- Joined
- Jul 12, 2012
- Messages
- 37,774
- Likes
- 15,699
Okay, here's the problem I have with conspiracy theories: they don't account for the illogical and the stupid. Conspiracy theories arise when the known available facts don't add up to explain some situation. But in finding a rational explanation they never account for people who are ridiculously stupid, or people who lie for the fun of it, or people with totally unrelated and obscure personal agendas, or just bizarre coincidence.
I can't tell you how many times I've heard some citizen say conspiratorially, "You know why the government's doing this? It's because so-and-so's in bed with so-and-so and blah blah blah...." But I was in the damn room when the particular decision was made and it was simply because one idiot in charge simply didn't understand and no one else would press the matter out of self-preservation. They'd just roll their eyes and make jokes after the meeting.
I've seen first hand so many times how completely illogical decisions get made out of a combination of idiocy, ignorance, tangential self-interests and simple employment-level self-preservation, that I rarely put any stock in conspiracy theories because they assume way too much competence on the part of the actors.
I haven't read up on any of these disappearances but my general experience always tells me that the theories miss real possibilities by the very act of seeking rational explanations.
All of the cases he has worked has accounted for these probabilities. If you do a little more reading on the subject you will find that he states as much. If I remember correctly, he states that 99% of missing folks are for the very reasons you have listed above.
It's that 1% that's odd and he investigates.
I find no fault with him trying to help a family get some closure.