volfan102455
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 8,479
- Likes
- 11,181
I have seen hundreds of BASICALLY identical situations called both ways. Maybe the most ambiguous rule in the book. Is it the bat passing the hip with swing action still going forward? The intent to strike the ball has clearly been stopped and breaks applied before the bat gets to that point.Option 2 is wrong and should be worded differently…the rule reads as this…
NCAA 2-39 Half Swing
Half Swing
SECTION 39. An attempt by the batter to stop the forward motion of the bat while swinging, which puts the batter in jeopardy of a strike being called. The half swing shall be called a strike if the barrel head of the bat passes the batter’s front hip. This does not apply to a bunt attempt when the batter pulls the bat back.
Crossing home plate has nothing to do with anything…where do you guys get this nonsense from…lol
Well said. I’d be frustrated if the roles reversed, stating “my Vols can’t ever get a call or break in a big game.” The self pity would’ve set in.FSU fans will always think it was a bad call and I don't think we can blame them for feeling that way. But it's also true that If the roles were reversed, they'd be just as happy as we are -- and unapologetic. After all, it the umpire's call and that's the way the game goes. And they'd be right.
It could've gone either way and we were fortunate to be on the good end of it. They still have to live with the fact that they were one out away with a 2-run lead and couldn't seal the deal. What's done is done and it's in the books.
Me too. I thought Blue was consistent with the strike zone for both team.It could have gone either way, just like about 30 other calls. That's baseball. I'm apparently in the minority, but I thought that was one of the more consistently called games I've seen this year.
Where was the camera? Makes a big difference.ESPN, while showing Vol highlights of one of the most amazing baseball games in UT's history, wanted to make sure everyone saw Blake Burke (supposedly??) holding back his swing with two strikes and two outs in the bottom of the ninth. (ESPN really loves us, don't they?) Sooooo, what say you Vol Nation?
This is my take. I understand the game would’ve been over and the rest doesn’t matter but they still had a chance to get BB out, or BA out or DD out and they failed 3 more times to do that.FSU fans will always think it was a bad call and I don't think we can blame them for feeling that way. But it's also true that If the roles were reversed, they'd be just as happy as we are -- and unapologetic. After all, it the umpire's call and that's the way the game goes. And they'd be right.
It could've gone either way and we were fortunate to be on the good end of it. They still have to live with the fact that they were one out away with a 2-run lead and couldn't seal the deal. What's done is done and it's in the books.
I umpired for several years and had I been at third he would have been out. Sorry guys. (or for that matter behind the plate)FSU fans will always think it was a bad call and I don't think we can blame them for feeling that way. But it's also true that If the roles were reversed, they'd be just as happy as we are -- and unapologetic. After all, it the umpire's call and that's the way the game goes. And they'd be right.
It could've gone either way and we were fortunate to be on the good end of it. They still have to live with the fact that they were one out away with a 2-run lead and couldn't seal the deal. What's done is done and it's in the books.