Democrats plan to introduce articles of impeachment as early as Monday

If you are including total attempts at running for President, even those which did not result in garnering the nomination of a major political party... then you would also have to include Donald Trump's failed bid as a Reform Party candidate in 2000, but you probably didn't know about that did you? Technically then... Trump record is just 1-2.
Ok sure.

1-2
1-3,1-4?

Biden still sucks. Next dumbass point?
 
But Bill Cassidy is not a member of the Louisiana State House. A censure from a body, that he is not even a member of, is a completely hollow gesture. Why would Cassidy give a crap about this?
It wasn’t the state house that censured him, it was the Louisiana GOP. You can learn a lot, but you need to learn to read first.
 
And Trump lost to Biden.
Still has a better performance record for a candidate that was never given a chance against the most qualified candidate ever. And he needs to complete his first term to even have a chance to better it. That isn’t a given since a bunch in own party want him out more than the GOP
 
Gawd I hope not.

Hopefully in the next two/three years the GOP can actually find a candidate. The first test would be whether the candidate could beat Trump in the primaries. That actually shouldn't be a tall order, but it will be if the GOP doesn't find someone with some balls. Whoever the candidate is needs to be an outsider rather than a repurposed/rebadged DC politician. The progression of congress or even governor to WH needs to end. The president needs to be someone capable of running the country - not someone who is a proven politician.
 
Then you have no idea if that account of threatening Pelosi being called is accurate or not.
That account doesn't make any sense based on how overwhelmingly Senate Democrats voted to allow witnesses... and that Duckworth and Gillibrand expected witnesses to be called and they were disappointed when they weren't. And how exactly would "redstate.com" get such a scoop anyway? That is pure BS.
 
That account doesn't make any sense based on how overwhelmingly Senate Democrats voted to allow witnesses... and that Duckworth and Gillibrand expected witnesses to be called and they were disappointed when they weren't. And how exactly would "redstate.com" get such a scoop anyway? That is pure BS.
Perhaps it is but there still zero explanation to suddenly withdraw. The withdrawal reason from redstate makes more sense than the nothing you, Duckworth and Gillibrand are providing. Usually a withdrawal like that indicates that it'll hurt their case substantially.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top