What? Please explain your logic.
It's a flawed stat imo.
Few scenarios:
If a pitcher goes out and goes 8 IP, and only gives up one run and has 9 K's, he has a great game going. In the 8th he starts getting a bit shaky, but get's through the inning. Manager decides to leave him in, he walks a batter, gives up a base hit, and then gives up a bomb, even though the mgr should have taken him out. He no longer gets a quality start, even though you can argue he had a quality start.
Vise versa, a pitcher can pitch 6 innings, give up 3 earned runs, and have 5 walks. As stated before, that's an era of 4.5 and a ton of walks. I personally wouldn't call that a quality start, imo.
In 2011, Ryan Dempster has 21 quality starts. That would make him top 15 in the league, only 5 behind the league leader in quality starts that year, Matt Cain. Yet he post a 10-14 record and a 4.80 era. 21 quality starts with that stat line? No way.
Also, you have to take into account if they pitch in a pitcher's park or a hitter's park, and then we must to consider the defense behind them.
Now, more often than not, I will agree that a "quality start" on the stat sheet is a good job on the mound that day. But, imo, it is a flawed statistic. I guess that was the point I was trying to make
:hi: