Department of Government Efficiency - DOGE

#3,727
#3,727
NashVol11 said:
Biden wasn't my "team" and I was never a fan of his, nor any politician. We didn't have an entire forum kissing Biden's ass like we do for Elon. I didn't vote for Biden and didn't vote for Kamala so it's stupid to respond to any criticism with "BUT BIDEN"
Click to expand...
So, it takes forum interest for you to give a **** about a political coup against a sitting president, DOJ weaponization, the VP selling his office and admitting on video that he used taxpayer money as a quid pro quo to get an investigation into his son's business dealings stopped, etc, etc, etc...

Well, I'd say thank God there's some forum interest here to get your fire lit. Except, it seems that after 8 years of that kind of corruption on display, your sudden giving of ****s is that Tweets may put the government in a bad light and people may believe that the gov't is corrupt.


There is not a big enough font available here for the LOL that needs to be posted at that.

So, I guess kudos are in order for your very recent ****s given. Cheers to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and LSU-SIU
#3,729
#3,729
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,730
#3,730
Orange_Crush said:
So, it takes forum interest for you to give a **** about a political coup against a sitting president, DOJ weaponization, the VP selling his office and admitting on video that he used taxpayer money as a quid pro quo to get an investigation into his son's business dealings stopped, etc, etc, etc...

Well, I'd say thank God there's some forum interest here to get your fire lit. Except, it seems that after 8 years of that kind of corruption on display, your sudden giving of ****s is that Tweets may put the government in a bad light and people may believe that the gov't is corrupt.


There is not a big enough font available here for the LOL that needs to be posted at that.

So, I guess kudos are in order for your very recent ****s given. Cheers to you.
Click to expand...
Hey, if they said the executive branch can just ignore the other branches and invited a billionaire to ignore Congressional appropriations and access everyone's SSNs, I would certainly be interested in that too. LG and others are welcome to argue about Putin and impeachment and Hunter Biden or Hillary's emails all day
 
#3,731
#3,731
Orange_Crush said:
So, it takes forum interest for you to give a **** about a political coup against a sitting president, DOC weaponization, the VP selling his office and admitting on video that he used taxpayer money as a quid pro quo to get an investigation into his son's business dealings stopped, etc, etc, etc...

Well, I'd say thank God there's some forum interest here to get your fire lit. Except, it seems that after 8 years of that kind of corruption on display, your sudden giving of ****s is that Tweets may put the government in a bad light and people may believe that the gov't is corrupt.


There is not a big enough font available here for the LOL that needs to be posted at that.

So, I guess kudos are in order for your very recent ****s given. Cheers to you.
Click to expand...
Nash and Huff are running neck and neck for mental illness, TDS infection and melts of the Month Award. I thought swamprat won January, Luther won October and November.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and whodeycin85
#3,733
#3,733
GroverCleveland said:
You specifically referenced spending freeze. I quoted your post. Did you only read the second paragraph? A judge ruled yesterday just what I said with regards to the spending freeze is my understanding.
Click to expand...
I saw that paragraph too, but haven't been able to find the ruling and am skeptical that it overrules the 1st Circuit
 
#3,734
#3,734
NashVol11 said:
Hey, if they said the executive branch can just ignore the other branches and invited a billionaire to ignore Congressional appropriations and access everyone's SSNs, I would certainly be interested in that too. LG and others are welcome to argue about Putin and impeachment and Hunter Biden or Hillary's emails all day
Click to expand...
Keep posting. You're further clarifying what ****s you are willing to give.

The elected president fulfilling the mandate that got him elected? Hell no!

A political coup against a sitting president? Eh.... Yawn. You must have had few ***** to give then. Seems you didn't really get full of ***** to give until Trump got elected.
 
#3,735
#3,735
NashVol11 said:
Hey, if they said the executive branch can just ignore the other branches and invited a billionaire to ignore Congressional appropriations and access everyone's SSNs, I would certainly be interested in that too. LG and others are welcome to argue about Putin and impeachment and Hunter Biden or Hillary's emails all day
Click to expand...

The executive branch regularly ignores the other branches of government which is why you have the country the way it is... the executive branch wasn't doing its job. You do know the President can actually declassify all classified material, right?

billionaire to ignore Congressional appropriations and access everyone's SSNs
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


What is wrong with that? That has been going on your whole life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and GroverCleveland
#3,736
#3,736
NashVol11 said:
I saw that paragraph too, but haven't been able to find the ruling and am skeptical that it overrules the 1st Circuit
Click to expand...
Admittedly, I'm skeptical of any thing on the net and tried to find multiple sources. Here is one that seems to be the best description of what I could find. Does not lift the TRO, but parts of it.

gazette.com

Judge affirms Trump has some authority to pause spending

A federal judge on Wednesday clarified that the executive branch under President Donald Trump retains some authority to pause federal spending as long as it complies with existing statutes and
gazette.com gazette.com
 
#3,737
#3,737
Orange_Crush said:
Keep posting. You're further clarifying what ****s you are willing to give.

The elected president fulfilling the mandate that got him elected? Hell no!

A political coup against a sitting president? Eh.... Yawn. You must have had few ***** to give then. Seems you didn't really get full of ***** to give until Trump got elected.
Click to expand...
Being elected doesn't mean you're just king for the next 4 years and the judicial and legislative branches have to fall in line behind you, the "mandate" thing is maybe the dumbest talking point and that's saying a lot. It was funny that someone asked Elon what checks are in place to prevent corruption within within DOGE itself and his response was just "we post things on Twitter and have a mandate"
 
#3,738
#3,738
NashVol11 said:
Being elected doesn't mean you're just king for the next 4 years and the other branches of government don't matter anymore, the "mandate" thing is maybe the dumbest talking point and that's saying a lot
Click to expand...

But that isn't happening, he is using the legislative and constitutional power he has as a generalization. Anything out of bounds can be litigated, although I would say the courts (might) need to get back in line... as a generalization.

You are unhinged because The View told you to be go insane. As a generalization, I don't know why anyone would be seriously upset by what is going on... unless one has been involved in criminal activity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,740
#3,740
LSU-SIU said:
The executive branch regularly ignores the other branches of government which is why you have the country the way it is... the executive branch wasn't doing its job. You do know the President can actually declassify all classified material, right?




What is wrong with that? That has been going on your whole life.
Click to expand...
When the other branches ignore the president, all well and good. That's checks and balances. When the... er... a certain president does his job to manage the Executive branch... Oh lawd, folks get full of **** to give.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and LSU-SIU
#3,742
#3,742
Orange_Crush said:
When the other branches ignore the president, all well and good. That's checks and balances. When the... er... a certain president does his job to manage the Executive branch... Oh lawd, folks get full of **** to give.
Click to expand...

The President has many legislative and constitutional tools, for the most part that is what is happening. He is basically going nuts because The View told him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#3,743
#3,743
NashVol11 said:
The post I responded to said that no other person is capable of doing what Trump is doing, which is objectively stupid
Click to expand...

Who?

By far some of the most incredible things in U.S. political history what is Trump has been doing and is doing. But what does that matter? You aren't doing anything, you're the problem.
 
#3,744
#3,744
NashVol11 said:
Being elected doesn't mean you're just king for the next 4 years and the judicial and legislative branches have to fall in line behind you, the "mandate" thing is maybe the dumbest talking point and that's saying a lot. It was funny that someone asked Elon what checks are in place to prevent corruption within within DOGE itself and his response was just "we post things on Twitter and have a mandate"
Click to expand...
The President has a right to manage the Executive branch. Congress adds a maximum amount of money to his budget. He chooses whether he spends it.

"King" keyword is actually a pretty good tipoff of dumb. Or at least whose talking points one is subscribed to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: walkenvol, InVOLuntary, whodeycin85 and 1 other person
#3,745
#3,745
dovervolz said:
Having the will to and having the balls to are 2 different things. Not many have the balls. Now who do you recommend to do the job?
Click to expand...
I suspect Trump is in a VERY small circle of people who could have survived what they attempted to do to him and not only survived, but come back stronger and more empowered than ever.

It truly is a breathtaking thing to have seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland and InVOLuntary
#3,746
#3,746
Orange_Crush said:
The President has a right to manage the Executive branch. Congress adds a maximum amount of money to his budget. He chooses whether he spends it.

"King" keyword is actually a pretty good tipoff of dumb. Or at least whose talking points one is subscribed to.
Click to expand...
And judges have a right to review that management and step in if they see a constitutional issue, which is what they did. "Managing the executive branch" as if no one else can check them is a stupid ass talking point from idiots on Twitter
 
#3,747
#3,747
NashVol11 said:
And judges have a right to review that management and step in if they see a constitutional issue, which is what they did. "Managing the executive branch" as if no one else can check them is a stupid ass talking point from idiots on Twitter
Click to expand...

The courts judicial review decisions, but really they should not be replacing the decision of the executive branch with their own. No, the judicial branch should not be involved in the day to day activity of the executive branch i.e. "management".

The executive branch should just turn around and tell the court to specific direct them how to carry out the order or do it themselves. That is where this is heading but eventually most of this will be cleared up.


What you are complaining about is what every administration has been doing including the dementia patient.

The issue with what a few of these loon judges has done is the TROs as a generalization, everything seems like it could have been handled on proper schedule. (impeachment might become a tool that is used)
 
#3,748
#3,748
NashVol11 said:
And judges have a right to review that management and step in if they see a constitutional issue, which is what they did. "Managing the executive branch" as if no one else can check them is a stupid ass talking point from idiots on Twitter
Click to expand...
We're talking about your level of credulity per whether one is willing to believe the government is corrupt.

But since you mention it, you also seemed to believe those judges, FBI, intel community, congress, and the rest of the swamp had the right to weaponize against a duly elected king... er... President as a political coup to get rid of him and destroy his life.

So pardon me if I couldn't give a single **** about your fake outrage now.
 
#3,749
#3,749
Orange_Crush said:
We're talking about your level of credulity per whether one is willing to believe the government is corrupt.

But since you mention it, you also seemed to believe those judges, FBI, intel community, congress, and the rest of the swamp had the right to weaponize against a duly elected king... er... President as a political coup to get rid of him and destroy his life.

So pardon me if I couldn't give a single **** about your fake outrage now.
Click to expand...
You bought into the "mandate means do whatever you want" stupid ass talking point and the "judicial branch can't tell the executive what to do" stupid ass talking point, then someone points out both are FOS and you have nothing left to say except deflecting lol, talk about credulity. Can't wait for more whataboutism
 
#3,750
#3,750
Jxn Vol said:
I can’t believe the leftists on here are not happy about finding corruption and mad that their taxes are being stolen.

TDS supersedes basic common sense
Click to expand...
Its because they don't mind sending YOUR dollars to Guatemala for transgenger surgeries and drag queen story time with children.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top