That's the way your type rolls. You don't argue something on merit. You judge an act against some legal point dug up in prior court decisions. This one is simple. Trump was "voted" out of office; he's not president; you can't remove him; game's up; you lost ... again. The fact that Trump is even being impeached at this point seems dangerously close to "ex post facto" law since impeachment has never before been retroactively retroactively applied against a president no longer in office. In other words, your side is making it up on the fly, and you'll probably find as usual that expediency like karma is a bitch.
Republicans are tough on terrorists until the terrorists are Republicans egged on by a scumbag liar that they support. Their cowardice and fealty is on full display this week.
He lied about election fraud.......that was the gun powder...so to speak.
Democrats aren't the ones who've allowed their party to be taken over by conspiracy theorists and extremist rubes that think the VP can pick who he wants for president. You should really think before you call any one else stupid. Your guys are the winners in that category.Democrats encouraged and supported the riots and destruction of businesses costing millions and millions of dollars. Keep up the glass house idiocy. This “trial” shows how incredibly stupid democrats really are.
There are so many things wrong with your point that its hard to know where to start. But just a couple: ex post facto means passing a law after the conduct, which is not the case here. Also, this is not a criminal case.
As I have said before, politically I question the wisdom of this. Too many of the Senate GOP are so afraid of Trump's base they cannot bring themselves to vote to convict, even if in their judgment he should be convicted. Politics trumps (no pun intended) what is right and wrong here. So it is a waste of time in that sense and I think there are other ways that censure could have occurred, maybe even in time with a bit more GOP backing down the line.
Also, I fear that all this ultimately does is fuel Trump's claim to victim status.
All along, I said the rioters were idiots that should be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest.Got a link for that stat? It's completely made up.
Also, the amount of death and destruction across these "peaceful protests" dwarfs that of Jan 6th.
Why is it so hard to admit that all of it is wrong?
Thanks - so over 200 demonstrations that were violent. 25 - 30 people died in them with an estimated $2 billion in damage done. That's more than a "few idiots rioting".
In the words of our POTUS - it's a BFD
I say providing the gunpowder is an impeachable offence; I'm obviously correct.Hmmm so let’s use your analogy and think this through. So Trumps “lies” were gun powder right? Assuming that’s true, gun powder on its own is harmless.
So who loaded the gun and fired the shots? Trump? Or the idiots that stormed the capital?
Democrats aren't the ones who've allowed their party to be taken over by conspiracy theorists and extremist rubes that think the VP can pick who he wants for president. You should really think before you call any one else stupid. Your guys are the winners in that category.
All along, I said the rioters were idiots that should be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest.
I'm in full support of the 95% of peaceful protest and 99% of peaceful protestors.
It's the morons who portray BLM as some radical and violent group, and the even bigger morons who believe it, with whom I have a problem.