dsbyrd
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2007
- Messages
- 1,629
- Likes
- 13
it's not remotely reasonable. Fixed pricing is absolutely counter to capitalism and is simply socialism under a nicer name.Maybe somebody else has said this before, but that is the first reasonable statement about HC I have read on this board. It's amazing that neither candidate ever gave anything more than lip service to this idea. They just talked about handout's in some form or other.
but if we have a free market system that contradicts obama's ideal that the federal government should provide all. obama's socialism is appalling.
what else does "affordable for all mean?"Posted via VolNation Mobile
You're so clueless it's pitiful. From your own article (which also agrees to Obama's detailed tax plan). Please feel free to ask detailed questions on what this means because your previous posts on this subject show that you have NO idea what you're talking about. I'd LOVE to hear your explanation of how this plan would result in a 40% tax rate for an estate worth $12,000.
Obama proposes freezing the estate tax at 2009 levels: a 45% tax rate on estates valued at more than $3.5 million. Married couples can combine their exemptions for a total of $7 million.
"By exempting all estates under $7 million, Obama's plan will shield all but about 100 estates with small business income from any estate taxation," said Obama campaign spokesman Nick Shapiro, citing the Congressional Budget Office's 2005 study on the estate tax and further analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "Senator Obama's plan would completely exempt 99.7% of estates from taxation."
you missed the edit, and the reading comprehension from the post of which you decry
You don't think the market can achieve this?
EDIT:
I see what you are getting at. Minus the freeloaders, the market can create a system where premiums are affordable for the majority of Americans that could afford it that currently can't. There are currently hard working americans that aren't freeloaders that simply can't afford it right now. The point is that the system set up now is imperfect.
Let's see. You posted this:
..."if you lose a close family member who gives you more than $12,000, then you pay 40% in taxes under obama... this is not a question."
Then another poster said that they would happily pay a 40% tax on an inheritance of more than $12,000. Then you basically responded that you were shocked that the other poster wouldn't be outraged that his $12,000 inheritance would be taxed at 40%.
No estate under $3.5 million ($7.0 million per couple) would be taxed under the estate tax. You're $12,000 inheritance would be totally tax free. As long as you agree to that fact, then we're in perfect agreement.
seriously junior, learn some reading comprehension
there have always been hard working Americans who couldn't afford it and there are always going to be.
Our imperfect system provides them with care anyway and that's amazing. The 40 million uninsured is just vote gathering blather. They don't have formal coverage, but they can get care by walking in a hospital.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
If the "more than $12,000" phrase highlighted is your contention with my posts, then you're a bigger idiot than I first thought.
$3.5 million per individual ($7.0 million per couple) is exempt from the estate tax. Every dollar left to you in an estate from dollar number 1 to dollar number $3.5 million ($7.0 million for a couple) is TAX EXEMPT.
If the "more than $12,000" phrase highlighted is your contention with my posts, then you're a bigger idiot than I first thought.
$3.5 million per individual ($7.0 million per couple) is exempt from the estate tax. Every dollar left to you in an estate from dollar number 1 to dollar number $3.5 million ($7.0 million for a couple) is TAX EXEMPT.