Department of Government Efficiency - DOGE

She offered to give them out to the press. She also offered to share the DOGE daily report to the press. You have this habit of posting one minute videos that are snippets of 30 minute videos, and claiming that "they didn't... see?!"



If you're waiting for them to UPS a box of evidence to you, then get over yourself.

This refusal to believe anything without putting your hands on the documents would have been useful during the TrumputinGate coup.

So did she give them out during the 30-minute video? Can you post one here?
 
She offered to give them out to the press. She also offered to share the DOGE daily report to the press. You have this habit of posting one minute videos that are snippets of 30 minute videos, and claiming that "they didn't... see?!"



If you're waiting for them to UPS a box of evidence to you, then get over yourself.

This refusal to believe anything without putting your hands on the documents would have been useful during the TrumputinGate coup.


OK, so it's a pretty friendly press room. Definitely lots of right-wingers in there. What did they find in the screenshots?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
It's pointless to argue with these people..these are the same people that believe trump was waving around TS documents without proof..and never asked for conformation..
She offered to give them out to the press. She also offered to share the DOGE daily report to the press. You have this habit of posting one minute videos that are snippets of 30 minute videos, and claiming that "they didn't... see?!"



If you're waiting for them to UPS a box of evidence to you, then get over yourself.

This refusal to believe anything without putting your hands on the documents would have been useful during the TrumputinGate coup.

Yep.

As long as they got some headlines about hooker piss and TrumpTreason, the trust flowed like, well, hooker piss.

They were trying to unseat a duly elected President, and work toward chareges of treason, that carry the death penalty. And the left was like, "Good enough for me!"

Claim that the government is wasting money and the answer is, "Does it make the left look bad? Well then, I'll need notarized copies of everything, in triplicate!"

Saving money: I'll need all the proofs and for you to personally run these things by me.

Accuse someone of treason, try to destroy a man: Huh, leftist words and secret whistleblowers? Good enough for me!
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
So did she give them out during the 30-minute video? Can you post one here?
She offered far more than the treasonous liars lying did.

Your level of trust was much deeper then.

Like I said, if you're waiting for them to send you notarized boxes of evidence, get over yourself. If you're just wanting to argue about the level of your personal credulity, that was soiled during the TrumputinGate coup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Looks like they just don't know what fraud means.

During a press hearing on Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt waved around screenshots of “contracts upon contracts” that she claimed DOGE had “found” in the government. But as she ran through a list of the financial arrangements—some of which had to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts from previous administrations—it became clear that the DOGE-targeted contracts didn’t constitute fraud but instead were simply “against the president’s policies and his America-first agenda.”

“Are all those things you just mentioned fraud? Or are they just contrary to the president’s policies?” pressed CBS News senior White House reporter Jennifer Jacobs.

I would argue that all of these things are fraudulent,” Leavitt responded. “They are wasteful, and they are an abuse of the American taxpayer’s dollar. This is not what the government should be spending money on. They are contrary to the president’s priorities and agenda.”


 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
Looks like they just don't know what fraud means.

During a press hearing on Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt waved around screenshots of “contracts upon contracts” that she claimed DOGE had “found” in the government. But as she ran through a list of the financial arrangements—some of which had to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts from previous administrations—it became clear that the DOGE-targeted contracts didn’t constitute fraud but instead were simply “against the president’s policies and his America-first agenda.”

“Are all those things you just mentioned fraud? Or are they just contrary to the president’s policies?” pressed CBS News senior White House reporter Jennifer Jacobs.

I would argue that all of these things are fraudulent,” Leavitt responded. “They are wasteful, and they are an abuse of the American taxpayer’s dollar. This is not what the government should be spending money on. They are contrary to the president’s priorities and agenda.”


Just be happy a light is being shined on all this. The actual proof of fraud is coming. There is no doubt. Patience
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Why do they need PR? Their job would be much easier if they operated quietly.
Maybe those that voted for Trump, including the surge in minority votes, think they’ve been getting shat on and lied to. They voted for more open and transparent govt. The DOGE PR seems to be providing what people were asking for.
 
Just be happy a light is being shined on all this. The actual proof of fraud is coming. There is no doubt. Patience
The proof will be presented to those that need to see it for changes to be made. Trump was elected to do what he's doing, and that doesn't entail him asking permission from the resident VN hooker-piss crew.

Anything short of that is just useless argumentation about the levels of individual personal incredulity, which is effectively just a way for people who are too devoted to their party to divert the conversation from the fact that their preferred swamp creatures just may be swamp creatures.
 
The proof will be presented to those that need to see it for changes to be made. Trump was elected to do what he's doing, and that doesn't entail him asking permission from the resident VN hooker-piss crew.

Anything short of that is just useless argumentation about the levels of individual personal incredulity, which is effectively just a way for people who are too devoted to their party to divert the conversation from the fact that their preferred swamp creatures just may be swamp creatures.
I hate both parties. I hope they fine, sue, jail every single R or D that deserves it.

I am enjoying the show. Been needing this for decades
 
It's pointless to argue with these people..these are the same people that believe trump was waving around TS documents without proof..and never asked for conformation..

Yep.

As long as they got some headlines about hooker piss and TrumpTreason, the trust flowed like, well, hooker piss.

They were trying to unseat a duly elected President, and work toward chareges of treason, that carry the death penalty. And the left was like, "Good enough for me!"

Claim that the government is wasting money and the answer is, "Does it make the left look bad? Well then, I'll need notarized copies of everything, in triplicate!"

Saving money: I'll need all the proofs and for you to personally run these things by me.

Accuse someone of treason, try to destroy a man: Huh, leftist words and secret whistleblowers? Good enough for me!

What if you're somebody who didn't jump on the Trump Russia/piss hookers story and don't trust the headlines today either? Because that's me.

These digs ^ backfire on you because I'm validated by the fact that I don't change my stripes every 4-8 years. It's a self-own because a lot of you guys didn't believe the Russia stuff, but are happy to eat this all up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
The proof will be presented to those that need to see it for changes to be made. Trump was elected to do what he's doing, and that doesn't entail him asking permission from the resident VN hooker-piss crew.

Anything short of that is just useless argumentation about the levels of individual personal incredulity, which is effectively just a way for people who are too devoted to their party to divert the conversation from the fact that their preferred swamp creatures just may be swamp creatures.
Indeed…and a lot of Republicans up there have been more concerned with political survival too and need to pay a price for just going along with all of this.
 
I hate both parties. I hope they fine, sue, jail every single R or D that deserves it.

I am enjoying the show. Been needing this for decades
I'm ecstatic that outsiders have the power and position to audit the gov't after years of the gov't admitting that they can't/won't pass audits. I don't need to be personally read in on all the details to believe that the swamp is swampy and the gov't wastes our money. I don't need to see receipts to know that gov't bureaucracy is out of control.
 
What if you're somebody who didn't jump on the Trump Russia/piss hookers story and don't trust the headlines today either? Because that's me.

These digs ^ backfire on you because I'm validated by the fact that I don't change my stripes every 4-8 years. It's a self-own because a lot of you guys didn't believe the Russia stuff, but are happy to eat this all up.
How do they backfire? You are more than welcome to your level of incredulity. It doesn't affect me in the least.

Next question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Indeed…and a lot of Republicans up there have been more concerned with political survival too and need to pay a price for just going along with all of this.

DODGE puts the pressure on the Rs to do some major spending cuts over the next 2 years or face having their azzes handed to them in the mid-terms. Those complaining about transparency and PR aren't seeing the forest for the trees, if the Rs don't do something with the light shining as bright as it is will lose congress.
 
She offered far more than the treasonous liars lying did.

Your level of trust was much deeper then.

Like I said, if you're waiting for them to send you notarized boxes of evidence, get over yourself. If you're just wanting to argue about the level of your personal credulity, that was soiled during the TrumputinGate coup.
I don't care about Trump or Putin and never put stock in that either. There goes your whatabout. So where are the screenshots she claimed to make available?
 
I'm ecstatic that outsiders have the power and position to audit the gov't after years of the gov't admitting that they can't/won't pass audits. I don't need to be personally read in on all the details to believe that the swamp is swampy and the gov't wastes our money. I don't need to see receipts to know that gov't bureaucracy is out of control.
So if Elon said he stopped us from paying $17 billion to teach dolphins to play checkers off the coast of Australia, you'd just believe him. Got it
 
What if you're somebody who didn't jump on the Trump Russia/piss hookers story and don't trust the headlines today either? Because that's me.

These digs ^ backfire on you because I'm validated by the fact that I don't change my stripes every 4-8 years. It's a self-own because a lot of you guys didn't believe the Russia stuff, but are happy to eat this all up.
You did believe trump took classified documents illegally... Which has been it's been false
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
What if you're somebody who didn't jump on the Trump Russia/piss hookers story and don't trust the headlines today either? Because that's me.

These digs ^ backfire on you because I'm validated by the fact that I don't change my stripes every 4-8 years. It's a self-own because a lot of you guys didn't believe the Russia stuff, but are happy to eat this all up.
As he sniffs his own farts to appreciate the aroma.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
What if you're somebody who didn't jump on the Trump Russia/piss hookers story and don't trust the headlines today either? Because that's me.

These digs ^ backfire on you because I'm validated by the fact that I don't change my stripes every 4-8 years. It's a self-own because a lot of you guys didn't believe the Russia stuff, but are happy to eat this all up.
A healthy distrust of DC politicians and their pronouncements is the best way.
 
If the issue isnt where the money was spent, why so much gum flapping about hamas?
Simple. Because it generates visceral responses. Easy for me to see through.
There are some here who will tell you straight up that they are against all spending like this.
Not me. But I do have my limits.
I've got no issue with them. they're internally consistent and don't bother pretending everything being cut is corruption.
Noted.
I have issue with lying to skew public perception on what we keep and what we don't keep.
That is not me, either. Haven’t lied. Not trying to skew anyone’s perspective.
Even the most righteous leftist doesn't want corruption tackled because they're terrified of what they honestly believe is necessary being cut. Maga doesn't care what gets cut as long as it hurts Trump's enemies. Both are wrong.
Agreed.

So, how much money should we spend on the global effort against AIDS? Dollars or %.

Not a gotcha; I’m just curious your thoughts.
 

VN Store



Back
Top