hatvol96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 49,979
- Likes
- 18
This is pretty funny. So.....if we run behind the one great offensive lineman we have we should be able to get good yardage....right? I mean as long as he is actually really good. Nevermind that he can only block one person and the defense has a DL in the gap on one side of him, a DE on the gap on the other side of him, and a LB lined up right in between them??? So, if Sears was actually good (which of course he is not, he only got SEC OL of the week last week, must be horrible) we could run right behind him and despite the fact that there are 3 accountable defenders in his area we should get good yardage? Good suggestion Vince Lombardi.
I think he came back to Tennessee, to #1 put a resurgance in the O, #2 set himself up for the Head job if Phil fails.
I wonder why Alabama has never wanted him. Anyone know if they have ever talked???[/quote]
Because he coached at Tennessee and under Phillip Fulmer. I would have a better chance of coaching at bama than Cutcliffe.
This is your arguement:
When UT rushes for negative yards against Florida, its not because Sears isn't a good player, its because the rest of the Oline isn't very good.
But when UT rushes the ball successfully against Marshall, its because Sears is a good player.
So whenever UT rushes the ball well its because of Sears, and whenever UT struggles to rush the ball its not because of Sears its the rest of the Oline's fault?
So Sears can make a difference in a game against Marshall and can't make any difference in a game against Florida?
Did it ever occur to you, that when UT struggles to rush the ball its because their best offensive lineman isn't playing well and when they can its because he is?
Micahel Munoz made All American teams. Both he and his teammates were average at best.
If you would do your homework, you'd see Munoz made an All-American team as a senior. That's what made his going undrafted even more hilarious. As to Rerun Sears, exactly what great rushing numbers have we put up the last two years?He made the Frosh AA team and if you recall oh great knowledgeable one, his frosh year he played very well. Also I would disagree about the talent around him. And I did not say that a player had to have fellow AA all around him. Just a solid corp. If you look at our rushing yards you of all people would have to agree. I mean we have had only plow horses since Jam left. Right? So if those plow horses got the yards they did then you would have to agree that Sears does not have a solid corp around him. Maybe Sears will get arrested then you can like him.
Munoz made the Coaches and AP All American teams in '04. Maybe if you had the foresight to consult a media guide before you start your cluefree ramblings you would be able to avoid the embarassment of looking so silly. Some of us around here have the mental capacity to work from memory. You and your cohorts in Bizarro MENSA don't.He made the Frosh AA team and if you recall oh great knowledgeable one, his frosh year he played very well. Also I would disagree about the talent around him. And I did not say that a player had to have fellow AA all around him. Just a solid corp. If you look at our rushing yards you of all people would have to agree. I mean we have had only plow horses since Jam left. Right? So if those plow horses got the yards they did then you would have to agree that Sears does not have a solid corp around him. Maybe Sears will get arrested then you can like him.
If you would do your homework, you'd see Munoz made an All-American team as a senior. That's what made his going undrafted even more hilarious. As to Rerun Sears, exactly what great rushing numbers have we put up the last two years?
Page 112, genius. Reading shoudn't be that difficult.In the media guide I have it doesn't mention him as an AA his SR year. I know there are a ton of AA litst out there but only a couple that carry weight. And I disagree with you about him having a solid corp around him. Most would as well.
I didn't say great #'s but we have been a good running team. This year not so much. The fact is yet again you bash our players. What a surprise. Like I said, maybe he'll get arrested so you can like him.
Where did I say the guys who played with Munoz were "solid?" I believe my exact words were "average at best." I don't think that's a synonymous with "solid."In the media guide I have it doesn't mention him as an AA his SR year (or I don't remember it anyway I'll check when I get home). I know there are a ton of AA litst out there but only a couple that carry weight. And I disagree with you about him having a solid corp around him. Most would as well. To say he didn't have a solid corp around him is foolish.
I didn't say great #'s but we have been a good running team. This year not so much. The fact is yet again you bash our players. What a surprise. Like I said, maybe he'll get arrested so you can like him.
The point I'm making is that we don't have any good linemen. Just a bunch of Jenny Craig posterboys.
When Sears is handing you your supersized fries in three years, remind me how good he is.We have Sears and he is a good lineman. We have Josh Mcneil Frosh center and has the tools to be very good. But Center is one of the toughest positions to play. Our line is underachieving but that doesn't mean Sears is not good.
Where did I say the guys who played with Munoz were "solid?" I believe my exact words were "average at best." I don't think that's a synonymous with "solid."
You're the one in need of remedial help. Read your own Post #92 in this thread. You disagree with my assessment that Munoz' s teammates were solid. That's troubling. I never said they were solid.Learn to read. I said they were solid. Not great but solid. We ran well and gave our young QB's time to play. I would call that solid. Not great not even in the top ten of all lines. But solid.