DACA must be reinstated

#101
#101
n_huffhines said:
The judicial branch interprets the law. What this judge says is the law until he gets overturned. Regardless of what judicial precedent is, or what congress did, this ruling is the law. When the next level of the judicial system reviews this, they will take into account what precedent is, and what congress's part may have been, and overturn but until then, this is the law. I'm surprised this has to be explained to you.
Click to expand...

Aren’t all executive orders supposed to be constitutional?
 
#104
#104
C-south said:
How can ONE judge overturn an executive order? When was the last time an executive order has been overturned by a single judge?
Click to expand...
I guess the Republicans should have looked for a friendly judge and overturned everything that The One did to the country. Could have overturned ZeroCare as soon as it was passed as being unconstitutional. Could have done away with a lot of misery.
 
#105
#105
SpaceCoastVol said:
I guess the Republicans should have looked for a friendly judge and overturned everything that The One did to the country. Could have overturned ZeroCare as soon as it was passed as being unconstitutional. Could have done away with a lot of misery.
Click to expand...

John Roberts Participated in writing the ACA and he was supposedly a right winger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
#106
#106
Sandman 423 said:
Aren’t all executive orders supposed to be constitutional?
Click to expand...

Are you asking if all XO's are constitutional or if they are supposed to adhere to the constitution? If it's the former, no...an obvious example would be an XO that re-institutes slavery would be unconstitutional. If the latter, yeah.
 
#108
#108
I'm actually going to agree with the majority here. There has been plenty of time and opportunity for those in the country at the time DACA was implemented to apply. We have to draw a line somewhere.
 
#109
#109
AshG said:
I'm actually going to agree with the majority here. There has been plenty of time and opportunity for those in the country at the time DACA was implemented to apply. We have to draw a line somewhere.
Click to expand...
Any child whom was raised here and knows no other country shouldn’t be deported hell this is the only country they know. That is punitive and punishing them for the sins of their parents.

However DACA never fixed this it’s just an EO to not enforce the law. DACA needs to be vacated and Congress needs to do their damn job and fix it. But f$&@ the parents they came as adults throw their asses out and make them get in line like everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
#112
#112
Huh. This almost reads like freaking common sense. Go figure.

The judge found that the agency's interpretation of statutes was "overly broad" and those laws did not carry the authority for the federal government to institute the program.

"DACA would grant lawful presence and work authorization to over a million people for whom Congress had made no provision and has consistently refused to make such a provision," Hanen wrote.

Republicans have repeatedly claimed that the program was illegal, and President Donald Trump sought to revoke the program. That effort was shot down by the Supreme Court, which found it was done in a manner that was "arbitrary and capricious," while not ruling on the program itself.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top