Cutcliffe's job

#101
#101
hatvol96 said:
You're the one in need of remedial help. Read your own Post #92 in this thread. You disagree with my assessment that Munoz' s teammates were solid. That's troubling. I never said they were solid.
Click to expand...
Whats up hatevol. Who are you picking on today. Ha! Ha!
 
#102
#102
hatvol96 said:
You're the one in need of remedial help. Read your own Post #92 in this thread. You disagree with my assessment that Munoz' s teammates were solid. That's troubling. I never said they were solid.
Click to expand...


When I stated that I disagree with you about MM having a solid corp around him I meant that I thought he DID have one. Are you up with me now or do I need to type s l o w e r ?
 
#103
#103
Hey hate, have a good night. I gotta go and won't have net access for a while. So think of some other VOLS you can bash on and I'll pick up sometime tomorrow.
 
#104
#104
VolBeef88 said:
When I stated that I disagree with you about MM having a solid corp around him I meant that I thought he DID have one. Are you up with me now or do I need to type s l o w e r ?
Click to expand...
No, you need to write more clearly than an intoxicated fifth grader.
 
#105
#105
VolBeef88 said:
Hey hate, have a good night. I gotta go and won't have net access for a while. So think of some other VOLS you can bash on and I'll pick up sometime tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Many McDonald's now have web access. You should take your computer with you. That is, if the nice lady at the public library will let you borrow it.
 
#106
#106
hatvol96 said:
When Sears is handing you your supersized fries in three years, remind me how good he is.
Click to expand...


Are you out of your mind? If he slides past the third round it would be a shock. He already has a solid rep built (preseason all-sec, best lineman on a top-25 team) along with good size and four years of experience.

I see why they call you hatevol.
 
#107
#107
TravisHenryCBlockedMe said:
Are you out of your mind? If he slides past the third round it would be a shock. He already has a solid rep built (preseason all-sec, best lineman on a top-25 team) along with good size and four years of experience.

I see why they call you hatevol.
Click to expand...
Says the man who celebrates Gary Coleman/Webster/Rodney Allen Rippey in his board name. Tony Mandarich was the #2 pick in the entire draft. How long did he last in the league? The only professional sport Rerun might excel in would be competitive eating. Then again, Kobyashi has more heart and toughness than he does.
 
#108
#108
TravisHenryCBlockedMe said:
Are you out of your mind? If he slides past the third round it would be a shock. He already has a solid rep built (preseason all-sec, best lineman on a top-25 team) along with good size and four years of experience.

I see why they call you hatevol.
Click to expand...
Michael Munoz played four years and was a First Team All American his senior year. Who's he playing for now?
 
#109
#109
therickbol said:
Your reasoning is absurd, just admit it.
Click to expand...

First you take the almost indefensible position that there is no relationship between UT's lack of success running the ball and Sears play.

Then to defend your weak argument you mention how good Sears was against Marshall when he was SEC OL of the week:

therickbol said:
So, if Sears was actually good (which of course he is not, he only got SEC OL of the week last week, must be horrible)
Click to expand...

Then when confronted with your faulty reasoning, you deny you ever mentioned his play against Marshall.

therickbol said:
Can you point out to me where any of my posts said that the reason we ran the ball better against Marshall was just because of Sears?
Click to expand...

Then you accuse me of absurd reasoning? It appears you don't even remember you own posts.
 
#110
#110
i think it's pretty obvious the O line is not very good, we lack talent and depth across the line...debating whether or not Aaron Sears is any good or not is kind of pointless. He is best O Linemen we have on the team, but that ain't saying much this year. But i do think it takes more than one serviceable O linemen to make the whole thing work.

just my 2cents on the matter....

Oh, and Munoz was way overrated. David Pollack made him look silly when he was lined up against him.
 
#112
#112
oklavol said:
thats what I was trying to say. He is no all-american.
Click to expand...
yeah, i kind of figured.

I am a believer though good players make other good players great. Sears may very well be a good O lineman, and he might play on Sundays (who knows?), but just looking at his performances, which haven't been awful, they sure haven't been noteworthy, except the Marshall game, which is nice, good for him, but i can't get super excited about that.

It would be different if we were a dominant force on the line that we could run behind with no problems. that's not the case. His side of the line doesn't get any more push than the other side.

and opponents have enough tape now, that shows you can get push with out stacking the line....that in and of itself should worry us all concerning the O line...

it's not like we're seeing 8 and 9 man fronts. 7 guys on most occaisions.

bottom line is we are getting 0 help from the other 4 guys on the line, the FB's are't taking out LB's, and we're not effective in the running game.

Is that necessarily Sears' fault all by himslef? no. but is he also some "diamond in the rough" that we can say has made a huge difference in the running game? no also.

Good game against Marshall. Do it again against Quinten Moses and the GA D line, and i'll put him back on ALL SEC and AA lists. and that goes for the rest of the O line as well. Good player. Not a great, dominant player.
 
#113
#113
jakez4ut said:
...but just looking at his performances, which haven't been awful, they sure haven't been noteworthy, except the Marshall game, which is nice, good for him, but i can't get super excited about that...Good game against Marshall. Do it again against Quinten Moses and the GA D line, and i'll put him back on ALL SEC and AA lists. and that goes for the rest of the O line as well. Good player. Not a great, dominant player.
Click to expand...

I would disagree. After looking at the FL game some, from what I saw, he more than held his own in that game. The rest of the OL folded around him. I'd say he's the best OL we've had since Fred Weary. He's even this good despite some terrible coaching through his 4 years. Reminds me of Peerless and Dante. They were good despite the coaching of PW.
 
#114
#114
Liper said:
I would disagree. After looking at the FL game some, from what I saw, he more than held his own in that game. The rest of the OL folded around him. I'd say he's the best OL we've had since Fred Weary. He's even this good despite some terrible coaching through his 4 years. Reminds me of Peerless and Dante. They were good despite the coaching of PW.
Click to expand...
that may be true, but the point of the whole thing is that even if he is that good, you'd never know it by the way we have been unable to run the ball period.

I think he could be much better if he had any talent around him. it's hard to show a lot of praise for a one man show in a unit that needs to be graded as a group.
 
#115
#115
VolBeef88 said:
When I stated that I disagree with you about MM having a solid corp around him I meant that I thought he DID have one. Are you up with me now or do I need to type s l o w e r ?
Click to expand...

No offense intended, but some of your previous posts in support of Sears were worded a little awkwardly. If you were trying to get that published, an editor would definitely be making some revisions. I'm not trying to critique your sentence structure, I can just see how some of those posts could easily be misinterpreted.
 
#116
#116
oklavol said:
First you take the almost indefensible position that there is no relationship between UT's lack of success running the ball and Sears play.

Then to defend your weak argument you mention how good Sears was against Marshall when he was SEC OL of the week:



Then when confronted with your faulty reasoning, you deny you ever mentioned his play against Marshall.



Then you accuse me of absurd reasoning? It appears you don't even remember you own posts.
Click to expand...

Do you understand the english language or is it not your primary language? I said Sears was named SEC OL of the Week for his play against Marshall. That statement was followed by a period meaning it is the end of the statement. And, that thought was finished. Nowhere in that statement did I say UT RAN THE BALL BETTER BECAUSE OF SEARS. We ran the ball for more yardage in the Marshall game because Coker had two big runs, a 20+ yarder and an 89 yarder. All that does is make my point even better. Sears did his part on the 89 yard run, but his part was just a small part of a whole. The reason Coker could bust that run was a.) because he is very fast and b.) because the ENTIRE OL (TE included) made good blocks on that run. We had the entire DL pinned inside and opened a huge cutback lane to the outside. Could Sears be better? Yes. Is the best OL in college football? No. But, your argument that deciding whether or not he is good based not being able to run right behind him every play and get 5 yards is ascinine. Take Sears out, leave the other 4 UT OL in, and put Orlando Pace in Sears spot. Run the ball right behind Orlando Pace and expect him to block 3 people and if he cant then he is not any good?
 
#117
#117
therickbol said:
Do you understand the english language or is it not your primary language? ...... But, your argument that deciding whether or not he is good based not being able to run right behind him every play and get 5 yards is ascinine.
Click to expand...

I tried to be nice, but its impossible to discuss anything with you because you can't defend your opinion without insulting anyone.

Nowhere did I say you should be able to run for 5 yds behind Sears every play. What I did say, you should be able to get a couple of yards occasionaly instead of ending up with minus yds for a game, particularly if he is an all-american.

But it doesn't matter what I say, because your gonna twist it into some position that I never took so you can attack it. Well attack another post, because I won't bother to respond to anything else.
 
#118
#118
Liper said:
I would disagree. After looking at the FL game some, from what I saw, he more than held his own in that game. The rest of the OL folded around him. I'd say he's the best OL we've had since Fred Weary. He's even this good despite some terrible coaching through his 4 years. Reminds me of Peerless and Dante. They were good despite the coaching of PW.
Click to expand...

Considering UT was able to move the ball with the passing game, that should have made it a lot easier to run. Safeties and linebackers weren't able to focus solely on the running game like last year. I think the Oline is worse then people want to believe.

I can't remember UT having negative yards rushing in a game before. Its been a long time. I think this Oline is the worst UT has had under Fulmer. The RB's have some talent. But this Oline and FB are not very effective.
 
#119
#119
oklavol said:
I tried to be nice, but its impossible to discuss anything with you because you can't defend your opinion without insulting anyone.

Nowhere did I say you should be able to run for 5 yds behind Sears every play. What I did say, you should be able to get a couple of yards occasionaly instead of ending up with minus yds for a game, particularly if he is an all-american.

But it doesn't matter what I say, because your gonna twist it into some position that I never took so you can attack it. Well attack another post, because I won't bother to respond to anything else.
Click to expand...

You accuse me of putting words in your mouth? Ha, thats funny. Anway, I do agree that the OL play and especially the FB play this year is the worst I have ever seen at UT. I never had any glowing remarks for our OL. My only contention is that its ridiculous to say that not one of our offensive lineman can be any good because as a team we had -11 yards. That falls on the entire OL, and there is nothing one member of the line can do to fix that. That is my argument. Is he an All-American, no. But is he probably one of the best OL in the SEC, yes. He just cant do it by himself.
 
#120
#120
hatvol96 said:
Many McDonald's now have web access. You should take your computer with you. That is, if the nice lady at the public library will let you borrow it.
Click to expand...


I thought I was on your ignore list? Well I guess my musings are a little to tempting.
 
#121
#121
VolBeef88 said:
I thought I was on your ignore list? Well I guess my musings are a little to tempting.
Click to expand...
I did put you on for a short time. Then I realized that I actually do enjoy our little sparring sessions. Also, I realized who that would group you with. Even you don't deserve that.
 
#122
#122
Why am I on your ignore list?:dunno:

Do you not want to own up on the tickets.......?:question:

Yes I am just being silly!:eek:k:
 
#123
#123
OrangeEmpire said:
Why am I on your ignore list?:dunno:

Do you not want to own up on the tickets.......?:question:

Yes I am just being silly!:eek:k:
Click to expand...
That reminds me, when do you want those tickets sent to you? I'll pick them up either when I'm in town for Alabama or LSU.
 
#124
#124
If you really want to get us tickets, I will more than happily take your graciousness. Just PM whenever and I will give you my address.......however safe that might be.

:hi: :victory: :worship: :shaking2:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top