Department of Government Efficiency - DOGE

[Orange_Crush]

i was about to run for office

Well then, you are a thief and a crook, and it turns out that Elon Musky was right about you all along. Leave the penguins alone, man!

 

[Orange_Crush]

And most Trump supporters would also be cheering from a mountaintop if a democrat was elected and decided to take a chainsaw to the most corrupt institution we've heard of to date. I bet we might even see a certain fart sniffing "Lib"ertarian cheering it on. Alas, it was the orange man and Elon who started this particular fire, so it is bad unless and until we each receive evidence by way of certified mail proving the corruption of this particular institution.

Trump supporters are celebrating a recent-dem's appointment, and I think Kennedy is still a dem?

I would say that many Trump supporters are not republican. They are pro-outsider.

 

[apevol]

Well then, you are a thief and a crook, and it turns out that Elon Musky was right about you all along. Leave the penguins alone, man!

what i do with those penguins is between me and the citizens of some obscure country you've never heard of who I'm definitely doing everything i can to help

 

[NCFisher]

If the issue isnt where the money was spent, why so much gum flapping about hamas?

There are some here who will tell you straight up that they are against all spending like this. I've got no issue with them. they're internally consistent and don't bother pretending everything being cut is corruption.

I have issue with lying to skew public perception on what we keep and what we don't keep.

Even the most righteous leftist doesn't want corruption tackled because they're terrified of what they honestly believe is necessary being cut. Maga doesn't care what gets cut as long as it hurts Trump's enemies. Both are wrong.

I consider the goals of leftists to conflict with the survival of the republic and therefore, America's enemies.
Following, I think one is decidedly right and one wrong, if talking about the left.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[NashVol11]

You want proof, just listen to all the low life liberal politicians in DC. They're crying like bunch of little bit#### ( much like the libs on this board). If he wasn't finding anything they wouldn't squalling at the top of their lungs.

I don't think this is true, if he found nothing but was still frolicking around in classified systems, firing people, acting like the non-findings were a HUGE RADICAL LEFT SCANDAL on Twitter every day, etc., I think people would still have issues with that

 

[Vol737]

So wait, which is it? If Elon said he saved us from spending $17B teaching dolphins to play checkers, you WOULDN'T automatically believe him? What would it take for you to believe him in that scenario? Because it sounds like you're agreeing with me

I think most people want them to show their work, too.

 

[utvolpj]

https://comptroller.nyc.gov/newsroom/statement-from-nyc-comptroller-lander-on-the-trump-administrations-illegal-reversal-of-fema-funding/

This morning, my financial team shockingly uncovered that President Trump and his crony Elon Musk illegally executed a revocation of $80 million in congressionally-appropriated FEMA funding from New York City’s bank accounts late yesterday afternoon. This is money that the federal government previously disbursed for shelter and services and is now missing. This highway robbery of our funds directly out of our bank account is a betrayal of everyone who calls New York City home.”

 

[eVOLve]

https://comptroller.nyc.gov/newsroom/statement-from-nyc-comptroller-lander-on-the-trump-administrations-illegal-reversal-of-fema-funding/

Good

 

[VOLS INC.]

https://comptroller.nyc.gov/newsroom/statement-from-nyc-comptroller-lander-on-the-trump-administrations-illegal-reversal-of-fema-funding/

What was the 80 million for? That’s pretty vague.

80 million to shelter who and for what and why?

 

[Ritzwatch]

im skeptical that we'll cut out a lot of genuine fraud without causing headaches by cutting things that shouldn't have been cut.

I do believe that its absolutely mandatory to cut not only real fraud but also legitimate spending, because we're in a bad place financially and need to start working on a triage

i was about to run for office

Well, you are brave enough to tell us you are in favor of cuts in spending, without being willing to take a stand on where you'd make a cut, all while criticizing those making cuts.

I would say you are well-qualified for Congress.

 

[utvolpj]

Good

So you're good with the fed govt accessing bank accounts to take away lawfully allocated funds and doing it with no judicial process whatsoever?

 

[apevol]

Well, you are brave enough to tell us you are in favor of cuts in spending, without being willing to take a stand on where you'd make a cut, all while criticizing those making cuts.

I would say you are well-qualified for Congress.

id start with private contractors

 

[Orange_Crush]

What was the 80 million for? That’s pretty vague.

80 million to shelter who and for what and why?

And when was it issued? After the boss gave a presidential order not to pay? If so, the actual payment was illegal, not the retrieval.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

It's really not that complicated. If you're finding all this waste, simply back it up. Everyone should be able to agree on that (the counter argument is what, we don't need evidence?) but people love their "team" too much, football forum style

Everybody except you though, right? I mean, you are the logical one.

Those of us that actually applied logic saw what a disaster Puddinhead was going to be from the get go. And praise be to God that we dodged the cataclysmic disaster of a Heelzup administration. Or maybe we are all too cultish to understand the benefits of unfettered immigration, legal or not.

But Orange man bad.

 

[Orange_Crush]

So you're good with the fed govt accessing bank accounts to take away lawfully allocated funds and doing it with no judicial process whatsoever?

Kind of like credit card companies retrieving contested payments?

Allocated and lawful are two different things. Allocation says the money is at the President's disposal. It doesn't say that the President has to spend it.

If the money was sent after Trump's executive order, which is the claim, then it was not a lawful dispersal.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

That doesn't "mean it's verified" at all. Elon claimed $50M in condoms for Hamas and looking at the website showed he was full of s***

What website was that?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I literally stated that. Some of these folks believe that Donny is the messiah and beyond criticism.

Criticize him all you want. I don't know of any Trump supporter that says otherwise. It's when you make up **** that it gets fun.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Nobody could? Trump is the #1 and only one person out of 350+ million that could take these actions? Politicians mostly suck, we don't need to worship like this

worship?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Yep.

As long as they got some headlines about hooker piss and TrumpTreason, the trust flowed like, well, hooker piss.

They were trying to unseat a duly elected President, and work toward chareges of treason, that carry the death penalty. And the left was like, "Good enough for me!"

Claim that the government is wasting money and the answer is, "Does it make the left look bad? Well then, I'll need notarized copies of everything, in triplicate!"

Saving money: I'll need all the proofs and for you to personally run these things by me.

Accuse someone of treason, try to destroy a man: Huh, leftist words and secret whistleblowers? Good enough for me!

Don't forget, the also had 51 intelligence operatives that SWORE Trump was doing illegal ish. Nash talks about 'worship' while he kneels and slurps before his government.

 

[utvolpj]

Kind of like credit card companies retrieving contested payments?

Allocated and lawful are two different things. Allocation says the money is at the President's disposal. It doesn't say that the President has to spend it.

If the money was sent after Trump's executive order, which is the claim, then it was not a lawful dispersal.

It's nothing like a cc. The issue would be the fed govt going into the nyc bank account and taking funds.

Interesting timing with the corruption charges against Adams being conveniently dropped

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

So wait, which is it? If Elon said he saved us from spending $17B teaching dolphins to play checkers, you WOULDN'T automatically believe him? What would it take for you to believe him in that scenario? Because it sounds like you're agreeing with me

What it would take for me in the gestalt view is a majority of the items he is unearthing to be false. You show me that, and I'll get on board and vote for the Hills/Heels ticket in the next election. If a large number are actual no kidding fraud, I'm good with some exaggeration. Actually I don't care. If he can pull off $2 trillion of cuts in the .gov, I'm good.

What will it take for you to stop parsing every. single. word. that comes out of DOGE and accept that the .gov is corrupt beyond words, and that your boi Joseph Robinette Biden and his boi Barack Hussein Soetoro put that corruption on steroids? Nevermind. I know that your derangement of the orange man prevents anything resembling logic.

 

[Orange_Crush]

It's nothing like a cc. The issue would be the fed govt going into the nyc bank account and taking funds.

Interesting timing with the corruption charges against Adams being conveniently dropped

You can finally lock him up.

 

[KB5252]

So if Elon said he stopped us from paying $17 billion to teach dolphins to play checkers off the coast of Australia, you'd just believe him. Got it

Everyone knows dolphins play chess........ Not checkers!

 

[Orange_Crush]

Everyone knows dolphins play chess........ Not checkers!

So long, and thanks for all the fish.