Does this hurt recruitment?

So.. no stats, proof or anything? Just saw it in real time and your savant level memory for 9 year old offenses that ran tempo is not to be bothered by any objective data. Provide some kind of stat that proves your point. I posed that the tempo isn’t new. Found sources from about the halfway point for both teams was shocked to find that with a decent data set, not the full set to your point, the baylor offense actually ran faster… but you feel differently?
That's where we're at. Anything else?
 
That's where we're at. Anything else?

In 2014 Baylor ran 1138 plays with 377 minute of total TOP. Which means they ran 3.019 plays per minute. Snapped the ball every 19.88 seconds

2022 UT- 945 plays 328 total TOP. 2.88 plays per minute. Snapped the ball every 20.83 seconds

Probably need to brush up on your memory
 
In 2014 Baylor ran 1138 plays with 377 minute of total TOP. Which means they ran 3.019 plays per minute. Snapped the ball every 19.88 seconds

2022 UT- 945 plays 328 total TOP. 2.88 plays per minute. Snapped the ball every 20.83 seconds

Probably need to brush up on your memory
We should all be so learned up on another school as much as you are with Baylor. You've changed nothing.. I REMEMBER what I've seen the past two seasons perfectly fine. Shill on for another program in an attempt to discount ours to your utmost content.

And does your lil math division exhibition take into factor SCORES? If Baylor ran more plays in less time of possession, maybe the clock stopping after an incompleted pass and the clock not running before a PUNT accounts for your perceived gaps. Allz I know is anyone who watched Heupel’s offense didn’t see 20 seconds click off the play clock when the full offense was running. Only at the end of games when they were trying to run down the game. Another project for you to undertake, what was Baylor’s completion percentage in comparison to ours these past two seasons?
 
Last edited:
We should all be so learned up on another school as much as you are with Baylor. You've changed nothing.. I REMEMBER what I've seen the past two seasons perfectly fine. Shill on for another program in an attempt to discount ours to your utmost content.

And does your lil math division exhibition take into factor SCORES? If Baylor ran more plays in less time of possession, maybe the clock stopping after an incompleted pass and the clock not running before a PUNT accounts for your perceived gaps. Allz I know is anyone who watched Heupel’s offense didn’t see 20 seconds click off the play clock when the full offense was running. Only at the end of games when they were trying to run down the game. Another project for you to undertake, what was Baylor’s completion percentage in comparison to ours these past two seasons?
They had more TOP, and they just also got more plays off per minute. Just hold the L. I gave the accepted stat for tempo (though your eyes make a compelling case to replace that) I didn’t point out baylors pace to prove you wrong just stated they used pace like Huepel with a stat. You were wrong. Doubled down and wrong again. Then said you don’t care them eyes tell you differently… so, just be wrong. When you’re in a hole stop digging.
 
They had more TOP, and they just also got more plays off per minute. Just hold the L. I gave the accepted stat for tempo (though your eyes make a compelling case to replace that) I didn’t point out baylors pace to prove you wrong just stated they used pace like Huepel with a stat. You were wrong. Doubled down and wrong again. Then said you don’t care them eyes tell you differently… so, just be wrong. When you’re in a hole stop digging.
So you’re just DIVIDING. What I thought. 😏 Come back when you’ve compared their completion percentages and scoring effectiveness…cuz those matter. Nothing you’ve vomited out changed what was on the play clock when the ball was snapped. You’re just background noise, cuz.
 
It doesn’t matter because your premise is wrong. Baylor ran tempo +/- within 1 second of last years team. They threw a completion % of 6% less than UT. If I take their passing plays and multiply by 94% then Ut is only .4 seconds slower between snaps. Tennessee averaged more first downs per play so the clock stopped while the chains moved at a higher clip.. that probably means advantage Baylor in the tempo department. Baylor was penalized 22 times more, so probably artificially juices their tempo a little.. but not really. UT rushed it at .5% higher clip, which leads to more time run off. But all in all over a season you’re splitting half a second here or there. So to your point that Huepel was the first to do it like this… No, he’s not the first, it’s possible he’s not even the fastest. We can keep going, maybe go chart all Baylors plays that ended out of bounds and I’ll chart tennessees… then maybe we can find another half second or so in either direction..
You’re not going to admit you’re wrong, but we both know. Don’t believe your lying eyes

@butchna just want to make sure you’ve seen this… weird, autocorrect tried to type Bitchna. AI is truly getting out of hand
 
Last edited:
My "LOL" was from this having been addressed in several other posts since yesterday. This has been beaten to death. How about reading beyond just the posts that you want to respond to, so you aren't so damn repetitive?
 

VN Store



Back
Top