will feel the pressure to support a sinking bball program as ticket sales and concessions drop when the fans stay at home due to the product on the floor.
Do I want Martin to succeed, Yes. Will I continue to purchase season tickets to both bball and football, Yes. I'm just tired of watching once proud programs struggle.
Sorry for the rant.
Given up? Never. However, I am second guessing purchasing season tix for the first time in about 10 years. Probably wont get them next year. Much easier to get them for the big games and not purchase the entire year to watch the garbage I have had to watch this season.